<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">nguhist</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История, филология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1818-7919</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Novosibirsk State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-7-37-52</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">nguhist-1144</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АРХЕОЛОГИЯ ЕВРАЗИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARCHAEOLOGY OF EURASIA</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Технологическая вариабельность каменного производства в индустрии грота Тешик-Таш</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Technological Lithic Production Variability of the Teshik-Tash Grotto Industry</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0205-2077</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Павленок</surname><given-names>К. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pavlenok</surname><given-names>K. K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Константин Константинович Павленок, кандидат исторических наукScopus Author ID 55249971300WoS Researcher ID Q-5415-2016</p><p>Новосибирск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Konstantin K. Pavlenok, Candidate of Sciences (History)Scopus Author ID 55249971300WoS Researcher ID Q-5415-2016</p><p>Novosibirsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">pavlenok-k@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-0818</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бочарова</surname><given-names>Е. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bocharova</surname><given-names>E. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Екатерина Николаевна Бочарова, младший научный сотрудникScopus Author ID 57200540517WoS Researcher ID E-9361-2018</p><p>Новосибирск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ekaterina N. Bocharova, Junior ResearcherScopus Author ID 57200540517WoS Researcher ID E-9361-2018</p><p>Novosibirsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">bocharova.e@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0916-184X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Медведев</surname><given-names>С. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Medvedev</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Станислав Павлович Медведев, научный сотрудникWoS Researcher ID ABB-2025-2021</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Stanislav P. Medvedev, ResearcherWoS Researcher ID ABB-2025-2021</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">stas-roi@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4232-9587</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Когай</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kogai</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сергей Александрович Когай, кандидат исторических наукScopus Author ID 36239257800WoS Researcher ID M-7071-2014 </p><p>Новосибирск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sergei A. Kogai, Candidate of Sciences (History)Scopus Author ID 36239257800WoS Researcher ID M-7071-2014 </p><p>Novosibirsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">kogai@irkutsk.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3727-776X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Павленок</surname><given-names>Г. Д.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pavlenok</surname><given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Галина Дмитриевна Павленок, кандидат исторических наукScopus Author ID 57199861603WoS Researcher ID Q-5407-2016</p><p>Новосибирск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Galina D. Pavlenok, Candidate of Sciences (History)Scopus Author ID 57199861603WoS Researcher ID Q-5407-2016</p><p>Novosibirsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">lukianovagalina@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт археологии и этнографии Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Павленок К.К., Бочарова Е.Н., Медведев С.П., Когай С.А., Павленок Г.Д., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Павленок К.К., Бочарова Е.Н., Медведев С.П., Когай С.А., Павленок Г.Д.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Pavlenok K.K., Bocharova E.N., Medvedev S.P., Kogai S.A., Pavlenok G.D.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://nguhist.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1144">https://nguhist.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1144</self-uri><abstract><p>Индустрия грота Тешик-Таш имеет бесспорную привязку к неандертальской популяции, что подтверждено, в том числе, и генетическими исследованиями. В этой связи технологическое изучение каменной коллекции имеет большое значение. Ранее авторами была обработана коллекция Тешик-Таша, хранящаяся в МАЭ РАН (Санкт-Петербург). В настоящей статье представлены данные обработки коллекции Тешик-Таша, хранящейся в НИИ и Музее антропологии им. Д. Н. Анучина МГУ, в основном подтверждающие выводы предыдущего исследования. В результате удалось зафиксировать безусловное доминирование центростремительной модели расщепления камня, использование которой запечатлено в морфологии изделий всех типологически значимых категорий. Вместе с тем ряд артефактов указывает на существование технологической вариабельности каменного производства в индустрии как на этапе изготовления сколов-заготовок (использование подклиновидных и объемных нуклеусов), так и на этапе оформления орудий (тронкированно-фасетированные изделия). При этом леваллуазское расщепление зафиксировано в материалах коллекции НИИ и Музея антропологии МГУ в таком же подчиненном положении, что и в коллекции Кунсткамеры. Анализ материалов грота Тешик-Таш, находящихся в Национальном музее истории Узбекистана в Ташкенте, расширит наши знания о навыках неандертальцев Центральной Азии в каменном производстве.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Purpose. For the Central Asian territories, only the discovery of a burial from Teshik-Tash has an indisputable connection with the Neanderthal population confirmed by genetic studies. In this situation, it is important to fully characterize the technological repertoire of this hominin species through a detailed study of the lithic industry of TeshikTash. One of the parts of the Teshik-Tash collection, kept in the collections of the Kunstkamera (St. Petersburg, Russia), was previously analyzed. Observations regarding the operation of radial and disc-shaped cores at the late stages of utilization, as well as the identified features in the morphology of points, again identified the problem of the presence / absence of the Levallois component in the Teshik-Tash industry.Materials and Methods. Attributive analysis was chosen as a research tool, which was previously applied to the collection from the Kunstkamera. It allows reconstructing the entire “operational chain” of knapping lithic raw materials at the site and identifying the technological features of the production of different types of blanks.Results. The performed analysis allows identifying some features of the knapping technology in the Teshik-Tash industry, such as: the dominant knapping system is centripetal; the using of Levallois technology is recorded in the one core; a method of shaping the core front by creating a rib at the base and using lateral spalls; a case of the volumetric concept of knapping has been identified; the strategies used in the industry resulted in a low standardized product; the rare design of percussion platforms and their reduction. The tool kit is characterized by the using of cores as the tools; the presence of two groups of “special purpose” tools; the irregularly retouched flakes as a background tool category; the presence of truncated and truncated-faceted pieces.Discussion. The knapping approach was quite flexible, and this implies the possibility of switching from one model to another at different stages of core utilization. For this reason, some cores fall into the “grey zone” between radial, discoid, and Levallois types. At the same time, the Levallois technique occupies a clearly subordinate position in the industry, was extremely rarely used in the early stages of core utilization, and had almost no effect on the overall appearance of blanks. For this reason, we believe that Levallois technique should be considered as a one of the significant characteristics of the Teshik-Tash industry with great caution, as well as direct analogies with the new Middle Paleolithic complexes of the Tien Shan low mountains.Conclusion. The processing of the Teshik-Tash collection made it possible to fix the dominance of the centripetal model of lithic knapping, the use of which is imprinted in the morphology of products of all main categories. At the same time, a number of artifacts point to the existence of technological variability in lithic production in the industry, both at the stage of making blanks (the use of sub-wedge-shaped and volumetric cores) and at the stage of designing tools (truncated-faceted products). These circumstances expand our understanding of the behavioral characteristics of the Neanderthals who lived in the west of Central Asia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>грот Тешик-Таш</kwd><kwd>неандертальцы</kwd><kwd>средний палеолит</kwd><kwd>каменная индустрия</kwd><kwd>атрибутивный анализ</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Teshik-Tash grotto</kwd><kwd>Neandertals</kwd><kwd>the Middle Paleolithic</kwd><kwd>lithic industry</kwd><kwd>attribute analysis</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований, проект № 20- 09-00440 «Юго-восточная периферия расселения неандертальцев: новые данные археологии»</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The research is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-09-00440 “Southeastern periphery of Neanderthal dispersal: new archaeological data”</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вишняцкий Л. Б. О причинах перехода к верхнему палеолиту // Современные экспериментально-трасологические и технико-технологические разработки в археологии. СПб.: Изд-во ИИМК РАН, 1999. С. 168–170.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bar-Yosef O., Van Peer P. The Chaıne Operatoire Approach in Middle Paleolithic Archaeology. Current Anthropology, 2009, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 103–131.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Деревянко А. П. Верхний палеолит в Африке и Евразии и формирование человека современного анатомического типа. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2011. 560 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boeda E. Levallois: A Volumetric Construction, Methods, and Technique. In: The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology. Madison, WI, Prehistory Press, 1995, pp. 41–68.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Колобова К. А. Приемы оформления каменных орудий в палеолитических индустриях Горного Алтая. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2006. 136 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chabai V. P., Demidenko Y. A. The Classification of Flint Artifacts. In: The Middle Paleolithic of Western Crimea. Liege, ERAUL, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 31–52.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кривошапкин А. И. Обирахматский вариант перехода от среднего к верхнему палеолиту: Автореф. дис. … д-ра ист. наук. Новосибирск, 2012. 38 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Conard N. J., Soressi M., Parkington J. E., Wurz S., Yates R. A Unified Lithic Taxonomy Based on Patterns of Core Reduction. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 2004, vol. 59, pp. 13–17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кривошапкин А. И., Павленок К. К. Вариабельность комплексов обирахматской традиции в каменном веке Центральной Азии // Актуальные вопросы археологии и этнологии Центральной Азии: Материалы междунар. науч. конф. Иркутск, 2015. С. 71–76.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derevianko A. P. Verkhnii paleolit v Afrike i Evrazii i formirovanie cheloveka sovremennogo anatomicheskogo tipa [The Upper Palaeolithic in Africa and Eurasia and the Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans]. Novosibirsk, IAET SB RAS Publ., 2011, 560 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Любин В. П. Нижний палеолит // Каменный век на территории СССР. М., 1970. С. 19–42. (МИА № 166)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gabori M. Nouvelles decouvertes dans le Paleolithique d’Asie centrale sovietique. In: Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia. Philadelphia, Uni. Mus. of Pennsylvania, 1988, pp. 287– 295.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Окладников А. П. Палеолит и мезолит Средней Азии // Средняя Азия в эпоху камня и бронзы. Ташкент, 1966. С. 11–75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glantz M., Athreya S., Ritzman T. Is Central Asia the Eastern Outpost of the Neandertal Range? A Reassessment of the Teshik-Tash Child. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2009, vol. 138 (1), pp. 45–61. DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20897</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Павленок Г. Д., Козликин М. Б., Шуньков М. В. Мелкопластинчатое расщепление в индустриях раннего верхнего палеолита Денисовой пещеры: данные анализа последовательности сколов // Уральский исторический вестник. 2021. № 1 (70). С. 123–128. DOI 10.30759/1728-9718-2021-1(70)-123-128</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glantz M., Viola B., Wrinn P., Chikisheva T., Derevianko A., Krivoshapkin A., Islamov U., Suleimanov R., Ritzman T. New hominin remains from Uzbekistan. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, vol. 55, iss. 2, pp. 223–237. DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Павленок К. К., Белоусова Н. Е., Рыбин Е. П. Атрибутивный подход к реконструкции «операционных цепочек» расщепления камня // Вестник НГУ. Серия: История, филология. 2011. Т. 10, № 3: Археология и этнография. С. 35–46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gunz P., Stansfield E. The Mousterian child from Teshik-Tash is a Neanderthal: a geometric morphometric study of the frontal bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2012, vol. 149 (3), pp. 365–379. DOI 10.1002/ajpa.22133</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Павленок К. К., Бочарова Е. Н., Когай С. А., Павленок Г. Д. Технологический репертуар неандертальцев Тешик-Таша: новые данные // Уральский исторический вестник. 2022. № 2 (75). С. 115–127. DOI 10.30759/1728-9718-2022-2(75)-115-127</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Inizan M. L., Reduron-Ballinger M., Roche G., Tixier J. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone. Meudon, C.R.E.P., 1999, 127 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ранов В. А., Несмеянов С. А. Палеолит и стратиграфия антропогена Средней Азии. Душанбе: Дониш, 1973. 161 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolobova K. A. Priemy oformleniya kamennykh orudii v paleoliticheskikh industriyakh Gornogo Altaya [Lithic Tools Shaping Techniques in the Paleolithic industries of the Altai mountains]. Novosibirsk, IAET SB RAS Publ., 2006, 136 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тешик-Таш. Палеолитический человек. М.: Наука, 1949. 312 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolobova K. A., Flas D., Krivoshapkin A. I., Pavlenok K. K., Vandenberghe D., De Dapper M. Reassessment of the Lower Paleolithic (Acheulean) presence in the western Tien Shan. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2018, vol. 10, iss. 3, pp. 615–630. DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0367-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bar-Yosef O., Van Peer P. The Chaıne Operatoire Approach in Middle Paleolithic Archaeology. Current Anthropology, 2009, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 103–131.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krause J., Orlando L., Serre D., Viola B., Prüfer K., Richards M. P., Hublin J.-J., Hänni C., Derevianko A. P., Pääbo S. Neanderthals in Central Asia and Siberia. Nature, 2007, vol. 449, pp. 721–725. DOI 10.1038/nature06185</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boeda E. Levallois: A Volumetric Construction, Methods, and Technique. In: The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology. Madison, WI, Prehistory Press, 1995, pp. 41–68.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krivoshapkin A. I. Obirakhmatskii variant perekhoda ot srednego k verkhnemu paleolitu [Obirakhmatian Upper to Middle Paleolithic Transition]. Dr. His. Sci. Syn. Diss. Novosibirsk, 2012, 38 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chabai V. P., Demidenko Y. A. The Classification of Flint Artifacts. In: The Middle Paleolithic of Western Crimea. Liege, ERAUL, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 31–52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krivoshapkin A. I., Pavlenok K. K. Variabel'nost' kompleksov obirakhmatskoi traditsii v kamennom veke Tsentral'noi Azii [Obirakhmatian variability in the Central Asia Stone Age]. In: Actual Problems in Archaeology and Ethnology. Irkutsk, 2015, pp. 71–76. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Conard N. J., Soressi M., Parkington J. E., Wurz S., Yates R. A Unified Lithic Taxonomy Based on Patterns of Core Reduction. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 2004, vol. 59, pp. 13–17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krivoshapkin A., Shnaider S., Kolobova K., Viola B., Chargynov T., Krajcarz M. T., Krajcarz M., Fedorowicz S. Middle Paleolithic variability in Central Asia: lithic assemblage of Sel'Ungur cave. Quaternary International, 2020, vol. 535, pp. 88–103. DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.051</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gabori M. Nouvelles decouvertes dans le Paleolithique d’Asie centrale sovietique. In: Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia. Philadelphia, Uni. Mus. of Pennsylvania, 1988, pp. 287– 295.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenoir M., Turq A. Recurrent centripetal debitage (Levallois and Discoidal): continuity or discontinuity. In: The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology. Madison, WI, Prehistory Press, 1995, pp. 249–255.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glantz M., Athreya S., Ritzman T. Is Central Asia the Eastern Outpost of the Neandertal Range? A Reassessment of the Teshik-Tash Child. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2009, vol. 138 (1), pp. 45–61. DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20897</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lyubin V. P. Nizhnii paleolit [Lower Paleolithic]. In: Stone Age in the USSR. Moscow, 1970, pp. 19–42. (MIA. No. 166) (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glantz M., Viola B., Wrinn P., Chikisheva T., Derevianko A., Krivoshapkin A., Islamov U., Suleimanov R., Ritzman T. New hominin remains from Uzbekistan. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, vol. 55, iss. 2, pp. 223–237. DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Monigal K. The Levantine Leptolithic: Blade Production from the Lower Paleolithic to the down of the Upper Paleolithic: PhD Diss. Dallas, MA, Southern Methodist Uni. Press, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gunz P., Stansfield E. The Mousterian child from Teshik-Tash is a Neanderthal: a geometric morphometric study of the frontal bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2012, vol. 149 (3), pp. 365–379. DOI 10.1002/ajpa.22133</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ohnuma K. Analysis of debitage pieces from experimentally reduced “classical Levallois” and “discoidal” cores. In: The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology. Madison, WI, Prehistory Press, 1995, pp. 257–266.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Inizan M. L., Reduron-Ballinger M., Roche G., Tixier J. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone. Meudon, C.R.E.P., 1999, 127 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Okladnikov A. P. Paleolit i mezolit Srednei Azii [Paleolithic and Mesolithic of the Central Asia]. In: Central Asia in the Stone and Bronze Age. Tashkent, 1966, pp. 11–75. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kolobova K. A., Flas D., Krivoshapkin A. I., Pavlenok K. K., Vandenberghe D., De Dapper M. Reassessment of the Lower Paleolithic (Acheulean) presence in the western Tien Shan. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2018, vol. 10, iss. 3, pp. 615–630. DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0367-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlenok G. D., Kozlikin M. B., Shunkov M. V. Melkoplastinchatoe rasshcheplenie v industriyakh rannego verkhnego paleolita Denisovoj peshchery: dannye analiza posledovatelnosti skolov [Small blade technology in the Early Upper Paleolithic Industries from Denisova Cave: Data from Analysis of a Lithic Reduction Sequence]. Ural Historical Journal, 2021, no. 1 (70), pp. 123–128. (in Russ.) DOI 10.30759/1728-9718-2021-1(70)-123-128</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krause J., Orlando L., Serre D., Viola B., Prüfer K., Richards M. P., Hublin J.-J., Hänni C., Derevianko A. P., Pääbo S. Neanderthals in Central Asia and Siberia. Nature, 2007, vol. 449, pp. 721–725. DOI 10.1038/nature06185</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlenok K. K., Belousova N. E., Rybin E. P. Atributivnyi podkhod k rekonstruktsii “operatsionnykh tsepochek” rasshchepleniya kamnya [Attribute Approach to the Chaine Opertoire Reconstruction]. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2011, vol. 10, no. 3: Archaeology and Ethnography, pp. 35–46. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krivoshapkin A., Shnaider S., Kolobova K., Viola B., Chargynov T., Krajcarz M. T., Krajcarz M., Fedorowicz S. Middle Paleolithic variability in Central Asia: lithic assemblage of Sel'Ungur cave. Quaternary International, 2020, vol. 535, pp. 88–103. DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.051</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlenok K. K., Bocharova E. N., Kogai S. A., Pavlenok G. D. Tekhnologicheskii repertuar neandertal'tsev Teshik-Tasha: novye dannye [Technological repertoire of the Teshik-Tash Neanderthals: new data]. Ural Historical Journal, 2022, no. 2 (75), pp. 115−127. (in Russ.) DOI 10.30759/1728-9718-2022-2(75)-115-127</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lenoir M., Turq A. Recurrent centripetal debitage (Levallois and Discoidal): continuity or discontinuity. In: The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology. Madison, WI, Prehistory Press, 1995, pp. 249–255.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlenok K., Kot M., Pavlenok G., Krajcarz M.T., Khudjanazarov M., Leloch M., Szymczak K. Middle Paleolithic technological diversity during MIS 3 in the Western Tian Shan piedmonts: Example of the Katta Sai 1 open-air loess site. Archaeological Research in Asia, 2021, vol. 25, pp. 100262. DOI 10.1016/j.ara.2021.100262</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Monigal K. The Levantine Leptolithic: Blade Production from the Lower Paleolithic to the down of the Upper Paleolithic: PhD Diss. Dallas, MA, Southern Methodist Uni. Press, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ranov V. A., Nesmeyanov S. A. Paleolit i stratigrafiya antropogena Srednei Azii [Paleolithic and Anthropogene Stratigraphy of the Central Asia]. Dushanbe, Donish Publ., 1973, 161 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ohnuma K. Analysis of debitage pieces from experimentally reduced “classical Levallois” and “discoidal” cores. In: The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology. Madison, WI, Prehistory Press, 1995, pp. 257–266.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teshik-Tash. Paleoliticheskiy chelovek [Teshik-Tash. Paleolithic man]. Moscow, Nauka, 1949. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pavlenok K., Kot M., Pavlenok G., Krajcarz M.T., Khudjanazarov M., Leloch M., Szymczak K. Middle Paleolithic technological diversity during MIS 3 in the Western Tian Shan piedmonts: Example of the Katta Sai 1 open-air loess site. Archaeological Research in Asia, 2021, vol. 25, pp. 100262. DOI 10.1016/j.ara.2021.100262</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Peer P. The Levallois Reduction Strategy. Madison, Prehistory Press, 1992, 137 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Peer P. The Levallois Reduction Strategy. Madison, Prehistory Press, 1992, 137 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vishnyatskii L. B. O prichinakh perekhoda k verkhnemu paleolitu [About causes of the Upper Paleolithic transition]. In: Sovremennye eksperimental'no-trasologicheskie i tekhniko-tekhnologicheskie razrabotki v arkheologii [Current Experimental Traceological and Technological Approaches in Archaeology]. St. Petersburg, IHMC RAS Publ., 1999, pp. 168–170. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
