<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">nguhist</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История, филология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1818-7919</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Novosibirsk State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-8-18-28</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">nguhist-374</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВСЕОБЩАЯ ИСТОРИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>WORLD HISTORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Проблема источников и достоверности знаний: операция «Наследие» и передача власти в Индии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Problem of Sources and Proved Knowledge in History: Operation “Legacy” and Transfer of Power in India</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шкитин</surname><given-names>Д. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shkitin</surname><given-names>D. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">shkitindmitry@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Томский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Tomsk State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>18</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Шкитин Д.И., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шкитин Д.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shkitin D.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://nguhist.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/374">https://nguhist.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/374</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена проблеме соотношения реальных событий с фактическим задокументированным материалом на примере рассекречивания документов периода упадка Британской империи, известных как «мигрирующие архивы». Рассматривается судебный прецедент, который стал прологом к дискуссии о доверии к правовым механизмам рассекречивания архивных материалов в Великобритании, дается характеристика «мигрирующих архивов», а также анализируются вероятные последствия раскрытия документов для колониальных исследований. В то время как «мигрирующие архивы» вносят свой вклад в расширение знаний об источниковой базе англоведения, то операция «Наследие», благодаря которой стало возможным формирование данных архивов, к тому же является характерной чертой деколонизации и передачи власти в британских колониях. Статья вводит в оборот новые источники по истории Британской империи в XX в., которые были обнародованы после 2011 г.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Great Britain implemented a model of transfer of power in India by granting independence to the country while preserving its place in the Commonwealth of Nations. The key element was handing over governance by Imperial authorities to local forces by legal means. The transfer of power led to the building of nation-states in former British India. The completion of the process marked a new stage for contemporary India and enabled Indian political institutions to operate on the basis of the British Empire’s legacy since that time. Therefore, the legacy’s values were important features of the power transfer. However, the Imperial legacy had material representation in numerous official documents kept in colonial offices. Some documents being witnesses of the British governance were eliminated by Britain’s ‘Operation Legacy.’ During the Operation, some of the official papers were incinerated, while others retained under the title of ‘legacy papers’. A connection between the transfer of power and Operation Legacy has not been explored to date, but one may exist. Some questions are: could the two processes, one of which had finished in 1947 and the other had commenced, supposedly, in 1947, be interconnected? Could the transfer of power have influenced Operation Legacy, and could Operation Legacy, in turn, have become a part of other colonial power transfers by Britain after Indian independence? The article aims to investigate how Britain’s experience in India influenced its developing Operation Legacy in other colonies and whether it later changed the practices of transfer of power. The author discusses why the first indications of a well-organized Operation Legacy emerged in Ceylon in late 1947, when Ceylon sought independence. This became known as the result of the internal inquiry by the Foreign Office, also known as the Cary Report.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>деколонизация</kwd><kwd>Британская империя</kwd><kwd>передача власти</kwd><kwd>мигрирующие архивы</kwd><kwd>операция «Наследие»</kwd><kwd>архивы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>decolonization</kwd><kwd>British Empire</kwd><kwd>transfer of power</kwd><kwd>migrated archives</kwd><kwd>operation ‘Legacy’</kwd><kwd>archives</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anderson D. M. Mau Mau in the High Court and the “Lost” British Empire Archives: Colonial Conspiracy or Bureaucratic Bungle? The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 2011, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 699-716.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anderson D. M. Mau Mau in the High Court and the “Lost” British Empire Archives: Colonial Conspiracy or Bureaucratic Bungle? The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 2011, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 699-716.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Badger A. Historians, a legacy of suspicion and the “migrated archives”. Small Wars &amp; Insurgencies, 2012, vol. 23, no. 4-5, October-December, p. 799-807.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Badger A. Historians, a legacy of suspicion and the “migrated archives”. Small Wars &amp; Insurgencies, 2012, vol. 23, no. 4-5, October-December, p. 799-807.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bailkin J. Where Did the Empire Go? Archives and Decolonization in Britain. American Historical Review, 2015, vol. 120, no. 3, June, p. 884-899.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bailkin J. Where Did the Empire Go? Archives and Decolonization in Britain. American Historical Review, 2015, vol. 120, no. 3, June, p. 884-899.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Birch C., Nitin M. The end of empire and an India worth celebrating. The Guardian, 2017, 17 August. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/17/the-end-of-empire-and-an-indiaworth-celebrating (дата обращения 03.05.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Birch C., Nitin M. The end of empire and an India worth celebrating. The Guardian, 2017, 17 August. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/17/the-end-of-empire-and-an-indiaworth-celebrating (дата обращения 03.05.2018).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elkins C. Alchemy of Evidence: Mau Mau, the British Empire, and the High Court of Justice. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 2011, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 731-748.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elkins C. Alchemy of Evidence: Mau Mau, the British Empire, and the High Court of Justice. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 2011, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 731-748.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hughes M. Introduction: British ways of counter-insurgency. Small Wars &amp; Insurgencies, 2012, vol. 23, no. 4-5, October-December, p. 580-590.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hughes M. Introduction: British ways of counter-insurgency. Small Wars &amp; Insurgencies, 2012, vol. 23, no. 4-5, October-December, p. 580-590.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leader D. Learning the Lesson from the Cutting Edge: the Mau Mau Case. In: Leigh Day. Public Law Project Conference, 2014, March 4, 7 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leader D. Learning the Lesson from the Cutting Edge: the Mau Mau Case. In: Leigh Day. Public Law Project Conference, 2014, March 4, 7 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rawlings G. Lost Files, Forgotten Papers and Colonial Disclosures: The “Migrated Archives” and the Pacific, 1963-2013. The Journal of Pacific History, 2015, vol. 50, no. 2, p. 189-212.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rawlings G. Lost Files, Forgotten Papers and Colonial Disclosures: The “Migrated Archives” and the Pacific, 1963-2013. The Journal of Pacific History, 2015, vol. 50, no. 2, p. 189-212.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sato S. “Operation Legacy”: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records World wide. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 2017, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 697-719.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sato S. “Operation Legacy”: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records World wide. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 2017, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 697-719.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
