Charles McIlwain, Wallace Notestein and Konstantin A. Kuznetzov Are the Three “Cultivators of the Field of Parliamentary History” of the Early 20th Century (And the Incomparable Is Comparable)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-8-100-112
Abstract
The article is devoted to three eminent scientists of the beginning of the 20th century, who studied the English parliament of pre-revolutionary England. The first is the American lawyer Charles McIlvaine, created the theory of the transformation of parliament from a court dependent on the crown to a “sovereign legislative body of the kingdom”. The second is Wallace Notestein that claimed the parliament should become an independent object of historical studies and called for archival research and the publication of parliamentary sources. The third is Konstantin A. Kuznetzov, published in Russia a book “The Tudor and Stuart English House of Commons”, where he partially began to implement the program formulated by W. Notstein a year later. Konstantin Kuznetsov comes to the conclusion that under the early Stuarts the House of Commons was more and more willing to get the commoners’ election out of control of the royal officers and the Lords of the Privy Council, and tried to make it more democratic. To that end, the House used its right to verify the election. The author examines various electoral cases and petitions on electoral grievances to demonstrate that the House of Commons interpreted the old rules and proceedings aiming to guarantee voters more independence. A special committee of the House of Commons often examined requests from towns to restore the right of sending their presenters, which the towns lost in the Middle Ages. The towns sought to broaden their representation. At the same time, the commoners remained adherents and supporters of the tradition. They had no intention to change the electoral system by a parliamentary statute. The House of Commons was trying to make elections freer by the interpretation of the rules established in ancient time. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the works of three researchers, the author shows K. A. Kuznetzov’s book was the best work on parliamentary history in the world at the beginning of the 20th century.
Keywords
Konstantin A. Kuznetsov,
Charles McIlvaine,
Wallace Notestein,
history of law,
parliamentary studies,
English Parliament,
House of Commons
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out with the support of RFBR, project no. 20-111-50473
About the Author
S. V. Kondratiev
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Kondratiev, Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor
Scopus 57191985945
WoS N-8632-2016
Tyumen
References
1. Arel M. S. English Trade and Adventure to Russia in the Early Modern Era: The Muscovy Company, 1603–1649. Lanham, Lexington Books, 2019, 349 p.
2. Berezkin A. V. Istorik gosudarstva i prava Anglii K. A. Kuznetsov [Historian of State and Law of England K. A. Kuznezov]. In: Problemy sotsial’noi istorii i kul’tury srednikh vekov i rannego Novogo vremeni [Problems of Social History and Culture of Middle Ages and Early Modern Time]. St. Petersburg, 2005, iss. 5, pp. 147–156. (in Russ.)
3. Chudinov A. V. Istoriya Frantsuzskoi revolyutsii: puti poznaniya [History of the French Revolution: Ways of Learning]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2017, 282 p. (in Russ.)
4. Dmitrieva O. V. Parlament i politicheskaya kul’tura v Anglii vtoroi poloviny XVI – nachala XVII v. [Parliament and Political Culture in England of 2nd Half of 16th and Early 17th Century]. Dr. Hist. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2011, 1436 p. (in Russ.)
5. Gruenfelder J. R. Influence in Early Stuart Election, 1604–1640. Columbus, Ohio State Uni. Press. 1981, 282 p.
6. History of Parliament: The House of Commons, 1604–1629. A. Thrush and John P. Ferris (eds.). Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press. 2010, vol. 1–6.
7. Kishlansky M. A. Parliamentary Selection: Social and Political Choice in Early Modern England. Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1986, 258 p.
8. Kondratiev S. V. Angliiskaya revolyutsiya XVII v. [English Revolution of the 17th Century]. Moscow, Akademiya, 2010, 192 p. (in Russ.)
9. Kornyush G. V. Vnesok profesora M. M. Lange v organіzatsіyu Odes’kogo narodnogo unіversitetu (1917–1920) [Contribution of Professor N. N. Lange to Organization of Odessa People’s University (1917–1920)]. In: Zbіrnik naukovikh prats’ “Pedagogіka ta psihologіya” [Collection of Scientific Works “Pedagogy and Psychology”]. Kharkov, 2015, iss. 50, pp. 213–221. (in Ukr.)
10. Kuznetsov K. A. Angliiskaya palata obshchin pri Tyudorakh i Styuartakh [Tudor and Stuart English House of Commons]. Odessa, Tipografiya “Tekhnik”, 1915, XXIV + 320 p. (in Russ.)
11. Kuznetsov K. A. Novaya russkaya konstitutsiya [New Russian Constitution]. Odessa, Aktsionernoe Yuzhno-Russkoe obshchestvo pechatnogo dela, 1917, iss. 1: Proekt organizatsii vysshikh gosudarstvennykh uchrezhdenii [Project of Organizing High State Institutes], 20 p. (in Russ.)
12. Malinov A. V. Pavel Gavrilovich Vinogradov: sotsial’no-istoricheskaya i metodologicheskaya kontseptsiya [Pavel Gavrilovich Vinogradov. His Socio-Historical and Methodological Concept]. St. Petersburg, Nestor, 2005, 216 p. (in Russ.)
13. McIlwain Ch. High Court of Parliament and its Supremacy. New Haven, Yale Uni. Press, 1910, 409 p.
14. Medvedev I. P. Peterburgskoe vizantinovedenie. Stranitsy istorii [St. Petersburg Byzantine Studies. Pages of History]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2006, 334 p. (in Russ.)
15. Notestein W. Stuart Period: Unsolved Problems. In: Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the year 1916. Washington, 1919, pp. 389–399.
16. Notestein W. Winning of the Initiative by House of Commons. Oxford, Oxford Uni. Press, 1924, 53 p.
17. Palienko N. I. Otzyv o dissertatsii K. A. Kuznezova “Angliiskaya palata obshchin pri Tyudorakh i Styuartakh” [Review on the Dissertation of K. A. Kuznezova “Tudor and Stuart English House of Commons”]. Zapiski Khar’kovskogo universiteta [Notes of the Kharkov University], 1916, iss. 4, pp. 1–10. (in Russ.)
18. Pockok J. G. A. Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. A Study of English Historical Thought in 17th Century. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press, 1957. 261 p.
19. Savin A. N. Rets. Kuznetsov K. A. Angliiskaya palata obshchin pri Tyudorakh i Styuartakh. XXIV + 320. Odessa. 1915 [Review on K. A. Kuznetsov “Tudor and Stuart English House of Commons”. XXIV + 320. Odessa, 1915]. Istoricheskie izvestiya [Historical News], 1916, no. 1, pp. 101–105. (in Russ.)
20. Savin A. N. Universitetskie dela. Dnevnik 1908–1917 [University Proceedings. Diary 1908–1917]. Moscow; St. Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2015, 524 p. (in Russ.)
21. Sommerville J. House of Commons 1604–1629 by Andrew Thrush, John P. Ferris. English Historical Review, 2012, vol. 127, no. 529, pp. 1519–1524.
22. Teterina N. I. Istorik prava i istorik muzyki: K. A. Kuznezov (1883–1953) [Legal Historian and Music Historian: K. A. Kuznetzov (1883–1953)]. Khudozhestvennaya kul’tura [Art and Culture Studies], 2020, no. 4, pp. 426–457. (in Russ.)
23. Thompson Ch. Review of The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1604–1629. Reviews in History, 2011, no. 1129. URL: https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/1129 (accessed: 05.03.2021).
24. Trevor-Roper H. Gentry, 1540–1640. London, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1953, 55 p.
25. Tyacke N. Collective Biography and the Interpretative Challenge of Early-Stuart Parliamentary History. Parliamentary History, 2013, vol. 32, pt. 3, pp. 531–554.
26. Usher R. G. Unsolved Legal and Institutional Problems in the Stuart Period. In: Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the year 1916. Washington, 1919, pp. 401–404.
27. Vinokurova M. V. A. N. Savin. In: Portrety istorikov: Vremya i sud’by [Faces of Historians: Time and Destinies]. Moscow, Jerusalem, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 143–154. (in Russ.)
28. Wilkes D. E. Habeas Corpus Proceedings in High Court of Parliament in the Reign of James I, 1603–1625. American Journal of Legal History, 2014, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 200–263.
29. Zagorin P. Court and the Country: Beginning of the English Revolution. New York, Atheneum, 1970, 366 p.
Review
For citations:
Kondratiev S.V. Charles McIlwain, Wallace Notestein and Konstantin A. Kuznetzov Are the Three “Cultivators of the Field of Parliamentary History” of the Early 20th Century (And the Incomparable Is Comparable). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(8):100-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-8-100-112
Views:
197
Email this article 