Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

INTENTIONAL FRAGMENTATION AS A SPECIFIC INITIAL UPPER PALEOLITHIC TECHNOLOGY AT THE KARA-BOM SITE (MOUNTAIN ALTAI, RUSSIA)

Abstract

Purpose. Recent investigations have highlighted an Asian variant of the so-called Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) broadly comparable in age and material culture to techno-complexes further to the west, but also showing distinct derived features. Several principal common technological features characterize the IUP in East Asia. The main targeted products of flaking were medium or large blades, the latter sometimes of very significant size, and the number of bladelets is also large. Primary flaking is characterized by alternate bidirectional reduction of cores in which spalls, alternately detached from opposing platforms along the long axis of the core, determined the shape of targeted blank: pointed blades. Reduced cores were prismatic, sub-prismatic and flat. Burin-core reduction for bladelet and small blade production was the specific knapping technology employed in the IUP of southern Siberia and Central Asia. Here, we describe and provide corroborating evidence for another distinct technological method employed in the Initial Upper Paleolithic - intentional fragmentation (IF). The most effective means of understanding knapping technology are refitting studies of archaeological collections. This article examines several examples of refitted fragmented cores and blades, as well as debitage as the by-product of blank breakage. Results . Our refitting study includes assemblages from all excavation units and partially divided, relatively homogenous raw material types, representing a diachronic assemblage of Middle and Upper Paleolithic materials, even in very disturbed excavation areas. The present study illustrates the best examples of directional reduction associated with core preparation and tool blank production because of the lack of statistical information for some Upper Paleolithic assemblages from this site. We reconstructed the process of intentional fragmentation for burin-cores and a few large and medium blades. Often, blank breakage produced butterfly-like debitage. Pieces of fragmented blades could have been used as tools. Typical attributes of IF consistently appearing on two transverse edges of blanks and present in the assemblage of artifacts prove the anthropogenic character of these flaking traces. Conclusions. It is probable that intentional fragmentation was used in the Initial Upper Paleolithic assemblage at Kara-Bom because of the influences of mobility and transportation of stone raw material by local settlers. They transported a significant proportion of raw material from primary chert outcrops situated 4-5 km from the Kara-Bom site

About the Authors

E. P. Rybin
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


V. S. Slavinsky
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


A. M. Khatsenovich
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


N. E. Belousova
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


References

1. Базаров Д.-Д. Б., Константинов М. В., Иметхенов А. Б., Базарова Л. Д., Савинова В. В. Геология и культура древних поселений Западного Забайкалья. Новосибирск: Наука, 1982. 162 с.

2. Константинов М. В. Каменный век восточного региона Байкальской Азии: К Всемирному археологическому интерконгрессу (Забайкалье, 1996). Улан-Удэ; Чита: Изд-во Ин-та общественных наук БНЦ СО РАН; Изд-во Чит. пед. ин-та, 1994. 264 с.

3. Лбова Л. В. Палеолит северной зоны Западного Забайкалья. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во БНЦ СО РАН, 2000. 240 с.

4. Любин В. П. К методике изучения фрагментированных сколов и орудий в палеолите // Проблемы советской археологии. М.: Наука, 1978. С. 23-32.

5. Матюхин А. Е. Технология фрагментации сколов // Экспериментально-трасологические исследования в археологии. СПб.: Наука, 1994. С. 62-84.

6. Мещерин М. Н. О намеренной фрагментации пластинчатых орудий в палеолите Толбаги // Проблемы археологии Северной Азии: Тез. докл. XXVIII РАЭСК. Чита: Чит. обл. типография, 1998. С. 106-107.

7. Нехорошев П. Е. Технологический метод изучения первичного расщепления камня среднего палеолита. СПб.: Европейский Дом, 1999. 173 с.

8. Ташак В. И. Восточный комплекс палеолитического поселения Подзвонкая в Западном Забайкалье. Иркутск: Изд-во Ин-та географии им. В. Б. Сочавы СО РАН, 2016. 185 с.

9. Шуньков М. В., Таймагамбетов Ж. К., Анойкин А. А., Павленок К. К., Харевич В. М., Козликин М. Б., Павленок Г. Д. Новая многослойная верхнепалеолитическая стоянка Ушбулак-1 в Восточном Казахстане // Проблемы археологии, этнографии, антропологии Сибири и сопредельных территорий. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2016. Т. 22. С. 208-213.

10. Anderson-Whymark H. Intentional breakage in the British Neolithic: some comments and examples // Lithics: the Journal of the Lithic Studies Society. 2011. Vol. 32. P. 17-22.

11. Bergman C. A., Barton R. N. E., Collcutt S. N., Morris G. Intentional Breakage in a Late Upper Palaeolithic assemblage from Southern England // The human uses of flint and chert: proceedings of the Fourth International Flint Symposium held at Brighton Polytechnic, 10-15 April 1983 / Newcomer M. H., Sieveking G. de G. (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. P. 21-32.

12. Bordes F. Notules de typologie Palaeolithique: I. Outils mousteriens a fracture volontaire // Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise. 1953. Vol. 50. P. 224-226.

13. Brezillon M. La denomination des objets de pierre taillee. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1968. 427 p.

14. Cotterell B., Kamminga J. The Formation of Flakes // American Antiquity. 1987. Vol. 52 (4). P. 675-708.

15. Delarue B., Vignard E. Intention et fractures moustériennes sectionnant des racloirs // Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France. 1958. Vol. 55. Iss. 7-8. P. 370-374.

16. Del Ray B. L`Outils fractures intentionnellement dans Ie Mousterien de la grotte de Las Grajas, a Archidona (Malaga Espagne) // Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française. 1982. Vol. 79. No. 8. P. 231-239.

17. Derevianko A. P., Petrin V. T., Rybin E. P. The Kara-Bom Site and Characteristics of the Mid-dle-Upper Paleolithic Transition in the Altai // Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia. 2000. Iss. 2 (2). P. 33-51.

18. Derevianko A. P., Rybin E. P., Gladyshev S. A., Gunchinsuren B., Tsybankov A. A., Olsen J. W. Developments of technological traditions of lithic tool manufacture in the lithic industries of the Early Upper Paleolithic in Northern Mongolia (on the materials from the sites of Tolbor-4 and -15) // Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia. 2013. Iss. 4 (56). P. 21-37.

19. Eloy L. Fractures intentionnelles observées sur des outils moustériens // Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France. 1954. Vol. 1-2. P. 29-30.

20. Goebel T., Derevianko A. P., Petrin V. T. Dating the middle-to-upper Paleolithic transition at Kara-Bom // Current Anthropology. 1993. Vol. 34. P. 452-458.

21. Inizan M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger M., Roche H., Tixier J. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone. Nanterre: C.R.E.P, 1999. 191 p.

22. Kuhn S., Zwyns N. Rethinking the initial Upper Paleolithic // Quaternary International. 2014. Vol. 347. P. 29-38.

23. Li F., Gao X., Chen F.-Y., Pei S.-W., Zhang Y., Zhang X.-L., Liu D.-C., Zhang S.-Q., Guan Y., Wang H.-M., Kuhn S. L. The development of Upper Paleolithic China: new results from the Shuidonggou site // Antiquity. 2013. Vol. 87. P. 368-383.

24. Odell G. H. The Mechanics of Use-Breakage of Stone Tools: Some Testable Hypotheses // Journal of Field Archaeology. 1981. Vol. 8. P. 197-209.

25. Watanabé H. Les «éclats et lames à Chanfrein» et la technique de fracturation transversale dans un horizon paléolithique en Palestine // Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française. Comptes rendus des séances mensuelles. 1964. Vol. 61. Iss. 4. P. 84-88

26. Weitzel C. Broken stone tools from Cerro El Sombrero Cima (Tandilia Range, Argentina) // Southbound: Late Pleistocene Peopling of Latin America / L. Miotti, M. Salemme, N. Flegenheimer, T. Goebel (eds.). College Station: Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University, 2012. P. 111-116.

27. Zwyns N., Gladyshev S. A., Gunchinsuren B., Bolorbat T., Flas D., Tabarev A. V., Dogandzic T., Gillam G. C., Khatsenovich A.M., Odsuren D., Purevjal K.-E., Richards M., Stewart J., Talamo S. The open-air site of Tolbor-16 (Northern Mongolia): preliminary results and perspectives // Quaternary International. 2014. Vol. 347. P. 53-65.


Review

For citations:


Rybin E.P., Slavinsky V.S., Khatsenovich A.M., Belousova N.E. INTENTIONAL FRAGMENTATION AS A SPECIFIC INITIAL UPPER PALEOLITHIC TECHNOLOGY AT THE KARA-BOM SITE (MOUNTAIN ALTAI, RUSSIA). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2018;17(5):72-86. (In Russ.)

Views: 133


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)