Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Means of Expressing Permission in the Business Language of the 18th Century

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-2-9-20

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the article is to describe the system of means of expressing permission in the language of documents of the 18th century. On the basis of linguistic material extracted from collections of published documents, patterns of expression of permission and their dynamics during the 18th century are revealed.

Results. In the time of Peter the Great, there was an activation of the means of expressing permission inherited from the previous era (constructions with the word volya, the predicative adverb vol'no and adjective volen), and at the same time new ways of expressing permission arose: the verbs dozvolyat'sya, pozvolyat'sya (polonisms), the phrase ne zapreshchat'sya. Later, new models remained in the Russian business language, and those inherited from the prePetrine business language mostly disappeared. Throughout the 18th century, there was a competition between the verbs dozvolyat'sya and pozvolyat'sya. In the Petrine era, the verb moch' also started to be used in documents, but its widespread use begins in the second half of the 18th century.

Conclusion. In the era of the reign of Catherine II, a new period of enrichment of the means of expressing permission began. European (most likely German) calques imet' pravo, imet' vlast', vlasten appeared in the language, of which the calque imet' pravo turned out to be particularly productive. A variety of models for expressing permission had different sources of origin and presented the idea of permission in different ways.

About the Authors

D. V. Rudnev
The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Rudnev, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Candidate of Sciences (History), Professor

Scopus Author ID 57215684388

WoS Researcher ID C-9427-2016

RSCI Author ID 196281

St. Petersburg



T. Yu. Borisova
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation

Tatiana Yu. Borisova, PhD in Law, Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor

Scopus Author ID 36455542800

WoS Researcher ID G-2120-2014

St. Petersburg



References

1. Apresyan Yu. D. Slovarnaya stat'ya glagola razreshat' [Dictionary Entry of the Verb razreshat' ‘to allow’]. In: Apresyan Yu. D. (ed.). Novyi ob"yasnitel'nyi slovar' sinonimov russkogo yazyka [New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture Publ., 2003, pp. 930–935. (in Russ.)

2. Biryulin L. A. Razreshenie v sisteme preskriptivnykh znachenii [Permission in the System of Prescriptive Values]. In: Vzaimosvyaz' leksiki i grammatiki [Interrelation of Vocabulary and Grammar]. A Collection of Scientific Papers. Kalinin, Kalinin State Uni. Press, 1989, pp. 31–39. (in Russ.)

3. Duskaeva L. R., Protopopova O. V. Ofitsial'no-delovoi stil' [Formal Business Style]. In: Kozhina M. N. (ed.). Stilisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Stylistic Encyclope-dic Dictionary of the Russian Language]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2016, pp. 273–277. (in Russ.)

4. Eisman A. A. Voprosy struktury i yazyka ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakona [Questions of the Structure and Language of Criminal Procedure Law]. Voprosy bor'by s prestupnost'yu [Anti-Crime Issues], 1972, iss. 15, pp. 71–99. (in Russ.)

5. Gavrilova E. A. Prototip kak stimul vozdeistviya na semanticheskie tipy rechevogo zhanra “Razreshenie” [The Prototype as a Stimulus for Influencing the Semantic Types of the Speech Gen-re “Permission”]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chuvash University], 2006, no. 4, pp. 471–475. (in Russ.)

6. Ignatenkova K. E. Dozvolenie kak sposob pravovogo regulirovaniya [Permission as a Way of Le-gal Regulation]. Abstract of Cand. Leg. Sci. Diss. Saratov, 2006, 26 p. (in Russ.)

7. Ivin A. A., Nikiforov A. L. Slovar' po logike [Dictionary of Logic]. Moscow, VLADOS Publ., 1997, 384 p. (in Russ.)

8. Izotov A. I. Razreshenie kak pobuditel'nyi rechevoi akt [Permission as an Incentive Speech Act]. In: Krasnykh V. V., Izotov A. I. (eds.). Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya [Language, Con-sciousness, Communication]. Moscow, Dialog-MGU Publ., 1998, pp. 97–100. (in Russ.)

9. Khoang An. Vyskazyvaniya so znacheniem razresheniya i zapreshcheniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Utterances with the Meaning of Permission and Prohibition in the Modern Rus-sian Language]. Abstract of Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1993, 22 p. (in Russ.)

10. Orlova N. V. Modal'nost' i tonal'nost' sovremennykh dokumentov s predpisyvayushchei funktsiei [Modality and Tonality of Contemporary Documents with Prescriptive Function]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Herald of Omsk University], 2014, no. 4, pp. 188–193. (in Russ.)

11. Pichkhadze A. A. Sredstva vyrazheniya imperativnoi i optativnoi semantiki v drevnerusskikh i starorusskikh preskriptivnykh pamyatnikakh [Expression of the Imperative and Optative Values in the Old and Middle Russian Prescriptive Documents]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Topics in the Study of Language], 2010, no. 5, pp. 14–24. (in Russ.)

12. Shatunovsky I. B. Rechevye akty razresheniya i zapreshcheniya v russkom yazyke [Speech Acts of Permission and Prohibition in Russian]. In: Logicheskii analiz yazyka: Yazyki etiki [Logical Analysis of Language. Languages of Ethics]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul'tury Publ., 2000, pp. 319–324. (in Russ.)

13. Shirinkina M. A. Reglamentiruyushchie dokumenty ispolnitel'noi vlasti v aspekte tonal'nosti (sopostavitel'no s direktivnymi) [Regulatory Documents of the Executive Power in the Aspect of Tonality (Compared to Directory Ones)]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 2018, no. 1 (67), pp. 120–130. (in Russ.)

14. Shmeleva E. A. Razreshenie i zapreshchenie kak pobuditel'nye rechevye akty [Permission and Pro-hibition as Incentive Speech Acts]. In: Funktsional'no-tipologicheskie aspekty imperativa. Ch. 2. Semantika i pragmatika povelitel'nykh predlozhenii [Functional-Typological Aspects of the Imperative. Part 2. Semantics and Pragmatics of Imperative Sentences]. Moscow, Lenin-grad, Leningrad Branch of the Institute of Linguistics Publ., 1990, pp. 66–71. (in Russ.)

15. Sokolova M. A. Vyrazhenie voleiz"yavleniya v russkikh bytovykh i delovykh pamyatnikakh XVI veka [Expression of Will in Russian Everyday and Document Texts of the 16th Century]. Uchenye zapiski LGU [Proceedings of the Leningrad State University], 1952, no. 161, pp. 52–79. (in Russ.)

16. Stollberg-Rilinger B. Der Staat als Maschine. Zur politischen Metaphorik des absoluten Fürsten-staats. Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1986, 308 S.


Review

For citations:


Rudnev D.V., Borisova T.Yu. Means of Expressing Permission in the Business Language of the 18th Century. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2023;22(2):9-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-2-9-20

Views: 339


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)