Canon of Sacred Texts among the Old Believers and Organization of Religious Life in the Communities
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-8-20-31
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of Old Believers’ reasoning for organizing religious life in the communities. It focuses on a unique attitude toward the texts, which had an almost sacred status. The author outlines a process of formation of the canon of the Old Believers’ sacred texts in the second half of the 17th century. This canon included fragments from authoritative manuscripts and printed editions that provided foundational arguments for the opponents of the church reform in any disputes, primarily related to the reformation of the rite and liturgical practice of the Russian Orthodox Church. The author also indicates a process in the first quarter of the 18th century associated with the Old Believers’ continued attempts to find citations to expand the canon of sacred texts. The article analyzes the analysis of miscellany compiled by the Vyg Old Believers in the first quarter of the 18th century. It contained fragments of texts that several generations of defenders of the Old Rite had selected. From their perspective, these texts testified to the justness of their views on controversial issues of religious life. The contents of this miscellany, given in the appendix to the article, show how citations of these texts used to be practical tools to resolve debatable issues related to theology, rites, and liturgy, as well as the organization of everyday religious life in the communities. The miscellany's compilers were keen to find texts that strengthened their positions and enabled their disciples to defend the Old Rite in debates with official church representatives and within the religious and social movement. The article concludes by arguing that the Old Believers’ canon of sacred texts was significantly expanded in the first quarter of the 17th century to include fragments of texts, which covered not only issues of theology, liturgy, and rituals but also the organization of the communities’ everyday life (for instance, performing occasional Christian services when no priest is around).
About the Author
N. S. Gurianova
Novosibirsk State University; Institute of History of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Gurianova, Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor,
Scopus Author ID 57222243564,
Novosibirsk.
References
1. Belyaeva O. K. Redaktorskaya rabota vygovskikh knizhnikov nad D’yakonovskimi otvetami [Editorial Work of Vyg Scribes on Dyakon’s Answers]. In: Russkoe obshchestvo i literatura pozdnego feodalizma [Russian Society and Literature of Late Feudalism]. Novosibirsk, 1996, pp. 37–52. (in Russ.)
2. Bubnov N. Yu. Staroobryadcheskaya kniga v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVII v. [Old Believers’ Book in Russia in the 2nd Half of the 17th Century]. St. Petersburg, BAN, 1995, 435 p. (in Russ.)
3. Druzhinin V. G. Pomorskie paleografy XVIII stoletiya [Pomor Paleographers of the 18th Century]. Petrograd, 9-ya Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, 1921, 66 p. (in Russ.)
4. Guseva A. A. Izdaniya kirillovskogo shrifta vtoroi poloviny XVI veka. Svodnyi katalog: [Cyrillic Editions of the 2nd Half of the 16th Century. Consolidated Catalog]. In 2 books. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2003, 1356 p. (in Russ.)
5. Guseva A. A. Svod russkikh knig kirillovskoi pechati XVIII veka tipografii Moskvy i SanktPeterburga i universal’naya metodika ikh identifikatsii [Collection of Russian Books of the Cyrillic Print of the 18th Century: Printing Houses in Moscow and St. Petersburg and Universal Method for their Identification]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2010, 1252 p. (in Russ.)
6. Korzo M. A. Ukrainskaya i belorusskaya katekheticheskaya traditsiya kontsa XVI–XVIII vv.: stanovlenie, evolyutsiya i problema zaimstvovanii [Ukrainian and Belarusian Catechetical Tradition of the End of 16th – 18th Centuries: Formation, Evolution and the Problem of Borrowings]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ.; ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ., 2007, 672 p. (in Russ.)
7. Matkhauzerova S. Drevnerusskie teorii iskusstva slova [Ancient Russian Theories of the Word Art]. Prague, Univerzita Karlova, 1976, 145 p. (in Russ.)
8. Oparina T. A. Ivan Nasedka i polemicheskoe bogoslovie Kievskoi mitropolii [Ivan Nasedka and the Polemical Theology of Kyiv Archdiocese]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1998, 429 p. (in Russ.)
9. Pikkio R. Slavia Orthodoxa: Literatura i yazyk [Slavia Orthodoxa: Literature and Language]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2003, 720 p. (in Russ.)
10. Pliguzov A. I. Avtorskie sborniki osnovatelei Vygovskoi pustyni [Author’s Collections of the Founders of the Vyg Community]. In: Drevnerusskaya rukopisnaya kniga i ee bytovanie v Sibiri [Ancient Russian Handwritten Book and Its’ Existence in Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 1982, pp. 103–112. (in Russ.)
11. Pozdeeva I. V. Drevnerusskoe nasledie v istorii traditsionnoi knizhnoi kul’tury staroobryadchestva (pervyi period) [Ancient Russian Heritage in the History of Traditional Book Culture of the Old Believers (First Period)]. Istoriya SSSR [USSR History], 1988, no. 1 (Jan. – Feb.), pp. 84–99. (in Russ.)
12. Sapozhnikova O. S. Russkii knizhnik XVII v. Sergii Shelonin. Redaktorskaya deyatel'nost’ [Russian Scribe of the 17th Century. Sergiy Shelonin. Editorial Activity]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Al’yans-Arkheo Publ., 2010, 560 p. (in Russ.)
13. Zernova A. S. Knigi kirillovskoi pechati, izdannye v Moskve v XVI–XVII vekakh. Svodnyi katalog [Books of Cyrillic Print, Published in Moscow in 16th – 17th Centuries. Consolidated Catalog]. Moscow, GBL, 1958, 152 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gurianova N.S. Canon of Sacred Texts among the Old Believers and Organization of Religious Life in the Communities. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2023;22(8):20-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-8-20-31
Views:
224
Email this article 