Linguistic Absolutism in Bhartṛhari’s “Vākyapadīya”
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-10-132-142
Abstract
Bhartṛhari’s ontological teaching is usually identified with the concept of linguistic Absolute (Śabda-Brahman) and with the three levels of speech. However, in his main opus the ‘Vākyapadīya’, each of these concepts is mentioned only on a single occasion and in a brief manner. It is not a rare case that in different contexts Bhartṛhari considers language a mental construction, or conceptualization (kalpanā or vikalpa). The latter concept was introduced under the influence of Buddhist philosophy. The Buddhists who criticized ontological concepts of Brahmanic schools were Bhartṛhari’s main opponents, so he could appeal to vikalpa in order to avoid their criticism. The ontological status of the Absolute speech in the ‘Vākyapadīya’ remains unclear. Bhartṛhari does not address this question explicitly, however, the discussions on Śabda-Brahman in early Brahmanic works, as well as Somānanda’s critique of the philosophy of the Grammarians expressed in the ‘Śivadṛṣṭi’ give evidence that he did not straight-forwardly identify Brahman ‘endowed with linguistic nature’ (śabdatattva) with the ultimate Absolute (Parabrahman). On the contrary, in his ontological system the Supreme Speech is considered an ‘intermediate’ form of the Absolute. This view derives from the teaching of the ‘two Brahmans’ in the Early Upaniṣads. For Bhartṛhari, the lower Brahman might be the basis of the phenomena, while the ultimate Brahman is transcendent to the phenomenal world. Word or sound (śabda) understood as the essence of the Vedas and a means of concentration of mind belongs to the ‘lower’ Brahman, whereas the ultimate Brahman is devoid of phonic or linguistic characteristics.
Keywords
About the Author
Е. А. DesnitskayaRussian Federation
Evgeniya A. Desnitskaya, Candidate of Sciences (Philosophy)
Scopus Author ID 56431223600
WoS Researcher ID N-2808-2015
RSCI Author ID 699924
St. Petersburg
Moscow
References
1. Biardeau M. Théorie de la connaissance et philosophie de la parole dans le brahmanisme classique, Paris, Mouton, 1964, 484 p.
2. Bronkhorst J. Bhartrhari and his Vedic tradition. In: Bhartrhari: Language, Thought and Reality. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass, 2009, pp. 99–117.
3. Bronkhorst J. Further Remarks on Bhartṛhari’s Vedic Affiliation. In: Studies in Indian Culture: S. Ramachandra Rao Felicitation Volume. Bangalore, Professor S. Ramachandra Rao Felicitation Committee, 1987, pp. 216–223.
4. Buitenen J. A. B. van The Maitrāyaṇīya Upaniṣad: A Critical Essay with Text, Translation and Commentary. Hague, Mouton, 1962, 157 p.
5. Desnitskaya E. Paśyantī, Pratibhā, Sphoţa and Jāti: Ontology and Epistemology in the Vākyapadīya. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 2016, vol. 44, pp. 325–335.
6. Desnitskaya E. Language and Extra-linguistic Reality in Bhartṛhari’s Vākyapadīya. Sophia, 2018, vol. 57, pp. 643–659.
7. Desnitskaya E. A. Istoki predstavleniya o Shabda-Brahmane [The origin of Śabda-Brahman]. Asiatica. Trudy po filosofii i kulturam Vostoka [Asiatica. Works on Philosophy and Cultures of the Orient], 2023, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 64–79. (in Russ.)
8. Elizarenkova T. Ya., Toporov V. N. Drevneindiyskaya poetika i ee indoevropeyskiye istoki [Ancient Indian poetics and its Indo-European sources]. In: Zograf G., Erman V. Literatura i kultura drevney i srednevekovoy Indii [Literature and culture of Ancient and Medieval India]. Moscow, Nauka, 1979, pp. 36–88. (in Russ.)
9. Franco E. On the interpretation of Pramānasamuccaya (Vrtti) I, 3d. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 1984, vol. 12 (4), pp. 389–400.
10. Houben J. E. M. The Saṃbandha-samuddeśa (Chapter on Relation) and Bhartṛhari's Philosophy of Language: A Study of Bhartṛhari Saṃbandha-samuddeśa in the Context of the Vākyapadīya, with a Translation of Helārāja's Commentary Prakīrṇa-prakāśa. Groningen, Egbert Forsten, 1995, 460 p.
11. Iyer K. A. S. (ed.). Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari with the commentaries Vṛtti and Paddhati, Kāṇḍa I. Poona, Deccan College, 1966, 268 p.
12. Iyer K. A. S. (ed.). Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari with the commentary of Helārāja. Kāṇḍa III, part I. Poona, Deccan College, 1963, 388 p.
13. Lindtner C. Linking up Bhartṛhari and the Bauddhas. Asiatische Studien / Etudes Asiatiques, 1993, vol. 47, pp. 195–213.
14. Minor R. N. Bhagavad-gītā: an exegetical Commentary. New Delhi, South Asia Books, 1982, 504 p.
15. Misra S. Bhartṛprapañca – A Vedāntin of Pre-Śaṅkara Era. Journal of Oriental Research (Silver Jubilee Volume), 1981, vol. 40–41, pp. 125–134.
16. Nakamura H. The Concept of Brahman in Bhartṛhari’s Philosophy. Journal of Oriental Research (Silver Jubilee Volume), 1981, vol. 40–41, pp. 135–150.
17. Nemec J. The Ubiquitous Śiva. Oxford, Oxford Uni. Press, 2011, 436 p.
18. Olivelle P. The Early Upanishads: Annotated Text and Translation. Oxford, Oxford Uni. Press, 1998, 677 p.
Review
For citations:
Desnitskaya Е.А. Linguistic Absolutism in Bhartṛhari’s “Vākyapadīya”. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2023;22(10):132-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-10-132-142






































