Establishing Border Commissariats on the Russian-Chinese Border in the 2nd Half of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-1-82-94
Abstract
In the mid-19th century, the Russian government started pushing forward the implementation of a policy to move its population eastward. This was done to strengthen the country’s position in the East and required coordination with China to establish state borders. The legal formalization of the boundaries resulted in the development of new mechanisms of border diplomacy for further interaction between both countries. However, there has been relatively little study of the approaches and tools used in Russian-Chinese diplomacy during this time. This article summarizes the history of establishing border commissariats on the Russian-Chinese border in the 2nd half of the 19th – early 20th century. The study is carried out using the narrative, structural, and functional method, the method of variance, and normative comparison. As a result, it finds out that in the 2nd half of the 19th century, diplomatic functions were shared between the Governor-General, border commissars, and diplomatic officials reporting to the Governor-General. The border commissar was a civil position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and was represented by a civilian with the rank of state adviser. The Commissioner’s powers were subordinated to and supervised by the Far East region's Governor-General (military position), who overlooked diplomatic relations. Four border commissariats were set up in the Transbaikal, Amour, South Ussuri and Uryankhay regions. The author concludes that there was no unified system of border commissariats. Although the commissars shared professional duties, they acted independently and dealt with foreign policy issues specific to their region. Overall, the commissars' activities helped maintain socio-political stability in the Eastern border regions of the Russian Empire.
About the Author
I. N. Mamkina
Trans-Baikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Inna N. Mamkina, Doctor of Sciences (History), Associate Professor
Chita
References
1. Dameshek L. M. Dameshek I. L. Sibir’ v sisteme imperskogo regionalizma (1822–1917 gg.) [Siberia in the System of Imperial Regionalism (1822–1917)]. Irkutsk, Ottisk, 2018, vol. 2, 416 p. (in Russ.)
2. Eroshkin N. P. Istoriya gosudarstvennykh uchrezhdenii dorevolyutsionnoi Rossii [History of Prerevolutionary Russian State Institutions]. Мoscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1968, 368 p. (in Russ.)
3. Kuzmin S. L. Uryankhaiskii vopros i mongolo-tuvinskie otnosheniya v nachale XX v. [Uriankhai Issue and Mongolia-Tuvan Relations in the Early 20th Century]. Oriental Studies, 2018, no. 3 (37), pp. 2–13. (in Russ.)
4. Kurts B. G. Russko-kitaiskie otnosheniya v XVI, XVII i XVIII stoletiyakh [Russian-Chinese Relations in the 16th, 17th and 18th Centuries]. Kharkov, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo Ukrainy, 1929, 158 p. (in Russ.)
5. Malanova A. V. Kyakhtinskoe gradonachal’stvo i A. I. Despot-Zenovich [Kyakha City Municipality and A. I. Despot-Zenovich]. Molodoi uchenyi [Young Scientist], 2011, no. 9, pp. 163–167. (in Russ.)
6. Malygina O. A. Kyakhtinskoe gradonachal’stvo – osobyi administrativnyi proekt Zabaikal’skogo transgranich'ya (vtoraya polovina XIX v.) [Kyakha City Municipality: A Special Administrative Project to Transform the Trans-baikal Transboundary Area (The 2nd Half of the 19th Century)]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture], 2017, no. 12, pp. 88–91. (in Russ.)
7. Mamkina I. N, Gusevskaya N. Yu. Realizatsiya geopoliticheskikh interesov Rossiiskoi imperii v prigranichnykh raionakh Severnoi Man’chzhurii posle bokserskogo vosstaniya [The Realization of the Geopolitical Interests of the Russian Empire in the Border Areas of the Northern Manchuria after the Boxers’ Uprising]. In: Rossiya i Kitai: istoriya i perspektivy sotrudnichestva: Materialy IX mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Russia and China: History and Perspectives of Cooperation: Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific-Practical Conference]. Blagoveshchensk, 2019, iss. 9, pt. 2, pp. 112–116. (in Russ.)
8. Mishakova O. E. Kyakhta: ot karavannoi torgovli do porto-franko. Iz istorii torgovykh otnoshenii Rossii i Kitaya v XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v. [Kyakhta: From Caravan Trade to Free Port. From the History of Trade Relations between Russia and China in the 18th – 1st Half of the 19th Century]. Vestnik BGU [Bulletin of the BSU], 2011, no. 7, pp. 46–50. (in Russ.)
9. Nesterova E. I. Yuzhno-Ussuriiskoe pogranichnoe komissarstvo: ot proekta do realizatsii (konets 60-kh – nachalo 70-kh godov XIX veka) [Administration of Boundary Commissioner in the South Ussuri Region: from Project to Implementation (Late 60s – Early 70s of the 19th Century)]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka [Far Eastern Studies], 2018, no. 5, pp. 118–125. (in Russ.)
10. Pavlov Yu. A. Ofitsery – pogranichnye komissary na Dal’nem Vostoke (konets XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Boundary Commissioners of the Far East (the End of the 19th – Beginning of the 20th Centuries)]. Vestnik DVO RAN [Vestnik of Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences], 2009, no. 1, pp. 105–109. (in Russ.)
11. Petrov A. I. Kitaitsy v Kyakhte (1727–1917 gg.) [Chinese in Kyakhta (1727–1917)]. Vestnik DVO RAN [Bulletin of the FEB RAS], 2009, no. 1, pp. 3–13. (in Russ.)
12. Popov I. V. Torgovlya Rossii i Kitaya cherez Kyakhtu i Maimachen [Trade of Russia and China through Kyakhta and Maymachen]. MONGOLICA. St. Petersburg, 2013, vol. 11, pp. 28–36. (in Russ.)
13. Remnev A. V. Samoderzhavie i Sibir’ [Autocracy and Siberia]. Omsk, OmSU Press, 1995, 252 p. (in Russ)
14. Sarkisova G. I. “Vo uvazhenie otlichnogo userdiya… k sluzhbe i v pol’zu gosudarstva podvigov” (arkhivnye materialy o pogranichnom komissare V. K. Igumnove i ego sem’e) [“In respect of excellent diligence… for service and feats benefiting the state” (Archival Materials about the Border Commissar V. K. Igumnov and His Family)]. In: Istoricheskie sobytiya v zhizni Kitaya i sovremennost’: Materialy V Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii Tsentra noveishei istorii Kitaya i ego otnoshenii s Rossiei IDV RAN [“Historical Events in China’s Life and Modernity”: Proceedings of the 5th All-Russian Scientific Conference of the Center of Modern History of China and its Relations with Russia of IFE RAS]. Moscow, 2019, pp. 42–46. (in Russ.)
15. Sarkisova G. I. Nekotorye aspekty formirovaniya kadrovoi politiki kollegii inostrannykh del na kitaiskom napravlenii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII v. (po arkhivnym materialam) [Russia’s Board of Foreign Affairs in the 2nd Half on the 18th Century: Some Aspects of the Forming of the Personnel Policy in Chinese Direction (on Archival Materials)]. Kitai v mirovoi i regional’noi politike. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity], 2014, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 359–379. (in Russ.)
16. Sokolenko A. V. Uchastie pogranichnykh komissarov Priamurskogo general-gubernatorstva v bor’-be s deyatel’nost’yu inostrannykh razvedok na Dal’nem Vostoke Rossii v nachale XX v. [Participation of the Border Commissars of the Amur Governorate-General in the Fight against the Activities of Foreign Intelligence Services in the Russian Far East in the Beginning of the 20th Century]. Gramota [Diploma], 2015, no. 10 (60), pt. 2, pp. 152–157. (in Russ.)
17. Sukhodolov A. P., Kuzmin Yu. V. Mongoliya i russko-mongol’skie otnosheniya pervoi poloviny XX veka: problemy istorii i istoriografii [Mongolia and Russian-Mongolian Relations of the 1st Half of the 20th Century: Problems of History and Historiography]. Irkutsk, Izdatel’stvo Baikal’skogo unibersiteta, 2016, 312 p. (in Russ.)
18. Sychevsky G. A. Istoricheskaya zapiska o kitaiskoi granitse, sostavlennaya sovetnikom TroitskoSavvskogo pogranichnogo pravleniya Sychevskim v 1846 g. [Historical Note on the Chinese Border, Compiled by the Adviser of the Troitsko-Savva Border Board Sychevsky in 1846]. Moscow, Imperatorskoe obshchestvo istorii i drevnostei rossiiskikh pri Moskovskom universitete, 1875, 300 p. (in Russ.)
19. Shmonin I. V., Shmonin D. I. Deyatel’nost’ upravleniya pogranichnogo komissara v YuzhnoUssuriiskom krae po zashchite natsional’nykh interesov Rossiiskoi imperii [Activities of Administration of Boundary Commissioners Office in the South Ussuri Region for Protection of National Interests of the Russian Empire]. Rossiya i ATR [Russia and the Pacific], 2016, no. 4, pp. 206–217. (in Russ.)
20. Shmonin I. V., Shmonin D. I. Istoricheskie aspekty obespecheniya bezopasnosti dal’nevostochnykh granits Rossii v nachale XX v. [Historical Aspects of Providing Security of Russia’s Far Eastern Borders in the Early 20th Century]. Rossiya i ATR [Russia and the Pacific], 2015, no. 4 (90), pp. 121–129. (in Russ.)
21. Vasilenko V. A. Pogranichnyi komissar v Tuve v 1913 godu: naznachenie, problemy, protivostoyanie [Border Commissioner in Tuva in 1913: Appointment, Problems, Confrontation]. Nauchnye issledovaniya Tuvy [Scientific Research of Tuva], 2013, no. 4, pp. 29–38. (in Russ.)
22. Vasilenko V. A. Otnosheniya stran «Tsentral’noaziatskogo treugol’nikа» po «Uryankhaiskomu voprosu» (1911–1914 gg.) [“Central Asian Triangle” Countries’ Positions Regarding the “Urianhai question” (1911–1914)]. In: Kontseptual’nye voprosy rossiisko-mongol’skikh otnoshenii v pervoi polovine XX veka [Conceptual Questions of Russian-Mongolian Relations in the 1st Half of the 20th Century]. Ulan-Bator, Irkutsk, 2016, pp. 216–240. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mamkina I.N. Establishing Border Commissariats on the Russian-Chinese Border in the 2nd Half of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2024;23(1):82-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-1-82-94
Views:
154
Email this article 