Practices of the Interaction of Muslim Communities of the Steppes with the Government (The 2nd Half of the 19th – Early 20th Century)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-1-108-119
Abstract
Based on the records of the central and local government of the Russian Empire, stored in the Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan and Russian State Historical Archive, the article analyzes the aspects and practices of interaction between the authorities and Muslim communities of the Steppe Region in the 2nd half of the 19th – early 20th century. Unlike the Orthodox population living in this administrative-territorial division, whose spiritual life was controlled by the officials assigned by the Holy Synod, Muslims were in the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Hence, the regional administration and several central ministries were directly involved in solving the problems of the spiritual life of Muslims of the Steppes. The competence of these authorities included establishing new parish organizations and constructing the worship places, founding confessional schools and religious and charitable societies, and organizing the believers’ pilgrimage to holy places. The legislation regulating the decision-making process for such tasks required submitting a petition to the local authorities, followed by their step-by-step consideration and then resolution. The central aspect of communication between the governing bodies and the Muslim communities was the establishment of the Spiritual Board in the Steppe region. The Kazakh population filed countless petitions to the central government during the first Russian Revolution of 1905–1907. As a result of the petition campaign, the practice of holding special and private meetings with the participation of representatives from authorities and Muslim communities of the region emerged. As sources evidence, when making decisions concerning the Muslims of the Steppe Region, local administrations relied on the trends in ethno-confessional policy implemented by the central government. Therefore, quite often, outcomes did not benefit the local Muslim population. However, in other aspects, the communication between the authorities and the Muslim communities can be characterized as constructive.
Keywords
Russian Empire,
Governor-Generalship of the Steppes,
power,
Muslim societies,
communications,
ethno-confessional policy
Supporting agencies: The research is supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 23-28-01369
About the Author
Yu. A. Lysenko
Altai State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuliya A. Lysenko, Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor
Scopus Author ID 56358251500
WoS Researcher ID U-3621-2019
Barnaul
References
1. Alpyspaeva G. A., Zhuman G., Sayаkhimova Sh. N., Dzhumalieva L. Т. Nesostoyavshiesya zakonoproekty po «musul’manskomu voprosu» v stepnykh oblastyakh i Turkestanskom krae (konets XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Failed Draft Laws on the “Muslim Issue” in the Steppe Regions and the Turkestan Region (Late 19th – Early 20th Century)]. Bylye Gody, 2021, no. 16 (2), pp. 799–811. (in Russ.)
2. Arapov D. Yu. Islam v Rossiiskoi imperii (zakonodatel’mye akty, opisaniya, statistika) [Islam in the Russian Empire (Legislative Acts, Descriptions, Statistics)]. Moscow, Akademkniga, 2001, 367 p. (in Russ.)
3. Gaiduchenko T. N. Evolyutsiya vidov obrashchenii grazhdan v istorii Rossii [The Evolution of the Types of Citizens’ Appeals in the History of Russia]. In: Dokument. Arkhiv. Istoriya. Sovremennost’: materialy V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Document. Archive. Story. Modernity: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific-Practical Conference]. Yekaterinburg, 2014, pp. 46–49. (in Russ.)
4. Grazhdanskaya identichnost’ i sfery grazhdanskoi deyatel’nosti v Rossiiskoi imperii. Vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo ХХ veka [Civiс Identity and Spheres of Civic Activity in the Russian Empire. The 2nd Half of the 19th – the Beginning of the 20th Century]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2007, 302 p. (in Russ.)
5. Iskhakov S. Rossiiskie musul’mane i revolyutsiya. 1917–1918 gg. [Russian Muslims and the Revolution. 1917–1918]. Moscow, Sotsialno-politicheskaya mysl’, 2004, 599 p. (in Russ.)
6. Kappeler A. Rossiya – mnogonatsional’naya imperiya. Vozniknovenie. Istoriya. Raspad [Russia is a Multi-ethnical Empire. Emergence. History. Decay]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1996, 379 p. (in Russ.)
7. Khasanshin G. R. Osobye mezhvedomstvennye soveshchaniya 1905-1914 gg. kak tsentry obsuzhdeniya “tataro-musul’manskogo voprosa” v Volgo-Ural’skom regione [Special Inter-departmental Meetings of 1905–1914 as Discussion Centers of the “Tatar-Muslim Issue” in the Volga-Ural Region]. Abstract Diss. Cand. Hist. Sci. Kazan, 2020, 25 p. (in Russ.)
8. Landa R. G. Islam v istorii Rossii [Islam at the Russian History]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura, 1995, 311 p. (in Russ.)
9. Lysenko Yu. A., Anisimova I. V., Tarasova E. V., Sturova M. V. Traditsionnoe kazakhskoe obshchestvo v natsional’noi politike Rossiiskoi imperii: kontseptual’nye osnovnye mekhanizmy realizatsii (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Traditional Kazakh Society in the National Policy of the Russian Empire: Conceptual Basic Implementation Mechanisms (2nd Half of the 19th – Early 20th Century)]. Barnaul, Azbuka Publ., 2014, 272 p. (in Russ.)
10. Lysenko Yu. A. Pozitsiya chinovnikov Orenburgskogo vedomstva po voprosu pravovogo regulirovaniya dukhovnoi zhizni kazakhov Ural’skoi i Turgaiskoi oblastei (40–80-e gg. XIX v.) [The Position of Officials of the Orenburg Department on the Legal Regulation of the Spiritual Life of the Kazakhs of the Ural and Turgai Regions (40s – 80s of the 19th Century)]. Narody i religii Evrazii [Nations and Religions of Eurasia], 2019, no. 20 (3), pp. 128–138. (in Russ.)
11. Lyskova E. I. Stanovlenie i razvitie instituta obrashchenii grazhdan [Formation and Development of the Institution of Citizens’ Appeals]. Pravo i politika [Law and Politics], 2007, no. 3, pp. 121–125. (in Russ.)
12. Mironov B. N. Razvitie grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii v XIX – nachale XX veka [On Development of Civil Society in Russia in the 19th – Beginning of the 20th Century]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World], 2009, no. 1, pp. 110–126. (in Russ.)
13. Plakhotnik T. Yu. Chastnoe soveshchanie 1907 g. v obrazovatel’noi deyatel’nosti administratsii Stepnogo kraya [Private Meeting of 1907 in the Educational Activities of the Administration of the Steppe Territory]. Natsional’naya assotsiatsiya uchenykh [National Association of Scientists], 2020, no. 61, pp. 17–19. (in Russ.)
14. Remnev A. V. Regional’nyi narrativ v novoi imperskoi istorii Rossii [The Regional Narrative in the New Imperial History of Russia]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Omsk University Bulletin], 2004, no. 4, pp. 6–13. (in Russ.)
15. Remnev A. V. Sibir’ v imperskoi geografii vlasti XIX – nachala XX vekov [Siberia in the Imperial Geography of Power in the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. Omsk, Izdatel’stvo OmGU, 2015, 577 p. (in Russ.)
16. Savicheva A. R. Istoricheskii protsess stanovleniya instituta obrashchenii grazhdan v Rossii [The Historical Process of the Formation of the Institution of Citizens’ Appeals in Russia]. In: Fundamental’nye i prikladnye nauchnye issledovaniya: aktual’nye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii. Sbornik statei XXXI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Fundamental and Applied Scientific Research: Current Issues, Achievements and Innovations. Proceedings of the 31st International Scientific-Practical Conference]. Penza, 2020, pp. 200–202. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Lysenko Yu.A. Practices of the Interaction of Muslim Communities of the Steppes with the Government (The 2nd Half of the 19th – Early 20th Century). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2024;23(1):108-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-1-108-119
Views:
151
Email this article 