Proper Name in the Context of Precedent Theory
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-2-31-38
Abstract
Purpose. The article reviews the proper name from the point of the modern theory of precedent. The usage of precedent phenomena in the creation of ergonyms can be explained by the fact that these units have a large information capacity, often there is a whole text and a corresponding set of associations behind one proper name. Any proper name could potentially have a precedent quality, however the direction of the movement can be different – from the precedent text to a proper name, or from the proper name to a text. The existance of this precedent quality in onyms can be explained by the involvement of the name in the interpretative activity of the addressee. The name acquires in the process of its “real” life stable signs and qualities, which are later assigned to it as components of its meaning.
Results. Three main groups of ergonyms based on precedent phenomena were identified in the analyzed material. There are onyms based on precedent names, precedent statements and precedent texts.
Conclusion. The analysis showed that the quality of precedent can be manifested in onym in various levels: international, national-cultural, socio-cultural and subjective. The international level is especially important for the functioning of proper names.
Keywords
proper name,
discourse,
precedent theory,
discursive theory,
precedent phenomenon,
precedent name,
ergonym
УДК: 81’373
About the Author
E. Yu. Pozdnyakova
Polzunov Altai State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena Yu. Pozdnyakova, Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor
WoS Researcher ID JRY-1383-2023
Barnaul
References
1. Artemieva P. S. Pretsedentnye fenomeny kak vyrazitel’noe sredstvo: dialog kul’tur v khudozhestvennom tekste [Precedent Phenomena as Means of Expression: the Dialogue of Cultures in a Literary Text]. Diss. Cand. Philol. Sci. Saratov, 2016, 163 p. (in Russ.)
2. Chernyavskaya V. E. Tekst v kognitivno-diskursivnoi paradigme. K voprosu o gradual’nom kharaktere tekstual’nosti [Text in the Cognitive and Discursive Paradigm. On the Question of the Graduated Nature of Textuality]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta Lingvisticheskikh Issledovanii [Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Proceedings of the Institute of Linguistic Research], 2007, no. 1, pp. 303–314. (in Russ.)
3. Karaulov Yu. N. Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’ [Russian Language and Linguistic Personality]. Moscow, Nauka, 2003, 264 p. (in Russ.)
4. Kim L. G. Variativno-interpretatsionnoe funktsionirovanie teksta [Variative and Interpretative Functioning of a Text]. 3rd ed. Kemerovo, 2012, 272 p. (in Russ.)
5. Krasnykh V. V. Etnopsiholingvistika i lingvokul’turologia: kurs lektsii [Ethnopsycholinguistics and Linguaculturology: a Course of Lectures]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2002, 284 p. (in Russ.)
6. Krasnykh V. V. Edinitsy yazyka vs edinitsy diskursa i lingvocul’tury (k voprosu o statuse pretsedentnykh fenomenov i stereotipov [Units of Language vs Units of Discourse and Linguoculture (on the Status of Precedent Phenomena and Stereotypes)]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki [Questions of Psycholinguistics], 2008, no. 7, pp. 53–58. (in Russ.)
7. Krasnykh V. V., Gudkov D. B., Zakharenko I. V. Teoreticheskie polozhenia. Printsipy opisaniya. [Theoretical Statements. The Principles of Description]. In.: Russkoe kulturnoe prostranstvo: lingvoculturologicheskii slovar’ [Russian Cultural Space: Linguacultural Dictionary]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2004, pp. 7–54. (in Russ.)
8. Kremneva A. V. Funktsionirovanie bibleiskogo mifa kak pretsedentnogo teksta (na materiale proizvedenii Jona Steinbeka) [The Functioning of the Biblical Myth as a Precedent Text (Based on the Works of John Steinbeck)]. Diss. Cand. Philol. Sci. Barnaul, 1999, 153 p. (in Russ.)
9. Kremneva A. V. Intertekstual’nost’ kak odna is form mezhtekstovogo vzaimodeistviya v semioticheskom prostranstve kultury [Intertextuality as one of the Forms of Intertextual Interaction in the Semiotic Space of Culture]. Barnaul, AltSTU Press, 2017, 378 p. (in Russ.)
10. Kremneva A. V. Intertekstual’nost’ kak odna is form mezhtekstovogo vzaimodeistviya: kognitivno-semioticheskii aspekt [Intertextuality as one of the Forms of Intertextual Interaction: Cognitive and Semiotic Aspects]. Abstract of Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Barnaul, 2019, 42 p. (in Russ.)
11. Nakchimova E. A. Pretsedentnye onimy v sovremennoi rossiiskoi massovoi kommunikatsii: teoria i metodika kognitivno-diskursivnogo issledovaniya [Precedent Onyms in the Contemporary Russian Communication: Theory and Methodics of Cognitive and Discourse Analysis]. Yekaterinburg, USPU Press, 2011, 276 p. (in Russ.)
12. Pozdnyakova E. U. Diskursivnyi eksperiment kak sposob aktualizatsii diskursa onima [Discursive Experiment as a Method of Onym Discourse Actualization]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 2022, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 155–166. (in Russ.) DOI 10.15688/jvolsu2.2022.5.14
13. Pozdnyakova E. U. O diskursivnoi prirode imeni sobstvennogo [On the Discursive Nature of the Proper Name]. Voprosy zhurnalistiki, pedagogiki, yazykoznaniya [Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics], 2023, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 556–565. (in Russ.) DOI 10.52575/2712-7451-023-42-3-556-565
14. Superanskaya A. V. Obshchaya teoria imeni sobstvennogo [The General Theory of the Proper Name]. Ed. by A. A. Reformatsky. Moscow, Librocom Publ., 2019, 366 p. (in Russ.)
15. Zakharenko I. V., Krasnykh V. V., Gudkov D. B., Bagaeva D. V. Pretsedentnoe imya i pretsedentnoe vyskazyvanie kak simvoly pretsedentnykh fenomenov [Precedent Name and Precedent Statement as Symbols of Precedent Phenomena]. In: Krasnykh V. V., Izotov A. I. (eds.). Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya [Language, Consciousness, Communication]: Coll. of articles. Moscow, Filologiya Publ., 1997, iss. 1, pp. 82–103. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pozdnyakova E.Yu. Proper Name in the Context of Precedent Theory. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2024;23(2):31-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-2-31-38
Views:
284
Email this article 