On the Role of Eschatology in the Ideological Confrontation between the Church and the Old Believers
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-8-9-20
Abstract
The article describes the process of formalizing the eschatological teaching among the Old Believers and attempts to refute it by Church hierarchs. The focus is on the doctrine of the ultimate destinies of the world, which gained significant support among opponents of church reform in the latter half of the 17th century. The study demonstrates the con tinuity of ideas and the evolution of the views of the authors who explored in their works the theme of the reign of the Antichrist in the world and affirmed the idea that only the defenders of the old rite are able to serve the guarantors of the salvation of mankind. The authors built their arguments on quotations from the Holy Scriptures and their interpretations in patristic literature, explaining the facts of modern reality through them. Such constructions appeared quite convincing to the Russian population's religious consciousness, resulting in an increasing number of supporters of the Old Believer doctrine, turning the intra-church movement into a broad religious and social one. The fight against schism became relevant not only for the Church but also for secular authorities since the defenders of the old rite used the doctrine of the ultimate destinies of the world to justify their opposition towards governing bodies and solutions to social and political issues proposed by them. The Church battled against the Old Believers in alliance with the authorities. Council resolutions and legislative acts evidence this. The article concludes by arguing that the Church and authorities in the 17th – 18th centuries saw the main threat in the dissemination of the teachings of the Old Believers in handwritten propaganda texts, which necessarily contained a statement about the possible accession of the Antichrist in Russia. However, no attempts by the Church hierarchs to rebut the eschatological teaching of the defenders of the old rite were successful, and the religious-social movement only continued to grow. Both sides believed that eschatology played an essential role in the ideological confrontation between the Church and the Old Believers, substantiating the right to oppose the innovations brought into ritual and liturgical practice due to the reform.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out within the state assignment, on the topic “The Past in the Manuscript Sources of the 16th – 20th Centuries: Preservation and Development of Traditions” no. FWZM-2024-0006
About the Author
N. S. Gurianova
Novosibirsk State University; Institute of History of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Gurianova, Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor
Scopus Author ID 57222243564
Novosibirsk
References
1. Alekseev A. I. Pod znakom kontsa vremen. Ocherki russkoi religioznosti kontsa XIV – nachala XV v. [Under the Sign of the End Times. Essays on Russian Religiosity of the Late 14th – Early 15th Century]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2002, 352 p. (in Russ.)
2. Bubnov N. Yu. Staroobryadcheskaya kniga v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVII v. Istochniki, tipy i evolyutsiya [Old Believers Book in Russia in the 2nd Half of the 17th Century. Sources, Their Types and Evolution]. St. Petersburg, BAN Publ., 1995, 435 p. (in Russ.)
3. Bulgakov S. N. Pravoslavie i apokaliptika [Orthodoxy and Apocalypticism]. In: Bulgakov S. N. Pravoslavie: Ocherki ucheniya pravoslavnoi tserkvi [Orthodoxy: Essays on the Teachings of the Orthodox Church]. Moscow, 1991, pp. 370–379. (in Russ.)
4. Demidova L. D. “Khristianoopasnyi shchit very…” inoka Avraamiya i ideologiya rannego staroobryadchestva [“The Christian-Dangerous Shield of Faith…” of Monk Abraham and the Ideology of the Early Old Believers]. Abstract Diss. Cand. Hist. Sci. Novosibirsk, 2013, 29 p. (in Russ.)
5. Demidova L. D. Istoki russkogo raskola: inok Avraamii [The Origins of the Russian Schism: Monk Abraham]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2022, 352 p. (in Russ.)
6. Demkova N. S., Titova L. V. Polemicheskii traktat pustoozerskikh uznikov “Otvet pravoslavnykh” v sostave sbornikov XVII veka [Polemical Treatise of the Pustozersk Prisoners “Answer of the Orthodox” as Part of Collections of the 17th Century]. In: Obshchestvennoe soznanie i literatura XVI–XX vv. [Social Consciousness and Literature of the 16th – 20th Centuries]. Novosibirsk, 2001, pp. 170–224. (in Russ.)
7. Demkova N. S., Titova L. V. Iz literaturnogo naslediya pustoozerskikh uznikov: neizvestnaya kompilyatsiya “Se nyne priide chas iskusheniya na vsyu vselennuyu…” [From the Literary Heritage of the Pustozersk Prisoners: Unknown Compilation “The Hour of Temptation Shall Come upon the Entire World…”]. In: Ural’skii sbornik. Istoriya. Kul’tura. Religiya [Ural Collection. History. Culture. Religion]. Yekaterinburg, 2009, iss. 7, pt. 2: Problemy knizhnoi kul’tury [Problems of the Book Culture], pp. 96–108. (in Russ.)
8. Guseva A. A. Svod russkikh knig kirillovskoi pechati XVIII veka tipografii Moskvy i SanktPeterburga i universal’naya metodika ikh identifikatsii [A Collection of Russian Cyrillic Books of the 18th Century from Printing Houses in Moscow and St. Petersburg and a Universal Method for Their Identification]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2010, 1252 p. (in Russ.)
9. Kapterev N. F. Patriarkh Nikon i ego protivniki v dele ispravleniya tserkovnykh obryadov. Vremya patriarshestva Iosifa [Patriarch Nikon and His Opponents in the Matter of Correcting Church Ceremonies. The Time of the Patriarchate of Joseph]. Moscow, Indrik publ., 2003, 248 p. (in Russ.)
10. Oparina T. A. Ivan Nasedka i polemicheskoe bogoslovie Kievskoi mitropolii [Ivan Nasedka and Polemical Theology of the Kiev Metropolitanate]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1998, 431 p. (in Russ.)
11. Oparina T. A. Chislo 1666 v russkoi knizhnosti serediny – tret’ei chetverti XVII v. [The Number 1666 in Russian Literature of the Middle – Third Quarter of the 17th Century]. In: Chelovek mezhdu Tsarstvom i Imperiei. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Chelovek mezhdu Tsarstvom i Imperiei: kul’turno-istoricheskie realii, ideinye stolknoveniya, rozhdenie perspektiv” [Man Between the Tsardom and the Empire. Proceedings of the International Conference “Man between the Tsardom and the Empire: Cultural and Historical Realities, Ideological Clashes, and Birth of Prospects”]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 287–317. (in Russ.)
12. Panich T. V. Ob odnom istochnike “Uveta dukhovnogo” Afanasiya Kholmogorskogo (k teme svyashchenstva i tsarstva v literature vtoroi poloviny XVII v.) [About One of the Sources from the “Canon of the Sacred Texts” by Afanasy Kholmogorsky (On the Theme of the Priesthood and Tsardom in the Literature of the 2nd Half of the 17th Century)]. In: Obshchestvennaya mysl’ i traditsii dukhovnoi kul’tury v istoricheskikh i literaturnykh pamyatnikakh XVI–XX vv. [Social Thought and Traditions of Spiritual Culture in Historical and Literary Texts of the 16th – 20th Centuries]. Novosibirsk, 2005, pp. 213–222. (in Russ.)
13. Smirnov P. S. Vnutrennie voprosy v raskole v XVII veke. Issledovanie iz nachal’noi istorii raskola po vnov’ otkrytym pamyatnikam, izdannym i rukopisnym [Internal Problems of the Schism in the 17th Century. Research from the Initial History of the Schism Based on the Newly Discov ered Sources, Published Documents and Manuscripts]. St. Petersburg, Pechatnya S. P. Yakovleva, 1898, 504 p. (in Russ.)
14. Sochineniya pisatelei-staroobryadtsev pervoi poloviny XVIII veka [Works of Old Believers Writers of the 1st Half of the 18th Century]. Comp. by N. Yu. Bubnov. St. Petersburg, Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie Publ., 2001, 448 p. (in Russ.)
15. Zernova A. S. Knigi kirillovskoi pechati, izdannye v Moskve v XVI–XVII vekakh. Svodnyi katalog [Cyrillic Books Published in Moscow in the 16th – 17th Centuries: Summary Catalog]. Moscow, GBL, 1958, 152 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gurianova N.S. On the Role of Eschatology in the Ideological Confrontation between the Church and the Old Believers. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2024;23(8):9-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-8-9-20
Views:
140
Email this article 