The Practice of Social Discipline in Early Yekaterinburg and in the Factories of the Yekaterinburg Department (1720s – 1750s)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-1-127-143
Abstract
The article, written in the context of the historiographic problem of social discipline as a significant practice in the formation of societies in the early modern period, examines the disciplinary processes implemented in the first decades of the existence of Yekaterinburg, a large metallurgical enterprise and the center of an extraterritorial administrative unit of departmental subordination in the east of the Russian state. Partially developing the idea of V. M. Zhivov on the possibility of social disciplinarization without confessionalization, the authors, however, are not inclined to consider this version of disciplinarization absolutely devoid of spiritual foundations if we understand spirituality not as religiosity but as a quasi-religious, moralizing model of building a “police” state created by Peter the Great. In Yekaterinburg, due to the fact that the life of its population was closely connected with ensuring a continuous production cycle, the problem of a high level of discipline was most acute, not only in the factory shops and during working hours but also beyond them. At the same time, these pragmatic considerations were reinforced by the moralizing attitudes of the city's founding fathers: V. I. Hennind and V. N. Tatishchev, who convinced supporters of the idea of building a “regular” state and rationally organized social relations. They, who personified secular power in Yekaterinburg and the Yekaterinburg department, were the true leaders of all processes, including disciplinary ones, having subordinated the church authorities in this regard. Yekaterinburg, thus, represented an almost ideal model for the embodiment of Peter the Great’s “police pathos.” Although practically all disciplinary measures of the local administration met resistance from the population in one way or another, the social environment that developed around industrial production in Yekaterinburg objectively created favorable conditions for the introduction of consistent, total and strict discipline, the results of which have yet to be assessed.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. A. RedinRussian Federation
Dmitry A. Redin, Doctor of Sciences (History), Associate Professor
Scopus Author ID 55838143300
WoS Researcher ID AA0-2947-2020
Yekaterinbur
S. N. Kopyrina
Russian Federation
Sardaana N. Kopyrina, Candidate of Sciences (History)
WoS Researcher ID DQ-8133-2017
Yekaterinbur
References
1. Akeliev E. V. Russkii Misopogon: Petr I, bradobritie i desyat’ millionov “moskovitov” [Russian Mesopogon: Peter I, the Beard-shaven and Ten Million “Muscovites”]. Moscow, NLO Publ., 2022, 624 p. (in Russ.)
2. Boshkovska N. Mir russkoi zhenshchiny semnadtsatogo stoletiya [The World of Russian Women of the Seventeenth Century]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2014, 535 p. (in Russ.)
3. Brunet S. Les prêtres des campagnes de la France du XVIIe siècle: la grande mutation. Dix Septième Siècle, 2007, no. 59 (234), pp. 49–82.
4. Buchholz W. Anfänge der Sozialdisziplinierung im Mittelalter. Die Reichsstadt Nurnberg als Beispiel. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 1991, Bd. 18, S. 129–147.
5. Dmitriev M. V. Ot khristianskoi antropologii vostochnoslavyanskikh pravoslavnykh kul’tur XV– XVI vv. k “provalu” sotsial’noi distsiplinarizatsii? [From Christian Anthropology of East Slavic Orthodox Cultures of the 15th – 16th Centuries to the “Failure” of Social Disciplinarization?]. Chinese Journal of Slavic Studies, 2022, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 14–32. (in Russ.)
6. Ekaterinburg v 1733 godu: istoriko-antropologicheskaya i arkhitekturno-prostranstvennaya rekonstruktsiya (S. I. Tsemenkova) [Yekaterinburg in 1733: Historical-anthropological and Architectural-spatial Reconstruction]. Istoriko-geograficheskii zhurnal [Historical-Geographical Journal], 2023, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 94–97. (in Russ.)
7. Florovsky G. V. Peterburgskii perevorot [The St. Petersburg Revolt]. In: Iz istorii russkoi kul’tury [From the History of the Russian Culture]. Moscow, 2000, vol. 4, p. 349–424. (in Russ.)
8. Gorski Ph. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago, Uni. of Chicago Press, 2003, 264 p.
9. Gromyko M. M. Mir russkoi derevni [The World of the Russian Village]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya, 1991, 446 p. (in Russ.)
10. Litoshenko D. A. Evolyutsiya universitetskogo obrazovaniya v Evrope XVI – kontsa XVIII vekov. Universitetskii opyt obrazovatel’noi metatraditsii na zare Novogo vremeni [The Evolution of University Education in Europe of the 16th – Late 18th Century. University Experience of Educational Meta-tradition at the Dawn of Modern Times]. Saarbrücken, LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012, 374 p. (in Russ.)
11. Lotman Yu. M. Ocherki po istorii russkoi kul’tury XVII – nachala XIX veka [Essays on the History of Russian Culture of the 17th – Early 19th Centuries]. In: Iz istorii russkoi kul’tury [From the History of the Russian Culture]. Moscow, 2000, vol. 4, p. 13–348. (in Russ.)
12. Martynenko N. K. Prostitutsiya v imperatorskoi Rossii: ot zapreta k legalizatsii [Prostitution in Imperial Russia: From Prohibition to Legalization]. Novyi istoricheskii vestnik [The New Historical Herald], 2009, no. 19, pp. 30–37. (in Russ.)
13. Oestreich G. Geist und Gestalt des frühmodernen Staates. Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Berlin, Duncker and Humblot, 1969, 355 S.
14. Po-chia Hsia R. Social Discipline in the Reformation: Central Europe, 1550–1750. London, New York, Routledge, 1989, 218 p.
15. Redin D. A. Ocharovanie “regulyarstva”: eshche raz o “mental’nom gosudarstve” Petra Velikogo. Chast’ 2. “Rossiiskoe imperskoe gosudarstvo” [The Charm of “Regularity”: Once Again About the “Mental State” of Peter the Great. Pt. 2. “The Russian Imperial State”]. Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with Time], 2021, iss. 75, p. 315–334. (in Russ.)
16. Redin D. A. Ekaterinburg generala Gennina: opyt prochteniya gorodskogo “teksta” [General Hennind’s Yekaterinburg: An Attempt at Reading the “Urban Text”]. Quaestio Rossica, 2021, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1042–1063. (in Russ.)
17. Roldugina I. Otkrytie seksual’nosti. Transgressiya sotsial’noi stikhii v seredine XVIII v. v SanktPeterburge: po materialam Kalinkinskoi komissii (1750–1759) [The Discovery of Sexuality. Transgression of Social Elements in the mid-18th Century in St. Petersburg: Based on Materials from the Kalinkin Commission (1750–1759)]. Ab Imperio, 2016, no. 2, pp. 29–69. (in Russ.)
18. Shulze W. Gerhard Ostrreich Bergiff “Sozialdisziplinienrung” in der frühen Neuzeit. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 1987, Bd. 14, S. 265–302.
19. Tsemenkova S. I., Chernoukhov A. V. Rukovoditeli apparata gornozavodskoi vlasti Urala v 20– 50-e gg. XVIII v. [Heads of the Apparatus of the Mining and Metallurgical Authorities of the Urals in the 20s – 50s of the 18th Century]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2022, 446 p. (in Russ.)
20. Weber M. Disziplinierung und Widerstand. Obrigkeit und Bauern in Schlesien 1500–1700. In: Gutsherrschaft als soziales Modell. Vergleichende Betrachtungen zur Funktionsweise frühneu-zeitlicher Agrargesellschaften. Beiheft 18. Munich, 1995, S. 419–438.
21. Winkelbauer Th. Sozialdisziplinierung und Konfessionalisierung durch Grundherren in den öster-reichischen und böhmischen Ländern im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 1992, Bd. 19, S. 317–339.
22. Zhivov V. M. Dva etapa distsiplinarnoi revolyutsii v Rossii XVII i XVIII stoletiya [Two Stages of the Disciplinary Revolution in Russia in the 17th and 18th Centuries]. Cahiers du Monde russe, 2012, no. 53 (2–3), pp. 349–374. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Redin D.A., Kopyrina S.N. The Practice of Social Discipline in Early Yekaterinburg and in the Factories of the Yekaterinburg Department (1720s – 1750s). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2025;24(1):127-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-1-127-143