Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Linguistic Hedges in Scientific Articles on Humanities

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-2-19-30

Abstract

Purpose. By using a corpus of 120 Russian scientific articles on humanities the study analyzed linguistic actualizers of hedging as a metadiscourse strategy contributing to the efficient communication between an author and a reader. The novelty of the study is determined by scarcity of metadiscourse studies on articles in Russian, while it is relevant due to the ongoing attempts to re-interpret the nature of academic discourse, which has been considered as an interactional rather than informational space. This approach determines the need to study linguistic tools that help to construct an efficient dialogue with the reader and present research results in a way that is appropriate in the scientific community. The study aims to reveal lexical and lexico-syntactic hedges and determine their frequencies and functions in the corpus of scientific articles on humanities.

Results. It was demonstrated that hedging is an integral part of academic discourse, where it mitigates the categoricalness of author’s claims by de-intensifying features under consideration, shifting the communicative focus to the emotional state or subjective nature of author’s opinions, indicating the non-absolute nature of his statements, or presenting the statements as possible ones.

Conclusion. The analysis revealed hedging to be a crucial component of effective author-reader interaction, mitigating categorical statements and conveying a nuanced understanding of the research issue. Adverbs and verbs were the most prevalent lexical hedges, while introductory constructions played a significant role in the lexico-syntactic category. These findings emphasize the importance of hedging in creating a collaborative academic discourse space.

About the Author

O. A. Boginskaya
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Boginskaya - Doctor of Sciences (Philology).

Irkutsk

Scopus Author ID 56049693200



References

1. Boginskaya О. А. Russian lexical and syntactic hedges in dissertation reviews. Russian Language Studies, 2023, vol. 21 (1), pp. 18–32.

2. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1987, 360 p.

3. Fraser B. Pragmatic Competence: the Case of Hedging. In: New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010, pp. 15–34.

4. Gergokaeva D. D. Egotsentrizm lingvisticheskogo diskursa (na materiale russkogo, angliiskogo, karachaevo-balkarskogo yazykov) [Egocentrism of linguistic discourse (on the material of Russian, English, Karachay-Balkarian languages)]. Cand. of Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2008, 181 p. (in Russ.)

5. Gnezdechko O. N. Avtorizatsiya nauchnogo diskursa: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii aspekt (na materiale angloyazychnykh statei sovremennykh evropeiskikh i amerikanskikh lingvistov) [Authorization of scientific discourse: communicative-pragmatic aspect (based on English-language articles by modern European and American linguists)]. Cand. of Philol. Sci. Diss. Kiev, 2005, 175 p. (in Russ.)

6. Haufiku N., Kangira J. An Exploration of Hedging and Boosting Devices Used in Academic Discourse Focusing on English Theses at the University of Namibia. Studies in English Language Teaching, 2018, vol. 6 (1), pp. 1–11.

7. Ivanov V. V. Chet i nechet. Asimmetriya mozga i znakovykh sistem [Even and odd. Asymmetry of the brain and sign systems]. Мoscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1978, 174 p. (in Russ.)

8. Krapivkina О. А. Yazykovye sredstva eksplikatsii sub"ekta diskursa [Language means of explication of the subject of discourse]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Vyatka State University], 2016, vol. 1, pp. 71–74. (in Russ.)

9. Lakoff J. The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p’s and q’s. In: Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society, 1973, pp. 292–305.

10. Larina T. V. Emotion and politeness in the style of blind peer-review. Aktual'nye problemy stilistiki [Actual problems of stylistics], 2019, vol. 5, pp. 40–46. (in Russ.)

11. Milyanchuk N. S. Sredstva vyrazheniya nekategorichnosti vyskazyvaniya v nauchnom stile rechi [Means of expressing the noncategoricalness of an utterance in a scientific style of speech]. In: Social'no-ekonomicheskie i politicheskie processy v stranah Aziatsko-Tihookeanskogo regiona [Socio-economic and political processes in the countries of the Asia-Pacific region]. Vladivostok, Far Eastern Uni. Press, 1997, pp. 107–108. (in Russ.)

12. Nagorny I. A. Grammatiko-kommunikativnye funktsii russkikh chastits v rechevoi sfere [Grammatical-communicative functions of the Russian particles in the speech sphere]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Humanities series], 2019, vol. 38 (3), pp. 369–378. (in Russ.)

13. Rutskaya E. A., Zvyagina V. V. Nekategorichnost' v nauchnykh stat'yakh tekhnicheskoi tematiki [Non-categoricity in technical scientific articles]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological sciences. Issues of theory and practice], 2018, vol. 12-2 (90), pp. 371–375. (in Russ.)

14. Takimoto M. A Corpus-Based Analysis of Hedges and Boosters in English Academic Articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2015, vol. 5 (1), pp. 95–105.

15. Varttala T. Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse: Exploring Variatio. Tampere, Uni. of Tampere Press, 2001, 342 p.

16. Viktorova E. Yu. Vspomogatel'naya sistema diskursa: problemy vydeleniya i spetsifiki funktsionirovaniya [Auxiliary system of discourse: problems of identification and specifics of functioning]. Cand. of Philol. Sci. Diss. Saratov, 2016, 617 p. (in Russ.)

17. Volf E. M. Funktionalnaya semantika otsenki [Functional semantics of assessment]. Moscow, Librokom, 2014, 284 p. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Boginskaya O.A. Linguistic Hedges in Scientific Articles on Humanities. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2025;24(2):19-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-2-19-30

Views: 175


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)