Mechanical-Workmanship Fine-Hide Perforation with a Bone Needle: Interpretation of Experimental Results
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-3-9-19
Abstract
Purpose. The experiments aimed at reconstruction of ancient sewing/needlework processes date back to the end of the 20th century. The purpose of the research is obtaining and analysing the traces of utilisation, along with the dynamics and specifics of their formation on a bone needle (with a vegetable-fibre thread) in the conditions of a small number of perforation holes on a fragment of fine mechanical-workmanship hide.
Results. The study presents the results of the manufacture and the use of a sewing toolkit in the conditions close to the historical reality of ancient times. The needle is made of a mammoth tusk splinter; the hare hide is carefully processed to a soft state without resorting to any reagents – mechanically; the fastening material – a thread of vegetable origin – is made as based on already known archaeological samples. The result of using a bone needle was represented by the formation of a slight glossing over the entire surface of the needle, micro damage of the instrument tip with a characteristic “tongue-type” fracture, flattened relief of the needlework technological traces and the formation of linear, radial utilisation traces in the working perimeter of the thread.
Conclusion. Several conclusions are made. Firstly, craftsmen of the Paleolithic period worked with fine-workmanship hides; the treatment could be made in a simple mechanical manner. Secondly, perforation with very thin needles without significant losses and modification of their shape, without the use of auxiliary technical devices as well as application of man’s physical effort is possible. Thirdly, vegetable fibre could act as a binding material – its use leaves characteristic signs of wear.
Keywords
experimental archaeology,
experimental perforation,
tusk needle,
mechanical-workmanship fine-hide,
utilisation traces
УДК: 903.01/.09; 903.014
About the Authors
I. V. Schmidt
Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Schmidt, Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor
Omsk, Russian Federation
A. D. Kerik
Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna D. Kerik
Omsk, Russian Federation
References
1. Anghelinu M., Мărgărit M., Niță L. A Paleolithic eyed needle from Bistricioara-Lutărie III (Ceahlău Basin, Northeastern Romania). Studii de Preistorie, 2017, no. 14, pp. 27–35.
2. Buc N. Experimental series and use-wear in bone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011, no. 38, pp. 546–557.
3. Campana D. V. Natufian and Protoneolithic bone tools: The Manufacture and Use of Bone Implements in the Zagros and the Levant. British Archaeological Reports, International Series. Oxford, 1989, vol. 494, 156 p.
4. Chkhatarashvili G. Final'nyi verkhnii paleolit v peshchere Dzudzuana [The Final Upper Paleolithic in the Dzuzuana Cave]. Tyragetia, 2016, vol. 10 (25), no. 1, pp. 75–79. (in Russ.)
5. Derevyanko A. P., Shunkov M. V., Kozlikin M. B., Fedorchenko A. Yu., Pavlenok G. D., Belousova N. E. Kostyanaya igla nachala verkhnego paleolita iz tsentral'nogo zala Denisovoi peshchery (po materialam raskopok v 2016 godu) [Bone needle of the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic from the central hall of Denisova Cave (based on the materials of excavations in 2016)]. In: Problemy arheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredel'nykh territorii [Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories]. Novosibirsk, IAET SB RAS Publ., 2016, vol. 21, pp. 72–75. (in Russ.)
6. D’Errico F. La vie sociale de L’Art mobilier paléolithique. Manipulation, transport, suspension der objets on os, bon de cervidés, ivoire. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 1993, no. 12 (2), pp. 145–174.
7. D’Errico F., Backwell L. R., Wadley L. Identifying regional variability in Middle Stone Age bone technology: The case of Sibudu Cave. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2012, no. 39, pp. 2479–2495.
8. D’Errico F., Doyon L., Zhang S., Baumann M., Lazni M., Lázničková-Galetová M., Gao X., Chen F., Zhang Y. The origin and evolution of sewing technologies in Eurasia and North America. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, no. 125, pp. 71–86.
9. D’Errico F., Julien M., Liolios D., Vanhaeren M., Baffier D. Many awls in our argument. Bone tool manufacture and use from the Chatelperronian and Aurignacian layers of the Grotte du Renne at Arcy-sur-Cur. In: Proceedings of Symposium of the XIV Congress of the UISPP (University of Liege, Belgium, September 2–8, 2001). Lisboa, Instituto Portugues de Arqueologia, 2003, pp. 247–270.
10. Fedorchenko A. Yu., Belousova N. E. Khronologiya i kul'turnaya atributsiya drevneishikh kostyanykh igl verkhnego paleolita Sibiri [Chronology and Cultural Attribution of the Earliest Upper Palaeolithic Bone Needles of Siberia]. Stratum plus, 2021, no. 1, pp. 217–257. (in Russ.)
11. Hardy B. L., Moncel M.-H., Kerfant C., Lebon M., Bellot-Gurlet L., Mélard N. Direct evidence of Neanderthal fibre technology and its cognitive and behavioral implications. Scientific Reports, 2020, no. 10 (1): 4889, pp. 1–10.
12. Khlopachev G. A. (ed.). Verkhnii paleolit: obrazy, simvoly, znaki. Katalog predmetov iskusstva malykh form i unikal'nykh nakhodok verkhnego paleolita iz arkheologicheskogo sobraniya MAE RAN [Upper Paleolithic: images, symbols, signs. Catalog of small-form art objects and unique Upper Paleolithic finds from the archaeological collection of the MAE RAS]. St. Petersburg, Ekstraprint, 2016, 384 p. (in Russ.)
13. Kvavadze Е., Bar-Yosef O., Belfer-Cohen A., Boaretto E., Jakeli N., Matskevich Z., Meshveliani T. 30,000-Year-Old Wild Flax Fibers. Science, 2009, vol. 325, no. 11, iss. 5946, p. 1359.
14. Miguel J., Cáceres T. El aprovechamiento no alimentario de las materias duras animales en la vertiente sur pirenaica durante el Tardiglaciar. Una visión de síntesis. Prehistoria y Arqueología, Serie I, 2003–2004, vol. 16–17, pp. 99–117.
15. Pétillon J.-M. First evidence of a whale bone industry in the western European Upper Paleolithic: Magdalenian artifacts from Isturitz (Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France). Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, no. 54 (5), pp.720–726.
16. Polyushkin N. G. Osnovy teorii treniya, iznosa i smazki [Fundamentals of the theory of friction, wear and lubrication]. Textbook. Krasnoyarsk, KrasSAU Press, 2013, 192 р. (in Russ.)
17. Rukina N. S. Shveinyi inventar' na paleoliticheskikh stoyankakh Rossii [Sewing equipment at Paleolithic sites in Russia]. Arheologiya Evraziiskikh stepei [Archaeology of the Eurasian steppes], 2020, no. 5, рp. 33–38. (in Russ.)
18. Semenov S. A. Pervobytnaya tekhnika (opyt izucheniya drevneyshikh orudii i izdelii po sledam raboty) [Primitive technique (experience of studying the oldest tools and products on the traces of work)]. Moscow, Leningrad, AS USSR Publ., 1957, 240 p. (in Russ.) (Materials and research on the archaeology of the USSR, № 54)
19. Semenov S. A. Tekhnika obrabotki kosti v paleolite [Bone processing techniques in the Paleolithic]. Moscow, AS USSR Publ., 1957, vol. 13, pp. 366–373. (in Russ.)
20. Shmidt I. V., Kovalchenko E. A. Rezul'taty eksperimenta po ispol'zovaniyu kostyanoi igly dlya perforatsii shkury gruboi vydelki [Experimental Results of Using the Bone Needle for Punching Rough-Workmanship Hides]. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2022. vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 20–31. (in Russ.)
21. Stone E. A. Through the eve of Needle: Invertigtions of Ethnographic, Experimental, and Archaeological bone tool use wear from perishable technologies: Dissertation submitted in Parital Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anthropology. New Mexico, Uni. of New Mexico Press, 2011, 588 p.
22. Stordeur-Yedid D. Les aiguilles a chas au Paléolithique. Gallia Préhistorique, Suppl. XIII, 1979, 216 р.
23. Tejero J.-M., Avezuela B., Maicas R., Cacho C. Osseous Material Industry from the Magdalenian Levels of La Peña de Estebanvela (Segovia). A Preliminary Technological Study. In: Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of the ICAZ Worked Bone Research Group in Salzburg 2011. Salzburg, 2013, pp. 237–249.
24. Tortosa J., Guillem P-J., Yolanda C. M., Joan R. S., Jesús F., Carles M. E., Carlos V. C. Cordage, basketry and containers at the Pleistocene – Holocene boundary in southwest Europe. Evidence from Coves de Santa Maira (Valencian region, Spain). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2020, no. 29, pp. 582–594.
25. Vasilevich G. M. Evenki. Istoriko-etnograficheskie ocherki (XVIII – nachalo ХХ v.) [Evenki. Historical and ethnographic essays (18th – early 20th century)]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1969, 304 p. (in Russ.)
26. Zhukova L. N. Odezhda yukagirov [Yukagir’s clothes]. Textbook. Yakutsk, 1996, 142 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Schmidt I.V., Kerik A.D. Mechanical-Workmanship Fine-Hide Perforation with a Bone Needle: Interpretation of Experimental Results. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2025;24(3):9-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-3-9-19
Views:
244
Email this article 