On the Use of Bone Points of the Early Neolithic Settlement Mergen 6 (According to Traceological Research and Experiment)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-3-34-45
Abstract
Purpose. The practice of applying images (tattoos) to the human body has a long history, encompassing both traditional cultures and modern forms. The earliest instruments utilized for the introduction of coloring pigments beneath the human skin were pointed bone tools. The use of points made from tubular bones of birds and small animals was documented in Eurasia and America as early as the Mesolithic-Eneolithic period.
Results. A typological and trace analysis of bone points from the early Neolithic layer of Mergen 6 settlement in the Lower Ishim River Region revealed that they were employed as punctures and needles for stitching leather, skins, and other materials. It seems reasonable to posit that points made from tubular bones of birds and small animals could also be used for applying tattoos. This is indicated by a number of signs found on the tools, which are considered to be traces of wear due to their use for tattooing. However, it is our contention that the products under consideration, along with the aforementioned signs, can also bear traces of manufacture and of their possible use for other purposes. The interpretation of these traces is challenging, as they are difficult to separate and unambiguously discern. In light of these considerations, the potential for trace studies to assess the use of points made from tubular bird bones appears constrained. We believe it is appropriate to conduct an experiment to test our hypothesis. In our case, we attempted to apply an image to human skin using points made in the likeness of the original Mergen products.
Conclusion. The results of the trace analysis and the experiment, along with morphological and typological parameters, allow us to suggest with a high degree of probability that some of the bone points were utilized as tools for applying tattoos.
Keywords
Western Siberia,
Lower Ishim river region,
settlement Mergen 6,
Early Neolithic bone products,
piercings,
needles,
points made of tubular bird bones
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (no. FWRZ-2021-0006)
About the Author
V. A. Zakh
Tyumen Scientific Centre of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor A. Zakh, Doctor of Sciences (History)
Scopus Author ID 14627989000
WoS Researcher ID I-4518-2018
Tyumen, Russian Federation
References
1. Barkova L. L., Pankova S. V. Tatuirovka na mumiyakh iz Bol'shikh Pazyrykskikh kurganov (novye materialy) [Tattoo on mummies from the Greater Pazyryk Mounds (new materials)]. Arheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archeology, ethnography and anthropology of Eurasia], 2005, no. 2 (22), pp. 95−102. (in Russ.)
2. Derevyanko A. P., Shunkov M. V., Kozlikin M. B., Fedorchenko A. Yu., Pavlenok G. D., Belousova N. E. Kostyanaya igla nachala verkhnego paleolita iz tsentral'nogo zala Denisovoi peshchery (po materialam raskopok v 2016 godu) [Bone needle of the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic from the central hall of the Denisova Cave (based on materials from excavations in 2016)]. In: Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredel'nykh territorii [Problems of archeology, ethnography, anthropology of Siberia and adjacent territories]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2016, vol. 22, pp. 72–75. (in Russ.)
3. Deter-Wolf A., Peres T. M., Karacic S. Ancient Native American bone tattooing tools and pigments: Evidence from central Tennessee. Archaeological Science, 2021, vol. 37. DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103002
4. Deter-Wolf A., Robitaille B., Krutak L., Galliot S. The worldʼs oldest tattoos. Archaeological Science, 2016, vol. 5, pp. 19−24. DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.11.007
5. Friedman R., Antoine D., Talamo S., Reimer P. J., Taylor J. H., Wills B., Mannino M. A. Natural mummies from Pre-dynastic Egypt reveal the worldʼs earliest figural tattoos. Archaeological Science, 2018, vol. 92, pp. 116−125. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2018.02.002
6. Gates St-Pierre C. Needles and bodies: A microwear analysis of experimental bone tattooing implements. J. Archaeol. Sci., 2018, rep. 20, pp. 881–887. DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.10.027
7. Kononenko N. A. Middle and late Holocene skin-working tools in Melanesia: Tattooing and scarification? Archaeology in Oceania, 2012, vol. 47, iss. 1, pp. 14–28.
8. Kyzlasov L. R., Pankova S. V. Tatuirovki drevnei mumii iz Khakasii (rubezh nashei ery) [Tattoos of an ancient mummy from Khakassia (the turn of our era)]. Sbornik Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha [Collection of the State Hermitage], 2004, vol. 62, pp. 61–67. (in Russ.)
9. Molodin V. I. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya kharakteristika pogrebal'nogo kompleksa kurgana № 3 pamyatnika Verkh-Kal'dzhin 2 [Cultural and historical characteristics of the burial complex of mound No. 3 of the Verkh-Kaldzhin 2 monument]. In: Fenomen altaiskikh mumii [Phenomenon of Altai mummies]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2000, pp. 86−119. (in Russ.)
10. Molodin V. I., Hansen S., Nenakhov D. A., Rainhold S., Nenakhova Yu. N., Nesterova M. S., Durakov I. A., Mylnikova L. N., Kobeleva L. S., Vasiliev S. K. Novye dannye o neoliticheskikh kompleksakh na pamyatnike Tartas-1 [New data on Neolithic complexes at the Tartas-1 monument]. In: Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredel'nykh territorii [Problems of archeology, ethnography, anthropology of Siberia and adjacent territories]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2016, vol. 22, pp. 135–140. (in Russ.)
11. Oshibkina S. V. Mezolit Vostochnogo Prionezh'ya. Kul'tura Veret'e [Mesolithic of the Eastern Onega region. Veretye culture]. Moscow, Nauka, 2006, 324 p. (in Russ.)
12. Oshibkina S. V. Veret'e 1. Poselenie epokhi mezolita na severe Vostochnoi Evropy [Veretye 1. Mesolithic settlement in the North of Eastern Europe]. Moscow, Nauka, 1997, 204 p. (in Russ.)
13. Polosmak N. V. Tatuirovka u pazyryktsev [Tattoo among the Pazyryk people]. Arheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archeology, ethnography and anthropology of Eurasia], 2000, no. 4 (4), pp. 95−102. (in Russ.)
14. Polosmak N. V. Vsadniki Ukoka [Riders of Ukok]. Novosibirsk, Infolio-press, 2001. (in Russ.)
15. Ponkratova I. Yu., Gubar Yu. S., Lbova L. V. Spektral'nyi analiz okrashennykh artefaktov sloya VII stoyanki Ushki-V (poluostrov Kamchatka) [Spectral analysis of painted artifacts of layer VII of the Ushki-V site (Kamchatka Peninsula)]. Universum Humanitarium, 2019, no. 1, pp. 56–71. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/2499-9997-2019-1-56-71
16. Ponkratova I. Yu., Gubar Yu. S., Volkov P. V., Lbova L. V. Okrashennye artefakty stoyanki Ushki-V (poluostrov Kamchatka) [Painted artifacts from the Ushki-V site (Kamchatka Peninsula)]. In: Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta material'noi kul'tury [Brief Communications of the Institute of Material Culture]. Moscow, 2020, vol. 261, pp. 50–66. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25681/IARAS.0130–2620.261
17. Rudenko S. I. Kul'tura naseleniya Gornogo Altaya v skifskoe vremya [Culture of the population of Gorny Altai in Scythian times]. Moscow, Leningrad, AS USSR Publ., 1953, 401 p. (in Russ.)
18. Shalagina A. V., Boman M., Kolobova K. A., Krivoshapkin A. I. Kostyanye igly iz verkhnepaleoliticheskikh kompleksov Strashnoi peshchery (Severo-Zapadnyi Altai) [Bone needles from the Upper Paleolithic complexes of the Scary Cave (North-western Altai)]. Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovanii [Theory and practice of archaeological research], 2018, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 89–98. (in Russ.) DOI 10.14258/tpai(2018)1(21).-07
19. Skochina S. N. Kamennaya i kostyanaya industriya v epokhu neolita lesostepnogo Priishim'ya [Stone and bone industry in the Neolithic era of the Forest-Steppe of the Ishim region]. Cand. Hist. Sci. Diss. Tyumen, 2017, 321 p. (in Russ.)
20. Slavinsky V. S., Akimova E. A., Lysenko D. N., Tomilova E. A., Kuksa E. N., Drozdov N. I., Anoikin A. A., Artemiev E. V., Galukhin L. L., Bogdanov E. S., Stepanov N. S., Grevtsov Yu. A., Lomov P. K., Dudko A. A. Kostyanaya industriya stoyanki Afontova Gora II (po rezul'tatam raskopok 2014 goda) [Bone industry of the Afontova Gora II site (based on the results of excavations in 2014)]. In: Problemy arkheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredel'nykh territorii [Problems of archeology, ethnography, anthropology of Siberia and adjacent territories]. Novosibirsk, IAE SB RAS Publ., 2014, vol. 20, pp. 435–437. (in Russ.)
21. Vinogradov N. B. (ed.). Drevnee Ust'e: ukreplennoe poselenie bronzovogo veka v Yuzhnom Zaural'e [Ancient Ustye: a fortified Bronze Age settlement in the Southern Trans-Urals]. Chelyabinsk, Abris Publ., 2013. (in Russ.)
22. Zakh V. A. O primenenii smolistykh veshchestv v praktikakh rannego neolita v lesostepnom Priishim'e [On the use of resinous substances in the practices of the Early Neolithic in the foreststeppe Ishim region]. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Bulletin of Archeology, Anthropology and Ethnography], 2019, no. 4 (47), pp. 5–14. (in Russ.) DOI 10.20874/2071-0437-2019-47-4-1
23. Zaibert V. F. Botaiskaya kul'tura [Botai culture]. Almaty, KazAkparat Publ., 2009, 576 p. (in Russ.)
24. Zhilin M. G. Kostyanaya industriya mezolita lesnoi zony Vostochnoi Evropy [Bone industry of the Mesolithic forest zone of Eastern Europe]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2001, 328 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Zakh V.A. On the Use of Bone Points of the Early Neolithic Settlement Mergen 6 (According to Traceological Research and Experiment). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2025;24(3):34-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-3-34-45
Views:
34
Email this article 