Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Paleolithic Complex of the Miệng Hổ Site and Its Place in the Nguom Culture

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-3-46-52

Abstract

Purpose. A unique place in the archeology of the Paleolithic of Southeast Asia is occupied by the Nguomian culture which specificity lies in the predominance of tools made on flakes in the technical and typological complex. Despite the fact that the main sites of this culture, the Nguom rockshelter, was discovered in 1981, the discovery of special archaeological material different from the Hoa Binh and Son Vi cultures occurred much earlier and is associated primarily with the materials of the Miệng Hổ rockshelter. Information about the stone inventory of this site is very fragmentary in Russian publications. The purpose of this study is to determine the technical and typological characteristics of one of the key sites of the Nguom industry – the Miệng Hổ rockshelter.
Results. The collection of the Miệng Hổ rockshelter, obtained as a result of three years of excavations (1972–1973, 1980), contains 998 specimens, of which 631 items are industrial waste. Also, in the collection there is a group of artifacts in the amount of 131 objects, after studying which it was concluded that these tools were multifunctional, combining the functions of chippers, graters, and possibly hammers. 34 objects were represented by large-sized pebble tools. There is a small group of side scrapers made on large flakes, with retouching on the ventral and proximal sides. The large group of scrapers (137 specimens) is very diverse. The following types are presented: side scrapers with a backing, side scrapers without a backing, scrapers with a ¾ perimeter blade, double and oval scrapers. The largest group is end scrapers (62 specimens). The next most representative group is the group of punctures and checks (65 specimens). All of them are distinguished by the presence of “shoulders” at the base of a sharp sting created by intensive retouching.
Conclusion. A technical and typological analysis of the entire studied complex shows that the system of production of small flakes and flake tools played a more significant role in the overall technological strategy, while large pebble tools were also preserved throughout most of the studied period. In general, the tool component of Miệng Hổ is similar to the tool set of the Nguom rockshelter, with which Vietnamese researchers quite rightly drew analogies.

About the Author

A. V. Kandyba
Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Kandyba, Candidate of Sciences (History)
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation



References

1. Anisyutkin N. K., Timofeev V. I. Paleoliticheskaya industriya na otshchepakh na territorii V'etnama [Paleolithic industry on flakes in Vietnam]. Archeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia, 2006, no. 3, pp. 16–24. (in Russ.)

2. Boriskovsky P. I. Arkheologiya vo V'etname v nashi dni [Archeology in Vietnam today]. Soviet archeology, 1977, no. 4, pp. 183–191. (in Russ.)

3. Colani M. Quelques Stations Hoabinhiennes. Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient – Persée, 1929, vol. 29, pp. 261–272.

4. Colani М. L'Age de la pierre dans la province de Ноа Binh. Memoires du service Geologique de L'Indochine, 1927, vol. 14 (1), pp. 230–239.

5. Derevyanko A. P., Vasiliev S. A., Markin S. V. Paleolitovedenie: vvedenie i osnovy [Paleolithic Studies: Introduction and Fundamentals]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1994, 287 p. (in Russ.)

6. Hа V. T. Van khoa Shonvi [Van hoa Son Vi] Son Vi culture. Kkhao ko khok [Кhао со hoc] Archaeology, 1971, pp. 11–12. (in Viet.)

7. Ha V. T. The Late Pleistocene climate in Southeast Asia: new data from Vietnam. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia, 1985, vol. 9, pp. 81–86.

8. Ha V. T. Kai Ngkhe Nguom chong mot foi kan' rong khon [Ky Nghe Nguom trong mot phoi canh rong hon] Nguom industry in a broad perspective. Kkhao ko khok [Кhао со hoc] Archaeology. 1988, no. 3, рр. 36-43. (in Viet.)

9. Ha V. T. The Hoabinhian and before. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 1997, vol. 16, pp. 35–41.

10. На V. T., Nguyễn K. S. Van hoa Son Vi muoi nam sau khi phat hien [Shawnwee culture 10 years after the discovery]. Кhао со hoc [Archaeology], 1978, no. 4, pp. 37–50. (in Viet.)

11. Kandyba A. V., Nguyen K. Sh., Chekha A. M., Nguyen Z. D. Paleolithic Nguom culture of Northern Vietnam. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2024, vol. 23, no. 3: Archaeology and Ethnography, p. 62–73. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-3-62-73

12. Nguyen D. T. Fo bao tu fan khoa ko tuoi Pleistotsen (Q3) o mai da Nguom [Phở bào tử phấn hoa có tuổi Ple-it-xto-xen-thuong (Q3) ở Mái đá Ngườm (Bắc Thái)] Spore-pollen analysis of Pleistocene deposits (Q3) of the Nguom rockshelter. Nkhung fat khiem moi ve Kkhao ko khok [Những phát hiệm mới vế Кhао со hoc] New discoveries in archeology, 1982, pp. 40–41. (in Viet.)

13. Nguyen K. S. Kul'tura Shonvi i ee mesto v kamennom veke Yugo-Vostochnoi Azii [Son Vi culture and its place in the Stone Age of Southeast Asia]. Soviet archeology, 1982, no. 3, pp. 5–12. (in Russ.)

14. Nguyen T. M. H., Marwick B. Ket kva fan tik fan khoa di ti mai da Nguom [Kết quả phân tích phân hoa di chỉ mái đá Ngườm (Than Sa, Thai Nguyen)] Results of spore-pollen analysis of sediments of the Nguom rockshelter (Than Sa, Thai Nguyen). Nkhung fat khiem moi ve Kkhao ko khok [Những phát hiệm mới vế Кhао со hoc] New discoveries in archeology, 2018, рр. 46–49. (in Viet.)

15. Quang V. C., Trinh N. C., Ngo T. P., Bui V. T., Hoang N. D. Tkhansya, nkhung di tik kua nguoi tkhoi dai do da [Thần Sa, những di tích của người thời đại đồ đá] Tangxia, relics of stone age people. Bac Thai, 1981, 176 p. (in Viet.)


Review

For citations:


Kandyba A.V. Paleolithic Complex of the Miệng Hổ Site and Its Place in the Nguom Culture. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2025;24(3):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-3-46-52

Views: 56


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)