Zoomorphic Sculptures of the Late Bronze Age from the Lower Irtysh Region: Morphology Peculiarities.
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-7-97-107
Abstract
Purpose. Morphological features of zoomorphic clay sculptures from the Lower Pritishye region, specifically from the Chilimka microdistrict and Luchkino I settlements, were analyzed. Ten whole and nine fragmented sculptures found in complexes with comb-pit ceramics were studied. A 3D modelling method using a RangeVision Pro laser scanner was employed to study the sculptures. Results. There are three types of clay sculptures: bears, foxes and birds. The types are internally divided into subtypes and variants, each of which has its own unique features: differences in shape, degree of stylization, presence of holes and notches for fixing, and ornamentation. All bear figurines are united by the detailing of the muzzle, emphasis on the nose and eyes, and technical methods of ornamentation-dimpled indentations and dashing. The objects could have been used as part of various complex compositions. Fragmented sculptures indicate the replicability of this image and may testify to the presence of a tradition of ritual spoilage of these items. The sculptural image of a fox is unique. Despite the high level of stylization, it shows the characteristic features of this predator. Images of birds are also stylized, but they are united by the presence of anatomical details the highlighted head, beak, tail and open wings. The figurines were decorated with the same technical methods of ornamentation. The presence of holes for fastenings indicates that these pieces could have been used in various compositions. Figurines of subtype 2 reflect at-tempts to convey the dynamics of movement. Conclusion. The analyzed collection finds analogues in the materials of the Late Bronze Age of Western Siberia. This is especially characteristic of bear and bird figurines. Stylistically similar sculptures were found on the sites of the lozvino, atlym and barsovo cultures. Animal sculptures of different types had different functional and ritual functions.
Supporting agencies: The study was supported of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 23-18-00424, https://rscf.ru/project/23-18-00424
About the Authors
D. V. Selin
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitrii V. Selin, Candidate of Sciences (History)
Yu. P. Chemyakin
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuriy P. Chemyakin, Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor
References
1. Chemyakin Yu. P. Barsova Gora: ocherki arkheologii Surgutskogo Priob'ya. Drevnost' [Barsova Gora: Essays on the Archaeology of Surgut Priob'ye. Antiquity]. Surgut; Omsk, Omskii dom pechati Publ., 2008, 224 p. (in Russ.)
2. Gerasimov Yu. A. Lisitsa [Fox]. Moscow, Zagotizdat Publ., 1950, 88 p. (in Russ.)
3. Glushkov I. G. Poselenie Luchkino I – pamyatnik pozdnei bronzy nizovii Irtysha [The settlement of Luchkino I – a site of the Late Bronze Age in the lower reaches of the Irtysh]. In: Istochniki ehtnokul'turnoi istorii Zapadnoi Sibiri [Sources of ethnocultural history of Western Siberia]. Tyumen, TyumSU Press, 1991, pp. 93–103. (in Russ.)
4. Glushkov I. G., Sobolnikova T. N. Keramicheskie kompleksy nizovii Kondy epokhi rannei bronzy: analiz i interpretatsiya dekorativnykh i tekhnologicheskikh standartov [Ceramic complexes of the lower reaches of the Konda of the Early Bronze Age: analysis and interpretation of decorative and technological standards]. In: Istochniki po arkheologii Zapadnoi Sibiri [Sources on the archeology of Western Siberia]. Surgut, SurSPU Press, 2005, pp. 45–65. (in Russ.)
5. Glushkov I. G., Zakhozhaya T. M. Keramika epokhi pozdnei bronzy Nizhnego Priirtysh'ya [Ceramics of the Late Bronze Age of the Lower Priirtyshye]. Surgut, 2000, 200 p. (in Russ.) Glushkov I. G., Zakhozhaya T. M. Obrazy v melkoi glinyanoi plastike [Images in small clay plastics]. In: Igor Gennadievich Glushkov: sbornik izbrannykh statei [Igor Gennadievich Glush kov: collection of selected articles]. Surgut, SurSPU Press, 2011, vol. 2, p. 53. (in Russ.)
6. Gurina N. N. Vodoplavayushchaya ptitsa v iskusstve neoliticheskikh lesnykh plemen [Waterfowl in the art of Neolithic forest tribes]. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Short messages of the Institute of Archaeology], 1972, iss. 131, pp. 36–45. (in Russ.)
7. Koksharov S. F. Skul'ptury zhivotnykh bronzovogo veka iz taezhnogo Priob'ya [Animal sculptures of the Bronze Age from the taiga Priobie]. Archaeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia, 2014, no. 2, pp. 77–81. (in Russ.)
8. Kosinskaya L. L. Chernorechenskoe I – poselenie epokhi bronzy v g. Surgute [Chernorechenskoe I – settlement of the Bronze Age in Surgut]. In: Arkheologiya Zapadnoi Sibiri [Archaeology of Western Siberia]. Nizhnevartovsk, NizhPSI Press, 1998, pp. 87–102. (in Russ.)
9. Molodin V. I. Drevnee iskusstvo Zapadnoi Sibiri (Ob'-Irtyshskaya lesostep') [Ancient Art of Western Siberia (Ob-Irtysh forest-steppe)]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1992, 191 p. (in Russ.)
10. Moshinskaya V. I. Drevnyaya skul'ptura Urala i Zapadnoi Sibiri [Ancient sculpture of the Urals and Western Siberia]. Moscow, 1976, 132 p. (in Russ.)
11. Pogodin A. A., Trufanov A. Ya. Pamyatnik loz'vinskoi kul'tury na poselenii Bol'shaya Umyt'ya 100 [Site of the lozvino culture at the settlement Bolshaya Umytia 100]. In: Arkheologiya i istoriya Severo-Zapadnoi Sibiri [Archaeology and History of North-West Siberia]. Nefteyugansk, Ekaterinburg, Ural'skii rabochii Publ., 2017, pp. 59–88. (in Russ.)
12. Serikov Yu. B. Ocherki po pervobytnomu iskusstvu Urala [Essays on the primitive art of the Urals]. Nizhnii Tagil, NizhSPA Press, 2014, 268 p. (in Russ.)
13. Skorobogatova A. Yu., Kardash O. V. Novye nakhodki keramicheskoi skul'ptury v Surgutskom Priob'e [New finds of ceramic sculpture in Surgut Priobye]. In: Trudy VI (XXII) Vserossiiskogo arkheologicheskogo s"ezda v Samare [Proceedings of the VI (XXII) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Samara]. Samara, SamSSPU Press, 2020, vol. 3, pp. 101–103. (in Russ.)
14. Sobolnikova T. N., Kuzina A. V. Arkheologicheskie issledovaniya v nizhnem techenii r. Kondy v 2018–2019 gg. [Archaeological research in the lower reaches of the Konda River in 2018– 2019]. In: Arkheologicheskie otkrytiya – 2019 [Archaeological discoveries – 2019]. Moscow, IA RAS Publ., 2021, pp. 380–384. (in Russ.)
15. Usacheva I. V. K istokam mirovozzreniya drevnikh ural'tsev (po materialam melkoi glinyanoi i kremnevoi plastiki ehpokhi neolita – bronzy oz. Andreevskogo Tyumenskoi oblasti) [Toward the Origins of the Worldview of the Ancient Urals (on the materials of small clay and flint plastics of the Neolithic-Bronze epoch of Lake Andreevsky, Tyumen region)]. In: Voprosy arkheologii Urala [Problems of Archeology of the Urals]. Ekaterinburg, UrSU Press, 1998, vol. 23, pp. 105–134. (in Russ.)
16. Vasilevsky R. S., Okladnikov A. P. Izobrazheniya medvedei v neoliticheskom iskusstve Severnoi Azii [Images of bears in the Neolithic art of North Asia]. In: Zveri v kamne [Beasts in stone]. Novosibirsk, 1980, pp. 230–238. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Selin D.V., Chemyakin Yu.P. Zoomorphic Sculptures of the Late Bronze Age from the Lower Irtysh Region: Morphology Peculiarities. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2025;24(7):97-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-7-97-107
Views:
14
Email this article 