Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

“Artist’s Notes” as a Form of Literary and Pictorial Self-Reflection in L. Rzhevsky’s Novel “Dina”

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-9-117-126

Abstract

Purpose. The article presents the results of a study on the plot of a letter in the novel by the writer of the second wave of Russian emigration L. Rzhevsky Dina (1979) as a literary and pictorial self-reflection of the hero. The study uses structural and intermedial analysis methods. 

Results. A hypothesis is made about the author’s tasks in the novel: on the one hand, self-disclosure of the inner world of the artist, the bearer of a picturesque vision of the world, on the other hand, “estrangement” of literary creativity by the reflection of a writing amateur. The functions of keeping notes: self-knowledge and knowledge of another, overcoming loneliness and moving towards literary creativity, reflection of one's own paintings and ideas (autoekphrasis).

It is shown that in the creative collision of the hero, the most significant is the main, unfinished picture – “The Winner” – an expression of the worldview, a sense of the integrity of the universe. The unrealized concepts are partially compensated by notes, in which different versions of the unfinished picture are recorded.

Conclusion. The novel is an expression of the author’s aesthetic position: the rejection of (post)modernism and socialist realism, which equally distort reality, and the affirmation of 20th century realism, which seeks a spiritual vertical and is aware of the complexity and infinity of the universe, in which man is neither the owner nor the “winner”.

About the Author

I. I. Nazarenko
National Research Tomsk State University
Russian Federation

Ivan I. Nazarenko, Candidate of Sciences (Philology)

RSCI Author ID 1208794 

Tomsk



References

1. Agenosov V. V. “Pokazavshemu nam svet...”: Leonid Rzhevsky (Surazhevsky) [“To the One Who Showed Us the Light...”: Leonid Rzhevsky (Surazhevsky)]. Vestnik RAEN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences], 2015, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 104–110. (in Russ.)

2. Geller L. Ehkfrasis, ili Obnazhenie priema. Neskol’ko voprosov i tezis [The Resurrection of a Concept, or A Word on Ekphrasis. Several Questions and a Thesis] In: “Nevyrazimo vyrazimoe”: ehkfrasis i problemy reprezentatsii vizual'nogo v khudozhestvennom tekste [“The Inexpressibly Expressible”: Ekphrasis and Problems of Representation of the Visual in a Fiction Text]. Collection of Articles. Moscow, NLO Publ., 2013, pp. 44–60. (in Russ.)

3. Geller L. Voskreshenie ponyatiya, ili Slovo ob ehkfrasise [The Resurrection of a Concept or a Word on Ekphrasis]. In: Ehkfrasis v russkoi literature: trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma [Ekphrasis in Russian Literature: Proceedings of the Lausanne Symposium]. Moscow, MIK Publ., 2002, pp. 5–22. (in Russ.)

4. Khogart U. Analiz krasoty [The Analysis of Beauty]. Leningrad, Iskusstvo Publ., 1987, 254 p. (in Russ.)

5. Konovalov A. A. Tvorcheskii put’ L. D. Rzhevskogo (Surazhevskogo) [The Creative Path of L. D. Rzhevsky (Surazhevsky)]. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2000, 329 p. (in Russ.)

6. Lessing G. E. Laokoon, ili O granitsakh zhivopisi i poezii [Laocoon, or On the Limits of Painting and Poetry]. Moscow, IZOGIZ Publ., 1933, 204 p. (in Russ.)

7. Nikolyukin A. N. (ed.). Literaturnaya entsiklopediya terminov i ponyatii [Literary Encyclopedia of Terms and Concepts]. Moscow, Intelvak Publ., 2001, 1600 p. (in Russ.)

8. Perruchot A. Sezann [Cezanne]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 1966, 368 p. (in Russ.)

9. Rubins M. “Plasticheskaya radost’ krasoty”: Ekfrasis v tvorchestve akmeistov i evropeiskaya traditsiya [“The Plastic Joy of Beauty”: Ekphrasis in the Works of Acmeists and the European Tradition]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2003, 357 p. (in Russ.)

10. Savkina I. L. Zapiski kak “depersonalizirovannyi dnevnik”: documental’no-khudozhestvennyi potentsial zhanra [Notes as a “Depersonalized Diary”: The Documentary and Artistic Potential of the Genre]. Voprosy literatury [Questions of Literature], 2013, no. 1. (in Russ.) URL: https://voplit.ru/article/zapiski-kak-depersonalizirovannyj-dnevnik-dokumentalnohudozhestvennyj-potentsial-zhanra/ (accessed 16.01.2025).

11. Skripnik A. V. Spetsifika zhanra “Zapisok” v “Zapiskakh sumasshedshego” N. V. Gogolya i “Sil'fide” V. F. Odoevskogo [The Specifics of the “Notes” Genre in N. V. Gogol’s “Diary of a Madman” and V. F. Odoevsky’s “Sylphide”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2008. no. 306, pp. 15–17. (in Russ.)

12. Zakharov V. N. Sistema zhanrov Dostoevskogo (tipologiya i poetika) [The System of Dostoevsky’s Genres (Typology and Poetics)]. Leningrad, LSU Press, 1985, 209 p. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Nazarenko I.I. “Artist’s Notes” as a Form of Literary and Pictorial Self-Reflection in L. Rzhevsky’s Novel “Dina”. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2025;24(9):117-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-9-117-126

Views: 20


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)