Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Family-Tribal Fetishes of the Turks of Hongoray

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-5-154-165

Abstract

Purpose. The author analyses a traditional cult of fetishism, which used to be common in the traditional life of turks of Hongoray (Khakassia) and others nations of Sayan-Altai region. The scientific novelty is in systematizing the materials available belonging to different ethnic groups of the Khakass (the Kachints, Sagai, Kyzyls, Beltyrs). Results. Functional particularities of the Khakass fetishes “tös” described used to protect clan and family health and served as patrons of cattle breeding and hunting. The author discovers many previously unknown signs and describes their ancient roots. Related myths recorded in Khakassia by the author are of great interest. The first research on the famous fetish “tös” of the Khakass was conducted by ethnographer D. A. Klements, who presented special work on these items. He made a description of them according to his personal collections and observations. Now his collection of “tös” is stored in the Minusinsk Museum of Local History. Unfortunately, D. A. Klements did not speak the Khakass language, so many of the item names were not translated properly. In present work, the author describes new functional features of Khakass fetishes “tös”, especially those related to the protection of the health of the family, the patronage of cattle breeding and hunting. Many previously unknown designations have been discovered, and the ancient roots of such representations have been revealed. At present, the cult of fetishism for the Khakas is a thing of the past; therefore, this research seems to be relevant for ethnographic science in terms of ancient myth-making of the population of Hongoray and neighboring regions of southern Siberia. Conclusion. There is evidence of a significant historical depth of the origin of the “tös”. So, as a result of studying anthropomorphic images on the “engraved pebbles” of the Late Bronze Age originating from Khakassia, their certain successive connections with the Hongors’ “tös” were traced. Thus, having a uniform name and functional characteristics, the cult of “tös” to a certain extent characterizes the origin of the popular beliefs of the Hongoray Turks, as well as their evolution in the historical borders of Sayano-Altai and Central Asia.

About the Author

V. Ya. Butanaev
Katanov Khakass State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Адрианов А. В. Айран в жизни Минусинского инородца // Зап. ИРГО. 1909. Т. 34. С. 489-524.

2. Бутанаев В. Я. Бурханизм тюрков Саяно-Алтая. Абакан: Изд-во ХГУ, 2003. 260 с.

3. Бутанаев В. Я., Монгуш Ч. В. Архаические обычаи и обряды саянских тюрков. Абакан: Изд-во ХГУ, 2005. 197 с

4. Вадецкая Э. Б. Древние маски Енисея. Красноярск, СПб.: Версо, 2009. 248 с.

5. Древнетюркский словарь. Л.: Наука, 1969. 676 с.

6. Зеленин Д. К. Культ онгонов в Сибири. Пережитки тотемизма в идеологии сибирских народов. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1936. 340 с.

7. Иванов С. В. Скульптура алтайцев, хакасов и сибирских татар. Л.: Наука, 1979. 196 с.

8. Кенин-Лопсан М. Б. Алгыши тувинских шаманов. Кызыл: Офсет, 1995. 528 с.

9. Клеменц Д. А. Заметка о тюсях // Изв. ВСОИРГО, 1892. Т. 23, № 5-6. С. 22-35.

10. Кузнецова А. А., Кулаков Н. Е. Минусинские и ачинские инородцы (материалы для изучения). Красноярск: Типография Енисейского губернского управления, 1898. 298 с.

11. Кызласов И. Л. Рунические письменности Евразийских степей. М.: Вост. лит., 1994. 327 с.

12. Лаппо Д. Е. Троеверы. Из жизни минусинских инородцев // На сибирские темы. М.: [б. и.], 1905. С. 9-52.

13. Монгольско-русский словарь. М.: Гос. изд-во иностр. и нац. словарей, 1967. 715 с.

14. Образцы народной литературы тюркских племен, изданные В. Радловым. СПб.: [б. и.], 1907. Ч. 9: Наречия урянхайцев (сойотов), абаканских татар и карагасов. 658 с.

15. Савинов Д. Г. Древние поселения Хакасии. Торгажак. СПб.: Петербургское востоковедение, 1996. 112 с.

16. Хакасско-русский словарь. Новосибирск: Наука, 2006. 1112 с.

17. Яковлев Е. К. Этнографический обзор инородческого населения долины Южного Енисея и объяснительный каталог этнографического отдела музея. Минусинск, Типография Корнакова, 1900. 220 с.


Review

For citations:


Butanaev V.Ya. Family-Tribal Fetishes of the Turks of Hongoray. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2019;18(5):154-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-5-154-165

Views: 121


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)