Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

A Collection of Iron Arrowheads from the Museum “Rarity” in Bishkek

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-3-49-57

Abstract

Purpose. The authors considered and analyzed various types of iron arrowheads that are kept as a part of weapon col-lection in the private museum “Rarity” in Bishkek, in the Kyrgyz Republic. We traced primary events related to the history of studying types of iron arrows that were detected at different times by scientists and modern collectors of antiquities on the territory of Tian Shan and Jetysu. Results. The armament objects of long-range combat are classified according to their formal signs. All iron arrow-heads from the collection studied were divided into particular groups and types by characteristic features of their sec-tion and form of feather. On the basis of our formal and typological analysis, we put forward several suggestions about possible functionality of the types of iron arrowheads that we singled out. Some arrowheads were intended for defeat of lightly-armed hostile warriors, whereas other types were created for archery against heavily-armed adver-saries, who were defended by metal or chain armor. Still other arrowheads were universal and could be applied for shelling both warriors non-protected with metal armor and warriors who had those defensive means. Conclusion. Our analysis of iron arrowheads from this collection can be used further for characterizing long-range combat weapon complexes of ancient and medieval warriors of several ethnic groups which resided on the territory of Tian Shan and Jetysu in the boundaries of the Kyrgyz Republic during the Hunnic times and following historical periods of the Early and High Middle Ages.

About the Authors

Y. S. Khudyakov
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation


A. Yu. Borisenko
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation


O. A. Soltobaev
Kyrgyz National University
Russian Federation


References

1. Абрамзон С. М. Этнографический альбом художника П. М. Кошарова (1857 г.) // Сборник музея антропологии и этнографии. 1953. Т. 14. C. 148-167.

2. Акматов К. Т. Железные наконечники стрел кочевников Тянь-Шаня в монгольское время // Вестник НГУ. Серия: История, филология. 2015. Т. 14, № 7: Археология и этнография. С. 193-202.

3. Бернштам А. Н. Историко-археологические очерки центрального Тянь-Шаня и Памиро-Алая // Материалы и исследования по археологии СССР. М., Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1952. № 26. 346 с.

4. Валиханов Ч. Ч. Дневник поездки на Иссык-Куль 1856 г. // Валиханов Ч. Ч. Собр. соч.: В 5 т. Алма-Ата: Гл. ред. Казах. сов. энциклопедии, 1984. Т. 1. C. 306-357.

5. История Киргизской ССР. Фрунзе: Изд-во «Кыргызстан», 1968. Т. 1. 708 c.

6. История Киргизской ССР. С древнейших времен до середины XIX в. Фрунзе: Изд-во «Кыргызстан», 1984. Т. 1. 789 c.

7. Кожомбердиев И. К., Худяков Ю. С. Комплекс вооружения кенкольского воина // Военное дело древнего населения Северной Азии. Новосибирск: Наука, 1987. С. 75-106.

8. Радлов В. В. Из Сибири. Страницы дневника. М.: Наука, 1989. 749 с.

9. Семенов П. П. Путешествие в Тянь-Шань в 1856-1857 годах. М.: Географгиз, 1946. 256 с.

10. Табалдиев К. Ш. Курганы средневековых кочевых племен Тянь-Шаня. Бишкек: Изд-во «Айбек», 1996. 256 с.

11. Табалдиев К., Солтобаев О. Предметы вооружения из погребений центрального Тянь-Шаня (I половина II тысячелетия н. э.) // Военное дело и средневековая археология Централь-ной Азии. Кемерово: Кузбассвузиздат, 1995. С. 108-124.

12. Ташбаева К. И. Культура ранних кочевников Тянь-Шаня и Алая (I тыс. до н. э.). Бишкек: Илим, 2011. 274 с.


Review

For citations:


Khudyakov Y.S., Borisenko A.Yu., Soltobaev O.A. A Collection of Iron Arrowheads from the Museum “Rarity” in Bishkek. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2020;19(3):49-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-3-49-57

Views: 215


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)