Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Buddhist-Taoist Syncretism in the School of the “Twofold Mystery” and the Meditation of “Purity and Quietness”

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-4-91-108

Abstract

The papers are dedicated to the concepts, main ideas, texts, and forms of practice of the syncretic Taoist movement Chongxuan-pai - “Twofold mystery”, which was developed in the 7-10th centuries. This school borrowed a number of logical constructions of Madhyamika Buddhism, including the system of four-level dialectical negation, as well as the idea of absolute “emptying of consciousness” for overcoming attachments both to mundane life and to any mental concepts. In part, these ideas are reflected in the Taoist-Buddhist practice of attaining “purity and quietness, a specific tradition of meditation, with its most important text “Canon of Purity and Quietness” (Qingjing jing) (given in this article in the author’s translation). Despite its traditional structure, thematic allusions with “Dao De Jing” and precepts attributed to Lao-jun, this Canon pays special attention to the technique of “inner contemplation” (nei guan), which also gravitates to the Buddhist practice of vipasyana and is called to eliminate binary opposition (pure-polluted, movementrest) in the practitioner’s consciousness. The “Canon of purity and Quietness” is still highly revered in central China’s Taoist schools today. The basis of the meditative practice according to this Canon is the gradual ascending from “looking inward”, “looking outward” and “looking away” to “contemplation of emptiness”. The highest stage of “emptying the emptiness” leads to the complete deactualization of the ego and the breaking of all ties with the world. In this way, the exegetical idea of the “Twofold mystery” is realized as a form of Taoist practice influenced by Buddhist ideas.

About the Author

A. A. Maslov
Institute of Far Eastern Studies RAS; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation


References

1. Маслов А. А. Трансформативная посвятительная традиция в даосизме и концепция сяня // Вестник НГУ. Серия: История, филология. 2020. Т. 19, № 4: Востоковедение. С. 9-24.

2. Маслов А. А. Эр ди («Две истины») // Китайская философия: Энциклопедический словарь. М.: Мысль, 1994. С. 512-513.

3. Ло Чжуншу. Лунь чэн сюаньинь чуансюэ фанфа [罗中枢。论成玄英的重玄方法 //哲学研究]. О методе двойного сокровенного Чэн Сюаньина // Чжэсюэ яньцзю. 2010. № 9. С. 63-69 (на кит. яз.)

4. Наньхуа чжэньцзин чжушу [南華真經註疏 / 郭象注,成玄英疏,曹礎基等点校]. Истинный канон Южного цветка / С коммент. Го Сяна, Чэн Сюаньина, Цао Чуцзи. Пекин: Чжунхуа шуцзюй, 1998. В 2-х т. 629 с. (на кит. яз.)

5. Чжунго даоцзяо ши [中国道教史 / 卿希泰主编]. История даосизма в Китае: в 4-х т. / Под ред. Цин Ситая. Чэнду: Сычуань жэньминь чубаньшэ, 1996. 2940 с. (на кит. яз.)

6. Чэн Сюаньин. Дао дэ цзин кайти сюйцзюэ ишу [成玄英。道德經開題序訣義疏 // 經子叢書 / 嚴靈峰]. Комментарии, разъясняющие смысл Дао дэ цзина // Цзинцзы цуншу [Коллекция канонов] / Под ред. Янь Линфэна. Тайбэй: Нантянь шуцзюй, 2018. Т. 6. С. 239-728 (на кит. яз.).

7. Шэнь Чжуншу, Цинь Вэйган. Лючао линбаоцзинчжундэ гэ сяньгун [神塚淑、欽偉剛。 六朝靈寶經中的葛仙公 // 宗敎學硏究]. Гэ Сяньгун в канонах Школы Линбао периода Шести династий // Цзунцзяосюэ яньцзю [Изучение религий]. 2007. № 3. С. 1-9; № 4. С. 2-11 (на кит. яз.)

8. Assandri F. The Yijing and Chongxuan Xue: An Onto-Hermeneutic Perspective // Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 2011. Vol. 38, № 3. P. 397-411.

9. Assandri F. Understanding Double Mystery: Daoism in Early Tang as mirrored in the FDLH (T 2104) and Chongxuanxue // Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 2005. Vol. 32, № 3. P. 427-440.

10. Campany R. F. Two Religious Thinkers of the Early Eastern Jin: Gan Bao and Ge Hong in multiple contexts // Asia Major (third series). 2005. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 175-224.

11. Chan A. K. L. A Tale of Two Commentaries: Ho-shang-kung and Wang Pi on the Lao-tzu // Lao-Tzu and the Tao-Te-Ching / ed. by L. Kohn, M. LaFargue. Albany: SANY Press, 1998. P. 89-117.

12. Kohn L. Qingjing jing 清靜經 Scripture of Clarity and Quiescence // The Encyclopedia of Taoism / ed. by F. Pregadio. London and New York: Routledge, 2007. Vol. 2. P. 800-801.

13. Kohn L. Taoist Mystical Philosophy: The Scripture of Western Ascension. Albany: SUNY Press, 1991. 345 p. (SUNY Series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture).

14. Komjathy L. Daoist Texts in Translation (e-book). Published by Center for Daoist Studies, 2004. 56 p.

15. Miura Kunio. Qingjing 清靜 Clarity and Quiescence // The Encyclopedia of Taoism / Ed. by F. Pregadio. London and New York: Routledge, 2007. Vol. 2. P. 799-800.

16. Ozkan Cuma. A comparative analysis: Buddhist Madhyamaka and Daoist Chongxuan (twofold mystery) in the early Tang (618-720). MA (Master of Arts) thesis. University of Iowa, 2013. 63 p. DOI 10.17077/etd.o9rxrm2t

17. Pas J. F., in cooperation with Man Kam Leung. Historical Dictionary of Taoism. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, 1998. xliii, 414 p.

18. Robinson R. H. Some Logical Aspects of Nagarjuna's System // Philosophy East and West, 1957. Vol. 6, № 4. P. 291-308. DOI 10.2307/1397476

19. Sharf R. Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism: a reading of the Treasure Store Treaties. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005. 416 p. (Studies in East Asian Buddhism).

20. Tang Yijie. Cheng Xuanying and the Study of the Twofold Mystery // Taoism / Ed. by Mou Zhongjian, trans. by Pan Junliang, S. Normand. Boston: Brill, 2012. P. 149-175.


Review

For citations:


Maslov A.A. Buddhist-Taoist Syncretism in the School of the “Twofold Mystery” and the Meditation of “Purity and Quietness”. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(4):91-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-4-91-108

Views: 437


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)