Communicative Strategies of an Interviewer Yury Dud: A Linguist’s View of the Media Phenomenon in Mass Culture
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-6-263-277
Abstract
Purpose. The article examines the methods of building dialogue in interviews conducted by the popular video blogger and journalist Yury Dud, who is named the main hero of Russian cultural life in 2020 by Forbes Life. To determine his individual style, the author analyzes strategies of communicative behavior. The following parameters are the most significant for the description of interviewing strategies: thematic repertoire and thematic dominants of the conversation; methods of requesting/extracting information; methods of interpreting and evaluating what the interlocutor said; the choice of language code. The empirical basis of the study contains interviews by Yu. Dud with various interlocutors – journalists, TV presenters, cultural and show business figures, politicians, and other public figures, uploaded on the YouTube video hosting service in the period of 2017–2020. The analysis of more than 40 programs allows observing a wide range of techniques of a journalist, depending on the “addressee factor”.
Results. The key topics that are regularly discussed in interviews are identified, including those that violate ethical taboos (about sex, bad behavior, and bad habits, judgments and hot takes on colleagues and senior officials, etc.). The thematic repertoire is considered as a deliberate communicative choice of a journalist, conditioned by the dramaturgy of public dialogue addressed to a mass audience and the tasks of portrayal.
The author reveals the distinctive methods of requesting information and eliciting facts, which is inherent to the journalistic style of Yu. Dud: illocutionary forcing reasoning (“why-questions”), clarifying questions, reformulating, role modeling of relations with a guest, where the journalist often pretends being dilettante. Interpretation and evaluation of the interlocutor's statements are based on the clearest identification of their position for the mass addressee by an explication of ideas expressed by the guest implicitly, “delegation of opinion”, and the effects of “insight”.
The choice of the language code indicates the “discursive adaptation” of the journalist to his interlocutor and allows the journalist to reveal to the mass audience their personality, including their speech characteristics. The dynamism of the dialogue is due to the setting to dramatize the conversation scenario: this is manifested not only in the choice of somewhat unexpected topics of conversation, but also in the expression of one's attitude to the statements of the interlocutor, explicit/implicit assessments, and the choice of the speech code.
Conclusion. It is concluded that Dud’s interviews are a vivid example of the trends of modern Internet journalism, and the communicative strategies he implements allow us to see the prospects for the development of the genre. Given the popularity of the genre in traditional and new media, the author notices that the interview not only reflects the features of social communications of the 21st century but is also a powerful factor of shaping modern mass culture.
Keywords
References
1. Baranov A. N., Kreydlin G. E. Illokutivnoe vynuzhdenie v strukture dialoga [Illocutionary Constraint in the Structure of the Dialogue]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Issues of Language Studies], 1992, no. 2, p. 84–99. (in Russ.)
2. Broersma M. The Discursive Strategy of a Subversive Genre. The Introduction of the Interview in US and European Journalism. In: Vision in Text and Image. The Cultural Turn in the Study of Arts. M. Kemperink, H. Hoen (eds). Leuven, Paris, Dudley, MA, Peeters, 2008, 214 p.
3. Dorenko S. Nichego ne izmenitsya do 2036 goda. Da i posle [Nothing will change until 2036. Even afterwards]. Sobesednik [Interlocutor]. 2018, № 35 (1721). (in Russ.)
4. Golanova E. I. Ustnyi, publichnyi dialog: zhanr interv'yu [Oral, Public Dialogue: Genre of Interview]. In: Russkii yaazyk kontsa XX stoletiyaa (1985–1995) [Russian Language in the End of the 20th Century (1985–1995)]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul'tury publ., 1996, p. 427–452. (in Russ.)
5. Ilchenko S. N. Interv'yu v zhurnalistike [Interview in Journalism]. Study Guide. Saratov, IPR Media publ., 2019, 282 p. (in Russ.)
6. Issers O. S. Strategiya rechevoi provokatsii v publichnom dialoge [The Strategy of Speech Provocation in the Public Dialogue]. In: Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshhenii [Russian Language in the Scientific Light]. Moscow, Nauka, 2009, iss. 18, p. 92–104. (in Russ.)
7. Issers O. S. Grani “prilichnogo / neprilichnogo” v publichnoi kommunikatsii (na primere interv'yu Yuriya Dudya) [The Verge of Acceptable / Non-acceptable in Public Communication (on the example of Yurii Dud's interviews)]. In: Vezhlivost' i antivezhlivost' v yazyke i kommunikatsii [Politeness and Anti-politeness in the Language and in Communication]. Proc. of International Scientific Conference. Ed. by I. A. Sharonov. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya publ., 2018, p. 94–103. (in Russ.)
8. Issers O. S., Plotnikova O. A. Provotsiruyushchie rechevye taktiki v publichnom interv'yu [Provocative Speech Tactics in a Public Interview]. In: Voprosy kul'tury rechi [Issues of the Culture of Speech]. Ed. by A. D. Shmelev. Moscow, AST PRESS KNIGA publ., 2010, p. 334– 340. (in Russ.)
9. Ivanova I. Zhanr interv'yu: formy bytovaniya i yazykovye osobennosti [Genre of Interview: Forms of Being and Language Features]. Dr. Phil. Sci. Abs. Diss. Astrakhan, 2009, 28 p. (in Russ.)
10. Kaminskaya T. L. “Ritoricheskie utverzhdeniya” v interv'yu [“Rhetoric statements” in Interview]. In: SMI v sovremennom mire [Mass Media in the Contemporary World]. Theses of Scientific and Training Conference. St. Petersburg, Faculty of Journalism in SPbSU Press, 1999, p. 162– 163. (in Russ.)
11. Kantor Yu. Z. Dialogicheskiy tekst interv'yu v kommunikativnom aspekte [Dialogical interview text in communicative aspect]. Dr. Phil. Sci. Abs. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2001, 26 p. (in Russ.)
12. Kolesnichenko A. Prakticheskaya zhurnalistika [Practical Journalism]. Study Guide. Moscow, MSU Press, 2008, 192 p. (in Russ.)
13. Lukina M. M. Tehnologiya interv'yu [The Technology of the Interview]. Study Guide. 2nd ed. Moscow, Aspect Press, 2012, 192 p. (in Russ.)
14. Podosokorskiy N. N. “Litso s ekrana”. V chem sekret populyarnosti tok-shou “vDud'”? [“A Face from the Screen”. Wherein Lies the Secret of the Popularity of the Talk Show “vDud”?]. Nauka televideniya [The Science of TV Broadcast]. 2018, no. 14.3, p. 151–166. (in Russ.)
15. Popova T. I. Teleinterv'yu v kommunikativno-pragmaticheskom aspekte [TV-interview in Communicative and Pragmatic Aspect]. St. Petersburg, Faculty of Philology, SPbSU Press, 2002, 220 p. (in Russ.)
16. Ryurikova S. Poymat' peresmeshnika [To catch a mockingbird]. STORY, 2018, no. 3, p. 54–59. (in Russ.)
17. Sakhnova E. B. Zhanr interv'yu i ego modifikatsii [Genre of Interview and its Modifications] Izvestiya Samarskogo universiteta. Nov. ser. Ser. Filologiya. Zhurnalistika [Samara University Periodical. New Series. Philology Series. Journalism], 2013, vol. 13, iss. 4, p. 98–103. (in Russ.)
18. Shapinskaya E. N. Massovaya kul'tura. Teorii i praktiki [Mass Culture. Theories and Practices: Monograph]. Moscow, Soglasiye publ., 2017, 386 p. (in Russ.)
19. Stepanov V. N. Provokatsionnyi vopros s tochki zreniya pragmalingvistiki [Provocative Question from Pragmalinguistic Point of View]. Moskovskiy lingvisticheskiy zhurnal [Moscow Linguistic Journal], 2003, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 157–180. (in Russ.)
20. Strelnikova M. A. Natsional'naya spetsifika kommunikativnogo povedeniya rossiyskikh i amerikanskikh telezhurnalistov v protsesse interv'yu [The National Peculiarities of Communicative Behavior of Russian and American Tv Journalists in the Interviewing]. In: Lingvistika, lingvodidaktika, lingvokul'turologiya: aktual'nye voprosy i perspektivy razvitiya [Linguistics, Linguodidactics, Linguoculturology: Current Issues and Development Perspectives]. Proc. 2nd International Scientific and Training Conference. Minsk, 2018, p. 251–256. (in Russ.)
21. Swingewood A. The Myth of Mass Culture. Humanities Press, 1977, 146 p.
22. Tsvik V. L. Televizionnaya zhurnalistika [TV Journalism]. Study Guide. 2nd ed. Moscow, YUNITIDANA publ., 2015, 496 p. (in Russ.)
23. Vakhtel N. M., Murtafa K. S. Rechevoe povedenie sovremennogo interv'yuera [Speech Behavior of the Contemporary Interviewer]. In: Professional'naya ritorika: problemy i perspektivy [Professional Rhetorics: Problems and Perspectives]. Voronezh, VSU Press, 2001, p. 69–71. (in Russ.)
24. Vyrovtseva E. V. Diskursivnaya adaptatsiya interv'yuera kak sovremennaya tendentsiya [Interviewer's Discursive Adaptation as a Modern Trend]. In: Media v sovremennom mire [Media in the Contemporary World]. 58th St. Petersburg readings. Proc. of the International Scientific Forum. In 2 vols Ed. by V. V. Vasilyeva. St. Petersburg, SPbSU Press, 2019, p. 171–173. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Issers O.S. Communicative Strategies of an Interviewer Yury Dud: A Linguist’s View of the Media Phenomenon in Mass Culture. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(6):263-277. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-6-263-277