Palace Coups in Russia: Comparative Typologization
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-8-34-48
Abstract
This article considers palace coups as one of the key phenomena of Russian political culture, which intertwined traditions and innovations, accidents and patterns, personal and corporate interests, prudence and adventurism. It analyzes methods and mechanisms by which the Russian autocrats of the late 17th – 18th centuries ascended to the throne. The ways of ascension to the throne were different, but they had one thing in common – compliance with clear rules of succession was very far from ideal, which was significantly different from most European monarchies. In monarchies where inheritance was legally fixed by the principle of primogeniture, it was much more difficult to carry out palace coups. There was no such mandatory legal norm for the Romanov dynasty. Palace coups in Russia did not lead to changes in the social and economic sphere or in the mechanisms of functioning of the state, with the exception of the political careers of individual dignitaries. The last palace revolution in the history of Russia took place in 1801 and symbolically completed the 18th century for it. Most of the changes on the Russian throne during the 18th century took place in the form of a “palace coup” with the participation of representatives of the dynasty and, as a rule, the highest dignitaries. Such methods of changing rulers reflected a certain instability of the supreme power, disputes about the ways of modernizing the country, the consequences of Peter the Great’s reforms and, in fact, intra-dynastic contradictions.
Supporting agencies: The paper was written under the grant PROGRES Q09 “Historie – Klíč k pochopení globalizovaného světa”. Translated from Czech by M. V. Kovalev
About the Author
F. Stellner
Charles University
Czech Republic
Czech Republic
František Stellner, Doctor of History, Professor
WoS K-6463-2015
Prague
References
1. Anisimov J. V. Five Empresses: Court Life in Eighteenth-Century Russia. Westport, Praeger, 2004, 375 p.
2. Anisimov M. Yu. Elizavetinskaya Rossiya i mezhdunarodnye kongressy v seredine XVIII veka [Elizabethan Russia and International Congresses in the Middle of the 18th Century]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya [New and Contemporary History], 2018, no. 1, pp. 121–143. (in Russ.)
3. Bankowicz M. Gosudarstvennyi perevorot, pronuntsiamento, putch: teoreticheskii analiz [Coup d'etat, Pronunciamento, Putsch: A Theoretical Analysis]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya. Sotsiologiya [Proceedings of Voronezh State University Bulletin. Series: History. Political science. Sociology], 2008, no. 2, pp. 3–12. (in Russ.)
4. Bankowicz M. Státní převrat. Prague, Nakladatelství Dokořán, 2010, 118 p. (in Czech) Boetticher M. von (Hrsg.). Braunschweigische Fürsten in Ruβland in der ersten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen, 1998, 329 S.
5. Boltunova E. M. “Ot tebya, s toboyu i k slave tvoei”: Petr II kak Petr I [From You, with You, and to Your Glory: Peter II as Peter I]. Rossiiskaya istoriya [Russian History], 2016, no. 2, pp. 76– 91. (in Russ.)
6. Braun F. H. Morocco: Anatomy of a Palace Revolution That Failed. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 1978, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–72.
7. Clemens D. The “Bavarian Mussolini” and His “Beerhall Putsch”: British Images of Adolf Hitler, 1920–1924. The English Historical Review, 1999, vol. 114, no. 455, pp. 64–84.
8. Dixon S. The Modernization of Russia 1676–1825. Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1999, 267 p.
9. Dragan S. N. “Epokha dvortsovykh perevorotov”: stereotip i real’nost’ [“The Era of Palace Coups”: A Stereotype and Reality]. Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi akademii advokatury i notariata [Scientific Works of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notary], 2016, no. 1, pp. 46–51. (in Russ.)
10. Dragan S. N. Pervyi zakon o prestolonasledii [The First Law on Succession to the Throne]. Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi akademii advokatury i notariata [Scientific Works of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notary], 2017, no. 2, pp. 31–37. (in Russ.)
11. Gvozdenko K. S., Gorsky A. A. O poryadke nasledovaniya knyazheskoi vlasti v Drevnei Rusi [On the Order of Inheritance of Princely Power in Ancient Russia]. Rossiiskaya istoriya [Russian History], 2017, no. 6, p. 14–23. (in Russ.)
12. Hebditch D., Connor K. How to Stage a Military Coup. From Planning to Execution. London, Skyhorse, 2009, 256 p.
13. Hosking G. Russland. Nation und Imperium 1552–1917. Berlin, Siedler, 2000, 574 S.
14. Hughes L. Sophia. Regent of Russia, 1657–1704. New Haven, London, Yale Uni. Press, 1990, 345 p.
15. Iskyul S. N., Berg B. Burkhard Kristof fon Minikh: otsenka, izobrazhenie i issledovanie ego deyatel’nosti v russkoi i nemetskoi istoriografii [Burchard Christoph von Münnich: Assessment, Image and Study of his Activities in Russian and German Historiography]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 2007, no. 10, pp. 172–175. (in Russ.)
16. Kinev S. L. Printsipy nasledovaniya vlasti na Rusi XIV–XVI vv. v otechestvennoi istoriografii [Principles of Inheritance of Power in Russia of the 14th – 16th Centuries in Russian Historiography]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2011, no. 353, pp. 85–92. (in Russ.)
17. Kiselev M. A. “Po pravam vsego sveta”: legitimatsiya dvortsovogo perevorota 1741 g. i problema zakonnosti votsareniya Elizavety Petrovny [“According to the Rights of the Whole World”. Legitimization of the 1741 Palace Coup and the Problem of Elizaveta Petrovna Accession’s Legality]. Rossiya XXI [Russia XXI], 2017, no. 5, pp. 98–117. (in Russ.)
18. Kleinschmidt A. (Hrsg.). Vom Tode Peter’s III bis zum Tode Iwans VI Gesandtschaftsberichte aus dem Haager Reichsarchive. Russische Revue, 1883, Bd. 23, S. 534–559.
19. Klyuchevsky V. O. Russkaya istoriya. Polnyi kurs lektsii [Russian History. The Complete Course of Lectures]. Moscow, OLMA-Press, 2004, 834 p. (in Russ.)
20. Kovalev M. V. Petrovskaya epokha v nauchnom nasledii E. F. Shmurlo [The Petrine Epoch in the Scientific Heritage of E. F. Shmurlo]. In: Novyi vek: istoriya glazami molodykh [The New Century: History through the Eyes of the Young Scholars]. Saratov, 2006, iss. 5, pp. 39–53. (in Russ.)
21. Korshunova N. V. Dvortsovye perevoroty kak instrument utverzhdeniya absolyutnoi monarkhii v Rossii v XVIII – nachale XIX veka [Palace Coups as a Tool for Establishing the Absolute Monarchy in Russia in the 18th – Early 19th Century]. Sotsium i vlast’ [Society and Power], 2017, no. 2, pp. 118–122. (in Russ.)
22. Kurukin I. V. Anna Leopol’dovna [Anna Leopoldovna]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 1997, no. 6, pp. 28–40. (in Russ.)
23. Kurukin I. V. Dvortsovyi perevorot 1741 g.: prichiny, “tekhnologiya”, uroki [The Palace Coup in 1741: Reasons, “Technology”, Lessons]. Otechestvennaya istoriya [Russian History], 1997, no. 5, pp. 3–23. (in Russ.)
24. Kurukin I. V. Anna Leopol’dovna [Anna Leopoldovna]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya, 2012, 302 p. (in Russ.)
25. Kurukin I. V. Anna Ioannovna. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya, 2014, 427 p. (in Russ.)
26. Kurukin I. V. Epokha “dvorskikh bur’”. Ocherki politicheskoi istorii poslepetrovskoi Rossii (1725–1762 gg.) [The Era of “Palace Storms”. Essays on the Political History of Post-Petrine Russia (1725–1762)]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2019, 757 p. (in Russ.)
27. Kurukin I. V., Plotnikov A. B. 19 yanvarya – 25 fevralya 1730 goda: sobytiya, lyudi, dokumenty [January 19 – February 25, 1730: Events, People, Documents]. Moscow, Kvadriga, Ob’edinennaya redaktsiya MVD Rossii, 2010, 275 p. (in Russ.)
28. Kusber J. Katharina II. und ihre Favoriten in den Eliten des russischen Reiches. In: Weibliche Herrschaft im 18. Jahrhundert: Maria Theresia und Katharina die Große. Bielefeld, 2020, S. 147–166.
29. Leontieva O. B. Istoricheskaya pamyat’ i obrazy proshlogo v rossiiskoi kul’ture XIX – nachala XX v. [Historical Memory and Images of the Past in the Russian Culture of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. Samara, Kniga Publ., 2011, 448 p. (in Russ.)
30. Liechtenhan F.-D. Rossiya vkhodit v Evropu: imperatritsa Elizaveta Petrovna i voina za Avstriiskoe nasledstvo, 1740–1750 [Russia Enters Europe: Empress Elizaveta Petrovna and the War of the Austrian Succession, 1740–1750]. Moscow, OGI, 2000, 412 p. (in Russ.)
31. Liechtenhan F.-D. Elizaveta Petrovna: imperatritsa, nepokhozhaya na drugikh [Elizaveta Petrovna: Empress, unlike the Others]. Moscow, Astrel’, 2012, 635 p. (in Russ.)
32. Luttwak E. Gosudarstvennyi perevorot. Prakticheskoe posobie [A Coup d’etat. Practical Guide]. Moscow, Rossiiskii fond sodeistviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, 2012, 326 p. (in Russ.)
33. Lystsova A. S. Rol’ grafa A. I. Ostermana v regulirovanii prestolonaslediya v Rossii v 1730-e – nachale 1740-kh gg. [The Role of Count A. I. Osterman in the Regulation of the Succession to the Throne in Russia in the 1730s – Early 1740s]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University], 2017, no. 2, pp. 150–161. (in Russ.)
34. Massie R. K. Peter der Grosse. Sein Leben und seine Zeit. Frankfurt am Main, Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag, 1987, 791 S.
35. Melnikov S. A. Nasledovanie prestola na Rusi i institut sopravitel’stva kak faktory tsentralizatsii [Succession to the Throne in Russia and the Institution of Co-government as Factors of Centralization]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 2001, no. 11–12, pp. 102–108. (in Russ.)
36. Pavlenko N. I. Petr II [Peter II]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya, 2006, 281 p. (in Russ.)
37. Pavlova E. V. Perevorot 1801 goda i russkoe obshchestvo (vopros o preemstvennosti i legitimnosti samoderzhavnoi vlasti) [The Coup of 1801 and Russian Society (the Question of the Succession and Legitimacy of the Autocratic Power)]. Cand. Hist. Sci. Diss. Samara, 2008, 266 p. (in Russ.)
38. Petrukhintsev N. N. Dvortsovye inrtigi 1730-kh godov i “delo” A. P. Volynskogo [Palace Intrigues of the 1730s and the “Case” of A. P. Volynsky]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 2006, no. 4, pp. 30–37. (in Russ.)
39. Plotnikov A. B. Ogranichenie samoderzhaviya v Rossii v 1730 g.: idei o formy [Restriction of Autocracy in Russia in 1730: Ideas and Forms]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 2001, no. 1, pp. 60–69. (in Russ.)
40. Plotnikova O. A. Poryadok nasledovaniya vlasti v Drevnerusskom gosudarstve [The Order of Succession of Power in the Old Russian State]. Vlast’ [Power], 2007, no. 10, pp. 107–110. (in Russ.)
41. Powell J. Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d’état. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2012, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1017–1040.
42. Schippan M. Mächtepolitik und Aufklärung an Spree und Newa. Deutsch-russische Begegnungenim Zeitalter der Aufklärung (18. Jahrhundert). In: Wanderausstellung durch Deutschland und Russland. Dokumentation. Göttingen, Köln, 1997, S. 195–216.
43. Shmurlo E. F. Padenie tsarevny Sof’i [The Fall of Princess Sophya]. Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya [Journal of the Ministry of National Education], 1896, no. 1, pp. 38–95. (in Russ.)
44. Sorokin Yu. A. Zagovor i tsateubiistvo 11 marta 1801 goda [Conspiracy and Regicide on March 11, 1801]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 2006, no. 4, pp. 15–29. (in Russ.)
45. Stellner F. Dinasticheskaya politika Avstriiskoi, Prusskoi i Rossiiskoi monarkhii v XVIII veke: sravnitel’no-istoricheskii analiz [The Dynastic Policy of the Austrian, Prussian and Russian Monarchies in the 18th Century: A Comparative Historical Analysis]. Rossiya XXI [Russia XXI], 2012, no. 4, pp. 82–109. (in Russ.)
46. Stellner F. Die Interessengruppen am Hof Elisabeth Petrownas. Ein Beitrag zur Analyse der Herrscherstellung im absolutistischen System. Politische Kommunikation zwischen Imperien: Der diplomatische Aktionsraum Südost- und Osteuropa (Innsbrucker Historische Studien). Innsbruck, Wien, Bolzen, 2013, S. 145–154.
47. Stellner F. Dinasticheskii aspekt vneshnei politiki Petra III [The Dynastic Aspect of Peter III’s Foreign Policy]. Rossiiskaya istoriya [Russian History], 2014, no. 4, pp. 70–79. (in Russ.)
48. Švankmajer M. et al. Dějiny Ruska. Prague, Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, 1995, 474 p. (in Czech)
49. Teibenbacher E. Catherine the Great: How the Question of Legitimacy Influenced her Politics. In: Dynastic Change: Legitimacy and Gender in Medieval and Early Modern Monarchy. London, New York, 2019, pp. 255–274.
50. Troitsky N. A. Aleksandr I i Napoleon [Alexander I and Napoleon]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1994, 304 p. (in Russ.)
51. Troitsky S. M. Istoriografiya “dvortsovykh perevorotov” v Rossii XVIII v. [Historiography of “Palace Coups” in Russia of the 18th Century]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 1966, no. 2, pp. 38–53. (in Russ.)
52. Volkova I. V., Kurukin I. V. Fenomen dvortsovykh perevorotov v politicheskoi istorii Rossii XVIII–XX vv. [The Phenomenon of Palace Coups in the Political History of Russia 18th – 20th Centuries]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History], 1995, no. 5–6, pp. 40–61. (in Russ.)
53. Weyr F. Pojem puče. Filosofický časopis, 1995, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 449–460. (in Czech) Wortman R. Russian Monarchy: Representation and Rule. Collected Articles. Boston, Academic Studies Press, 2013, 332 p.
54. Zald M. N., Berger M. A. Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d’État, Insurgency, and Mass Movements. American Journal of Sociology, 1978, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 823–861.
55. Zyzykin M. V. Tsarskaya vlast’ i zakon o prestolonasledii v Rossii [Tsarist Power and the Law on Succession to the Throne in Russia]. Sofia, A. A. Liven Publ., 1924, 194 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Stellner F. Palace Coups in Russia: Comparative Typologization. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(8):34-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-8-34-48
Views:
887
Email this article 