“Find Your Own and Feel Comfortable…”: Communicative Space of Russian Officials of the Resettlement Administration as a Factor of Professional Adaptation (Late 19th – Early 20th Century)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-8-61-72
Abstract
Based on the published memoirs of the employees of the Migration Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the article reconstructs the communicative space of the Russian bureaucracy, which was responsible for organizing population migrations to the eastern outskirts of the empire in the late 19th – early 20th centuries. The research identifies the actors, conditions and channels of communicative actions of managers, who belong to the formed in the post-reform period generation and performed their duties under the influence of socio-cultural transformations of the second half of the 19th century. It has been proved that the main features of the identity of the new type of imperial bureaucracy were: breadth of views and a democratic style of behavior within a professional group, a sense of responsibility towards society and the state, a categorical rejection of radical political ideas and ways of their manifestation. The research demonstrates that the cultural and historical background of organizing the communicative space of resettlement officials was a qualitative rethinking of the tasks of the “resettlement case”, which became an important element of the colonial policy in the eastern parts of the country. The concernes of the authorities on the agrarian issue gave the resettlement movement a priority status in the domestic policy of Russia. In this aspect, the significance of the bureaucracy that was involved in solving problems related to the organization and regulation of the resettlement process has also changed. The article establishes that, in contrast to the bulk of Russian officials, the employees of the resettlement department were characterized by greater mobility and intensity of contacts with various class categories of the empire’s population, primarily with the peasantry. It was the communication with the peasantry that named the considered category of officials “resettelers”, which eventually determined their identity as specific, different from the identity of other groups of the Russian bureaucracy. Thus, within the space of official and informal interaction of resettlement officials, the principles of paternalism and partnership underlied the communicative action, which contributed to the “soft” professional adaptation of young employees of the department, the collective adoption of conventions of mutual understanding, cooperation and maintenance of comfortable conditions for activity. All this, taken together, increased the efficiency of the work of the empire's representatives on the colonized territories, and raised the prestige of the Russian state in the Trans-Ural regions.
About the Author
M. K. ChurkinRussian Federation
Mikhail K. Churkin, Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor
Scopus 57188640644
WoS AAQ-8591-2021
Omsk
Tobolsk
References
1. Bogdanov V. P. “Krapivennoe semya”: chinovnichestvo i rossiiskaya samorefleksiya [“Nettle seed”: Bureaucracy and Russian Self-Reflection]. Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with Time], 2011, iss. 37, pp. 101–125. (in Russ.)
2. Frolova T. A. Sotsiokul’turnyi oblik chinovnichestva Zapadnoi Sibiri v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. [The Socio-Cultural Image of the Officials in Western Siberia in the Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. Abstract of Cand. Hist. Sci. Diss. Omsk, 2006, 25 p. (in Russ.)
3. Habermas J. Moral’noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deistvie [Moral Awareness and Communicative Action]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2000, 377 p. (in Russ.)
4. Ivanov V. A. Gubernskoe chinovnichestvo 50–60-kh gg. XIX v. v Rossii: Istoriko-istochnikovedcheskie ocherki [Provincial Bureaucracy of the 1850s–1860s in Russia: Historical and Source Studies]. Kaluga, KSPI Press, 1994, 229 p. (in Russ.)
5. Kondakov I. V. Vvedenie v istoriyu russkoi kul’tury [Introduction to the History of Russian Culture]. A Textbook for Universities. Moscow, Aspect-Press, 1997, 686 p. (in Russ.)
6. Matkhanova N. P. General-gubernatory Vostochnoi Sibiri serediny XIX v.: V. Ya. Rupert, N. N. Muravyev-Amursky, M. S. Korsakov [Governor-Generals of Eastern Siberia in the middle of the 19th Century: V. Ya. Rupert, N. N. Muravyev-Amursky, M. S. Korsakov]. Novosibirsk, SB RAS Publ., 1998, 422 р. (in Russ.)
7. Moryakova O. V. Provintsial’noe chinovnichestvo v Rossii vtoroi chetverti XIX veka: sotsial’nyi portret, byt i nravy [Provincial Bureaucracy in Russia in the 2nd Quarter of the 19th Century: A Social Portrait, Everyday Life and Customs]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya: Istoriya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Series: History], 1993, no. 6, pp. 11–23. (in Russ.)
8. Rodigina N. N. Pereselencheskie chinovniki o krest’yanskikh migratsiyakh v Sibir’ vo vtoroi polovine XIX v. [Resettlement Officials on Peasant Migrations to Siberia in the 2nd Half of the 19th Century]. In: Zhit’ zakonom: pravovoe i pravovedcheskoe prostranstvo istorii [To Live by the Law: Legal and Jurisprudential Space of History]. Novosibirsk, 2003, pp. 88–104. (in Russ.)
9. Rozanov V. V. Apokalipsis nashego vremeni [Apocalypse of Our Time]. Moscow, Respublika, 2000, 429 p. (in Russ.)
10. Suvorova N. G. Lichnye dela imperskikh i sovetskikh kolonizatsionnykh ekspertov (konets XIX – pervaya tret’ XX v.): informatsionnye vozmozhnosti [Personal Files of Imperial and Soviet Colonization Experts (late 19th – 1st Third of the 20th Century): Informational Opportunities]. In: Omskie nauchnye chteniya [Omsk Scientific Readings]. All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference Papers. Omsk, 2017, pp. 205–208. (in Russ.)
11. Tennis F. Obshchnost’ i obshchestvo [Community and Society]. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’, 2002, 452 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Churkin M.K. “Find Your Own and Feel Comfortable…”: Communicative Space of Russian Officials of the Resettlement Administration as a Factor of Professional Adaptation (Late 19th – Early 20th Century). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(8):61-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-8-61-72






































