Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Argument Distinctive Context Functioning of 被 bei (Based on the Material of the Late Classical Chinese Text – “Lunheng”).

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-4-114-127

Abstract

The paper deals with some features of Late Classical Chinese based on material from «Lunheng» (1st century AD), specifically, the process of 被 bèi grammaticalization and its possibility to be a distinctive context for noun lexemes. In modern Chinese, 被 bèi is a passive marker in sentences such as O 被 bèi SV. There is also a short form like O 被 bèi V, which is the initial stage in the formation of a passive construction, while the full form appears in late medieval texts. However, it is necessary to understand when exactly the process of grammaticalization of 被 bèi began, and whether this process affected the language of Late Classical Chinese. The main questions this paper addresses are: (1) when did the process of 被 bèi grammaticalization begin; (2) is 被 bèi still a verb in the Late Classical Chinese language and can we syntactically distinguish an argument of a clause in the context of 被 bèi. Not only are verb functions of 被 bèi (which can be found in 5th century BC texts) analyzed, but also supposedly its original nominal functions in earlier texts. The study shows that the passive-like 被 bèi begins to appear even in BC texts, but the verbal lexeme functions remain a major. It can be assumed that in Late Classical Chinese, particularly in the language of the «Lunheng» text, the lexeme 被 bèi doesn’t have passive marker qualities and 被 bèi can and should be analyzed from the point of view of lexical categories, as a transitive verb specifically. Such conclusions make it possible to analyze 被 bèi in an argument distinctive context, that is, the position of 被 bèi in a sentence next to any lexeme can help to identify the syntactic function of this lexeme within the specified context. This means it is possible to determine the position of the argument of any clause, which can later be used for PoS parsing of Late Classical Chinese texts.

About the Author

A. D. Durymanova
Russian State University for the Humanities; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation
Anastasia D. Durymanova, Researcher, LecturerMoscow


References

1. Benedict P.K. A Sino-Tibetan. A conspectus. Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1972, 230 p.

2. Branner D. On Early Chinese Morphology and its Intellectual History. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society for 2003, 2005, vol. 22, pp. 1–45.

3. Dryer M. In Defense of a Universal Passive. Linguistic Analysis, 1982, vol. 10, pp. 53–60.

4. Durymanova A. D. Nouns and verbs' syntactic shift: some evidences against Old Chinese parts-of-speech system's flexibility (analysis of Lunheng I AD). In: 34th Paris Meeting on East Asian Linguistics. CRLAO, 2021, p. 22.

5. Durymanova A. D. Predikativnye funkcii sushchestvitel'nyh s predmetnym znacheniem v yazyke pamyatnikov drevnekitajskogo perioda [Predicative function of nominal lexemes in Ancient Chinese]. In: Problemy yazyka. Conference proceedings. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kancler, 2019, pp. 90–103. (in Russ.)

6. Durymanova A. D. Protivopostavlenie imen i glagolov v drevnekitajskom pamjatnike Lunheng I v. n. e. [Nouns and Verbs’ opposition in Lunheng I AD]. Thesis synopsis. … PhD. Russian State Uni. for the Humanities, 2021, 63 p. (in Russ.)

7. Gianninoto M. Western grammars of the Chinese language in the 18th and 19th centuries. In: ICHOLS XII. St. Petersburg, 2011, pp. 53–61.

8. Hashimoto M. The structure and typology of the Chinese passive construction. Amsterdam, John Benjamins publishing company, 1988, 329 p.

9. Haspelmath M. The Grammaticization of Passive Morphology. Studies in Language, 1990, vol. 14 (1), pp. 25–74.

10. Karlgren B. New excursions in Chinese Grammar. BMFEA, 1952, no. 24, pp. 51–80.

11. Kryukov M. V., Huan Shuin. Drevnekitajskij yazyk [Ancient Chinese]. Moscow, Main editorial office for oriental literature, 1978, 497 p. (in Russ.)

12. Nikitina T. N. Grammatika drevnekitajskih tekstov [Grammar of Ancient Chinese texts]. Leningrad, Leningrad university, 1982, 148 p. (in Russ.)

13. Sun Ch. Word-order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford, Stanford Uni. Press, 1996, 224 p.

14. Sun L. Flexibility in the Parts-of-Speech System of Classical Chinese. Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton, 2020, 334 p.

15. Wang Li. Wang Li wenji [ 王力。王力文集]. Collected works of Wang Li. Vol. 11. Jinan, Shandong chubanshe, 1990, 848 p. (in Chin.)

16. Xiandai hanyu da cidian [现代汉语大词典]. Modern Chinese dictionary. Beijing, Shangwu yinshu guan, 2016, 1800 p.

17. Yahontov S. E. Drevnekitajskij yazyk [Ancient Chinese]. Moscow, Nauka, 1965, 105 p. (in Russ.)

18. Zádrapa L. Word-Class Flexibility in Classical Chinese. Leiden, Brill Academic Publishers, 2011, 256 p.


Review

For citations:


Durymanova A.D. Argument Distinctive Context Functioning of 被 bei (Based on the Material of the Late Classical Chinese Text – “Lunheng”). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2022;21(4):114-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-4-114-127

Views: 217


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)