Artificial Intelligence: A Humanitarian Perspective
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-6-20-29
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the features of human intelligence and the intelligence of complex computer systems, usually referred to as artificial intelligence (AI). As a hypothesis, a statement was formulated about a significant difference between human and artificial intelligence. Human intelligence is a product of a multi-thousand-year history of the development and interaction of three interrelated processes: 1) the formation and development of the human personality; 2) the formation of complex network relationships between members of the social community; 3) collective activity as the basis for the existence and development of communities and individuals. AI is a complex of technological solutions that imitate human cognitive processes. Because of this, with all the options for technical development (acceleration of processes for collecting and processing data and finding solutions, using computer vision, speech recognition and synthesis, etc.). AI will always be associated with human activity. In other words, only people (not machines) are the ultimate source and determinant of values on which any artificial intelligence depends. No mind (human or machine) will ever be truly autonomous: everything we do depends on the social context created by other people who determine the meaning of what we want to achieve. This means that people are responsible for everything that AI does.
About the Author
I. M. Dzyaloshinsky
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Iosif M. Dzyaloshinsky, Doctor of Sciences (Philology)
Moscow
References
1. Anokhin K. V. Kognitom: v poiskakh fundamental'noi neironauchnoi teorii soznaniya [Cognitome: In Search of a Fundamental Neuroscience Theory of Consciousness]. Zhurnal vysshei nervnoi deyatel'nosti im. I. P. Pavlova [I. P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous Activity]. 2021, vol. 71, no. 1, p. 39–71. (in Russ.)
2. Berdyaev N. A. Chelovek i mashina (problema sotsiologii i metafiziki tekhniki) [Man and Machine (The Problem of Sociology and Metaphysics of Technology)]. Put’ [Way], 1933, no. 38, pp. 3–38. (in Russ.)
3. Cicero. Filosofskie traktaty [Philosophical Works]. Moscow, Nauka, 1985, 382 p. (in Russ.)
4. Drikker A. S., Makovetsky E. A. Formirovanie sovremenny informatsionnykh idealov [Formation of Modern Information Ideals]. Kul'tura i tekhnologii [Culture and Technology], 2016, vol. 1, pp. 32–40. (in Russ.) DOI 10.17586/2587-800X-2016-1-1-32-40
5. Dzyaloshinsky I. M. Filosofiya tsifrovoi tsivilizatsii i transformatsiya mediakommunikatsii [Philosophy of Digital Civilization and Transformation of Media Communications]. Chelyabinsk, YuUrSU Press, 2020, 551 p. (in Russ.)
6. Dzyaloshinsky I. M., Lobodenko L. K., Pilgun M. A. Sotsial'nye soobshchestva i kommunika tsionnye servisy v epokhu tsifrovoi tsivilizatsii [Social Communities and Communication Services in the Era of Digital Civilization]. Chelyabinsk, YuUrSU Press, 2020, 746 p. (in Russ.)
7. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody [Escape from Freedom]. Moscow, AST, 2021, 288 p. (in Russ.)
8. Granovetter M. Economic action, social structure, and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, no. 91, pp. 481–510.
9. Greve H. Jumping ship: the diffusion of strategy abandonment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, no. 40, pp. 444–473.
10. Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2016, 208 p. (in Russ.)
11. Strang D. Diffusion in Organisations and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 1998, vol. 24, nо. 1, pp. 265–290.
12. Ziegler R. Market structure and cooperation. München, 1982.
Review
For citations:
Dzyaloshinsky I.M. Artificial Intelligence: A Humanitarian Perspective. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2022;21(6):20-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-6-20-29
Views:
529
Email this article 