Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

The Alternative Question in YouTube-Interview: Linguistic, Pragmatic and Cognitive Aspects

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-6-79-88

Abstract

Within the framework of the culture of questioning we have explored alternative questions that occupy an intermediate position between the well-known open and closed questions. In terms of language, this is a situational or contextually incomplete sentence. Based on the regular incomplete implementation of the language model, we can speak about the formation of an independent interrogative syntactic structure “N1 or N1?”, in which the idea of choice is realized through grammatical rather than lexical means. In this case, the semantics of the construction actualizes the meaning of the disjunctive conjunction or. In terms of media communication, it is important that this type of question is widely used in interviews on the popular video hosting platform YouTube (in particular, on the channels “Wdud” (recognized as a foreign agent), “Caution: Sobchak”, “Tell Gordeeva”, RTVI: “Special Guest”). The alternative question is the element of play, agonality, competition. It is usually included in a series of short questions of the “Blitz” section and allows the interviewer to realize different intentions: to update important topics of the conversation or to touch on new areas. In this case, a binary opposition is created based on contextual homonymy, which allows assessment according to the principle: “friend or foe”. Various scenarios of the interviewee's speech behavior have been identified. The cooperation strategy is implemented in different versions of the answer to an alternative question; the strategy of confrontation is the refusal to answer (direct or indirect). Alternative questions emphasize the binary nature of thinking, embody the strategy of polarization.

About the Author

I. V. Vysotskaya
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Irina V. Vysotskaya, Doctor of Sciences (Philology)

Novosibirsk



References

1. Amirov V. M., Mamedova S. Ya. Interv’yu: ot klassicheskogo zhanra k sovremennym formatam (na primere programm “Vdud'” i “A pogovorit'?”) [Interviews: from the classic genre to modern formats (using the example of the programs “Wdud” and “How to talk?”)]. Izvestiya Ural'- skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury [News of the Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1: Problems of education, science and culture], 2021, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 30–37. (in Russ.)

2. Babaytseva V. V. Yavleniya perekhodnosti v grammatike russkogo yazyka [Phenomena of Transitivity in the Grammar of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Drofa, 2000, 640 p. (in Russ.)

3. Babaytseva V. V. Sintaksis russkogo yazyka [Syntax of the Russian Language]. Moscow, FLINTA; Nauka, 2015, 576 p. (in Russ.)

4. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoi germenevtiki [Truth and Method. Fundamentals of Philosophical Hermeneutics]. Moscow, 1988, 704 p. (in Russ.)

5. Ilyenko S. G. Ob odnom iz sintaksicheskikh paradoksov: kommunikativnoe prevoskhodstvo ne polnogo predlozheniya kak sledstvie ego strukturnoi ushcherbnosti [On One of the Syntactic Paradoxes: The Communicative Superiority of an Incomplete Sentence as a Consequence of Its Structural Inferiority]. In: Rusistics: Selected works. St. Petersburg: A. I. Herzen of Russian State Pedagogical Uni. Press, 2003, pp. 47–56. (in Russ.)

6. Issers O. S. Communicative Strategies of an Interviewer Yury Dud: A Linguist’s View of the Media Phenomenon in Mass Culture. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2021, vol. 20, no. 6: Journalism, p. 263–277. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-6-263-277

7. Lukina M. M. Tekhnologiya interv'yu [Interview Technology]. Textbook for Universities. Mos-cow, Aspect Press, 2003, 188 p. (in Russ.)

8. Maksimova N. V. Answering question in communicative culture. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2018, vol. 17, no. 6: Journalism, pp. 108–115. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-6-108-115

9. Shvedova N. Yu. (ch. ed.). Russkaya grammatika [Russian Grammar]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, vol. 2: Syntax, 709 p. (in Russ.)

10. Tyupa V. I. Literatura i mental'nost' [Literature and Mentality]. Moscow, Yurayt, 2020, 231 p. (in Russ.)

11. Yablonovskaya N. V., Ezyk A. V., Mustafaeva N. D. Zhanr interv'yu na platforme russko yazychnogo segmenta YouTube: transformatsii i mediatekhnologii [The Genre of Interview on the Platform of the Russian Language Segment of YouTube: Transformation and Media- technology]. Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Filologicheskiye nauki [Scientific Notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Philological Sciences], 2020, vol. 6 (72), no. 4, pp. 225–238. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Vysotskaya I.V. The Alternative Question in YouTube-Interview: Linguistic, Pragmatic and Cognitive Aspects. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2022;21(6):79-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-6-79-88

Views: 296


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)