Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Historical Studies of the Opponents of Church Reform in the 17th – the 1st Quarter of the 18th Century

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-8-34-43

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of the formation of a historical scheme created by the Old Believers, to include the socio-religious movement in global Christian history. It shows that the monks of the Solovetsky Monastery reproduced the stratagem proposed by the scholars of Ancient Russia for incorporating of Russian history into the world history, accompanying it with the perception of events from an eschatological perspective. At the same time, they put an accent on the events that, in their opinion, led to the crisis of the Russian society. The next generations of opponents of the ecclesiastical reforms tried to improve this scheme, adapted it due to the changing conditions. By the end of the 17th century, internal church opposition began to turn into a broad religious and social movement, which divided into two groups – accepting priests and not accepting (“bespopovcy”), and each of them – into independent communities. The process of improving the historical scheme proposed by the Solovetsky monks manifested itself especially clearly in the works written in the center of the Pomor association of the Vyg community. Based on the results of the analysis of the Vyg historical narrative the article concludes that the Old Believers considered Russia failed as a stronghold of the true faith due to the actions of the reformers. They assumed the defeat of the monks from Solovetsky monastery, who advocated the preservation of the traditions of the Russian Church, as sign of the coming of the kingdom of the Antichrist. In this situation, the proclamation of Vyg as the successor of the Solovetsky Monastery meant that the Vyg Old Believers community inherited the function of preserving the true faith. The eschatological perception of reality, typical for the Old Believers, determined their view, that only the existence of the community was a guarantee of the continuation of the history of mankind. Such interpretation of history gave the members of Vyg community confidence in their own significance and a sense of responsibility for the fate to the world.

About the Author

N. S. Gurianova
Institute of History of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Natalia S. Gurianova, Doctor of Sciences (History)
Scopus Author ID 57222243564

Novosibirsk



References

1. Bubnov N. Yu. Pamyatniki staroobryadcheskoi pis’mennosti: Sochineniya Gerontiya Solovetskogo. Istoriya o patriarkhe Nikone [Pieces of the Old Believers’ Literature: Works by Geronty of Solovetsky. History of Patriarch Nikon]. St. Petersburg, Russkaya simfoniya, 2006, 320 p. (in Russ.)

2. Chumicheva O. V. “Otvet vkrattse Solovetskogo monastyrya” i Pyataya solovetskaya chelobitnaya (vzaimootnoshenie tekstov) [“The Answer in Brief of the Solovetsky Monastery” and the Fifth

3. Solovetsky Petition (Intertextual Relations)]. In: Issledovaniya po istorii literatury i obshchestvennogo soznaniya feodal’noi Rossii [Studies in History of Literature and Public Consciousness of the Feudal Russia]. Novosibirsk, 1992, pp. 59–69. (in Russ.)

4. Chumicheva O. V. Solovetskoe vosstanie 1667–1676 gg. [The Solovetsky Monastery Uprising of 1667–1676]. 2nd ed. Moscow, OGI, 2009, 352 p. (in Russ.)

5. Druzhinin V. G. Slovesnye nauki v Vygovskoi pomorskoi pustyni [Philological Studies in the Vyg Pomor Pustyn]. St. Petersburg, Tipografiya M. A. Aleksandrova, 1911, 32 p. (in Russ.)

6. Gurianova N. S., Crummey R. O. Istoricheskaya skhema v sochineniyakh pisatelei Vygovskoi literaturnoi shkoly [Historical Scheme in the Writings of the Authors of the Vyg Literary School]. In: Staroobryadchestvo v Rossii (XVII–XVIII vv.). [Old Belief in Russia (17th – 18th Centuries)]. Moscow, 1994, pp. 120–138. (in Russ.)

7. Kagan M. D. Geronty. In: Slovar’ knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevnei Rusi [Dictionary of the Ancient Russian Bookish Scholars and Bookishness]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin, 1992, iss. 3 (17th century), pt. 1, pp. 200–203. (in Russ.)

8. Kozlov V. P. Tainy fal’sifikatsii [Secrets of Falsification]. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1996, 272 p. (in Russ.)

9. Sapozhnikova O. S. Russkii knizhnik XVII v. Sergii Shelonin. Redaktorskaya deyatel’nost’ [Russian Bookish Scholars of the 17th Century. Sergius Shelonin. Editorial Activity]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Al’yans-Arkheо, 2010, 560 p. (in Russ.)

10. Sinitsyna N. V. Tretii Rim. Istoki i evolyutsiya russkoi srednevekovoi kontseptsii (XV–XVI vv.) [The Third Rome. Origins and Evolution of the Russian Medieval Concept (15th – 16th Centuries)]. Moscow, Indrik, 1998, 416 p. (in Russ.)

11. Yukhimenko E. M. Vygovskaya staroobryadcheskaya pustyn’: Dukhovnaya zhizn’ i literature [Vyg Old Believers Pustyn: Spiritual Life and Literature.]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2002, vol. 1, 544 p.; vol. 2, 480 p. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Gurianova N.S. Historical Studies of the Opponents of Church Reform in the 17th – the 1st Quarter of the 18th Century. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2022;21(8):34-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-8-34-43

Views: 199


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)