Features of Parenthetical Constructions in Mo Yan’s Novel “Tired of Being Born and Dying” (2005)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-4-115-126
Abstract
This article is devoted to the study of parenthetical constructions and structures in the Chinese language of fiction, based on the material of the novel “Tired of being Born and Dying” by Mo Yan (《生死疲劳》莫言,2005) as a problem of modern semantic-syntactic and functional-stylistic phenomena, which, representing localized fragments of speech as part of the main utterance, emphasize the nonlinearity of linguistic thinking and act as an artistic means of expression. Hence, the purpose of this work is to determine and systematize the features of the use of such plug-in constructions in artistic discourse on the selected material, to fix the beginning of the use of such a language practice not typical for Chinese literary texts previously. In the syntax of the Chinese literary language, such pragmatic inserts, or so-called parenthetics, were completely absent until the last quarter of the 20th century, because they were not a normative and characteristic means of Chinese grammar. Its active implementation in artistic discourse can be attributed only to the turn of the 20th – 21st centuries and the first quarter of the 21st century. Syntactically parenthetical constructions function at the system (combinatorics of components), pictorial (stylistic labeling) and compositional (organization of text space) levels. Based on the factual material, it has been proven that the use of parenthetical constructions practice is one of the features of Mo Yan’s idiostyle, integrating different narrative plans. The paper also systematizes the main functions of plug-in structures. The results of the study provide a basis for further research of parenthetical constructions in Chinese prose.
About the Author
A. IgnatenkoRussian Federation
Alexander V. Ignatenko, Candidate of Science (Philology), Associate Professor
Scopus Author ID 57223025263
WoS Researcher ID ABC-7865-2020
RSCI Author ID 1045741
Moscow
References
1. Aleksandrova O. V. Problemy ekspressivnogo sintaksisa [Problems of expressive syntax]. Moscow, Lenand, 2021, 214 p. (in Russ.)
2. Andramonova N. A. Semantiko-funktsional'nyi status parentezy (na materiale proizvedenii L. N. Tolstogo) [Semantic and functional status of parenthesis (based on the works of L. N. Tol- stoy)]. Filologiya i kul'tura [Philology and Culture], 2014, no. 1 (35), pp. 7–12. (in Russ.)
3. Birenbaum Ya. G. Prostranstvo vvodnosti i pridatochnye predlozheniya [The introductory space and subordinate clauses]. Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical Uni. Press, 1976, 117 p. (in Russ.)
4. Gorbacheva E. N. Vvodnye vyskazyvaniya v strukture teksta [Introductory statements in the structure of the text]. Moscow, Moscow State Pedagogical Uni. Press, 2003, 154 p. (in Russ.)
5. Dolgova O. V. Semiotika neplavnoi rechi [Semiotics of non-verbal speech]. Moscow, Higher School, 1978, 264 p. (in Russ.)
6. Ignatenko A. V. Osobennosti yazykovoi igry v proze Lyu Chzhen'yunya na primere romana “Ya ne Pan' Czin'lyan'” [Features of the language game in Liu Zhenyun's prose on the example of the novel “I am not Pan Jinlian”]. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University. Series: Oriental and African Studies, 2022, no. 3, pp. 507–523. (in Russ.) DOI 10.21638/spbu13.2022.308
7. Peskova N. A. Kognitivnaya osnova izomorfizma nekotorykh sintaksicheskikh konstruktsii [Cognitive basis of isomorphism of some syntactic constructions]. In: Cognitive paradigm: frame semantics and nomination. Pyatigorsk, Pyatigorsk State Uni. Press, 2002, pp. 133–139. (in Russ.)
8. Polikarpova O. N. Kommentativnaya parenteza kak edinitsa kompozitsionnogo sintaksisa: na m- ateriale angliiskogo yazyka [Commentative paranthesis as a unit of compositional syntax: on the material of the English language]. Barnaul, Altai State Pedagogical Uni. Press, 2011, 193 p. (in Russ.)
9. Polikarpova O. N. Kriterii razgranicheniya kommmentativnoi modusnoi parentezy i similyativ- nykh sintaksicheskikh preobrazovanii [Criteria for distinguishing the commentative mode parenthesis and the similative syntactic transformations]. The World of Science, Culture and Education, 2017, no. 2 (63), pp. 367–369. (in Russ.)
10. Rachuk N. V. Funktsionirovanie vvodnykh elementov v sovremennom gazetnom tekste [Functioning of introductory elements in a modern newspaper text]. St. Petersburg, 1999, 202 p. (in Russ.)
11. Samoletova R. S. Strukturno-semanticheskie svoistva i funktsional'no-stilisticheskii status parentezy v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke [Structural-semantic properties and functional-stylistic status of parenthesis in modern German]. Minsk, Minsk State Linguistic Uni. Press, 1980, 219 p. (in Russ.)
12. Sing F. Grammatika kitaiskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Chinese language]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State Uni. Press, 2020, 764 p. (in Russ.)
13. Stunken A. E. Problema vvodnogo i vstavnogo elementa v potoke rechi: na materiale angliiskoi lingvisticheskoi prozy [The problem of the introductory and insertion element in the flow of speech: on the material of English linguistic prose]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State Uni. Press, 1974, 128 p. (in Russ.)
14. Sun Y., Kalinin O. I., Ignatenko A. V. The use of metaphor power indices for the analysis of speech impact in political public speeches. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 250–277. (in Russ.) DOI 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-250-277
Review
For citations:
Ignatenko A. Features of Parenthetical Constructions in Mo Yan’s Novel “Tired of Being Born and Dying” (2005). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2023;22(4):115-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-4-115-126