Features of the Technology of Ceramics of the Atlym Culture (Based on the Materials of Settlements of Barsova Gora)

Purpose. Barsova Gora is a unique archaeological and landscape site located in the Tyumen Region (West Siberia) of the Russian Federation. A technical and technological analysis of ceramics of the Atlym culture from Barsova Gora I/40 (13 vessels), Barsova Gora I/22a (7 vessels) and Barsova Gora IV/4 (9 vessels) settlements was carried out.

Results. It was found that for the pottery manufacture potters of the Atlym culture mainly selected ferruginous clays, varying in the degree of sandiness and the presence of natural inclusions of shells and vegetation fragments. At all sites, potters exploited several clay plots. Recipes and assortment of molding masses vary considerably from settlement to settlement. The most stable technology is typical for ceramics from the site Barsova Gora I/22a for which only one recipe (clay + chamotte) has been fixed. It testifies to homogeneity of pottery traditions that existed on this site. A similar trend is demonstrated by ceramics of the site Barsova Gora I/40, where uncalibrated chamotte was used as the main impurity. The pottery technology of these two sites is very similar, and, apparently, these settlements constituted one group of the Atlym population with similar skills. It is possible that representatives of this group could have participated in the genesis of the Krasnoozerskaya culture of the Ishim River basin, as they recorded significant similarities in the adaptive and constructive skills of pottery making. The opposite situation can be observed at the site of Barsova Gora IV/4, where six single and multi-component compositions have been identified, which indicates a mixture of pottery skills and techniques. Several different groups of potters may have lived at this site, using different assortments of impurities to compose the molding masses. Probably, the Barsova Gora IV/4 site was left by another group of the Atlym population with different pottery skills, which differ from the skills of the “Atlym” from Barsova Gora I/22a and I/40 settlements. It can be assumed that the Atlym population of Barsova Gora IV/4 came to Barsova Gora from other territories, possibly from the Lower Priirtysh.

Conclusion. The pottery technology of the sites Barsova Gora I/40 and I/22a has no direct analogues in the previously studied complexes of the Atlym culture in Western Siberia. For the vessels manufacturing technology of the Atlym culture in the territories of the Lower Irtysh River basin, Baraba and the Lower Ob River basin, the dominance of reipes with chamotte is not characteristic. At the same time, the use of chamotte as the main mineral additive and organic solutions is typical for ceramics of the later Krasnoozerskaya culture, which may be based on the Atlym culture. Vessel manufacturing techniques are also similar. Ceramics of the Atlym culture from the Barsova Gora IV/4 site demonstrates the greatest technological similarity with the pottery from The Lower Irtysh River basin. Potters of these territories used a similar range of mineral additives. The surfaces of the vessels were smoothed with a hard, smooth tool. The difference is manifested in the vessels design.

1. Arefev V. A., Rogozinnikova Yu. V. Syroi Agan, kompleks arkheologicheskikh pamyatnikov [Syroy Agan, a complex of archeological sites]. In: Yugoriya. Entsiklopediya Khanty-Mansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga [Ugoria. Encyclopedia of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous District]. Khanty-Mansiisk, Sokrat Publ., 2005, vol. 4 (supplementary), pp. 38–39. (in Russ.)

2. Bobrinsky A. A. Goncharnaya tekhnologiya kak ob'ekt istoriko-kul'turnogo izucheniya [Pottery technology as an object of historical and cultural study]. In: Aktual'nye problemy izucheniya drevnego goncharstva [Actual problems of studying ancient pottery]. Samara, SamSPU Press, 1999, pp. 5–109. (in Russ.)

3. Bobrinsky A. A. Goncharstvo Vostochnoi Evropy. Istochniki i metody izucheniya [Pottery of Eastern Europe. Sources and methods of study]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978, 272 p. (in Russ.)

4. Chemyakin Yu. P. Barsova Gora: ocherki arkheologii Surgutskogo Priob'ya. Drevnost' [Barsova Gora: Essays on the Archaeology of Surgut Priob'ye. Antiquity]. Surgut; Omsk, Omskii dom pechati Publ., 2008, 224 p. (in Russ.)

5. Chemyakin Yu. P., Koksharov S. F. Poselenie nachala I tysyacheletiya do n. e. na Barsovoi Gore [Settlement of the early 1st millennium BC on Barsova Gora]. In: Drevnie poseleniya Urala i Zapadnoi Sibiri [Ancient settlements of the Urals and Western Siberia]. Sverdlovsk, Ural State Uni. Press, 1984, pp. 115–130. (in Russ.)

6. Glushkov I. G., Zakhozhaya T. M. Keramika epokhi pozdnei bronzy Nizhnego Priirtysh'ya [Ceramics of the Late Bronze Age of the Lower Irtysh Region]. Surgut, SurSU Press, 2000, 201 p. (in Russ.)

7. Ilyushina V. V., Zimina O. Yu. Tekhnologiya izgotovleniya keramiki u naseleniya krasnoozerskoi kul'tury (po materialam poseleniya Mergen' 2 v Nizhnem Priishim'e) [Technology of ceramics production in the population of the Krasnoozerskaya culture (on the materials of the settlement Mergen 2 in Lower Priishimye)]. Rossiiskaya arkheologiya [Russian Archeology], 2017, no. 2, pp. 88–99. (in Russ.)

8. Kosarev M. F. Drevnie kul'tury Tomsko-Narymskogo Priob'ya [Ancient Cultures of the Tomsk-Narym Priob'y]. Moscow, Nauka, 1974, 220 p. (in Russ.)

9. Lvov Yu. A. Bolotnyi protsess kak faktor sredy obitaniya cheloveka v Zapadnoi Sibiri [Swamp process as a factor of human environment in Western Siberia]. In: Osobennosti estestvenno-geograficheskoi sredy i istoricheskie protsessy v Zapadnoi Sibiri [Features of natural-geographical environment and historical processes in Western Siberia]. Tomsk, TSU Press, 1979, pp. 12–18. (in Russ.)

10. Mylnikova L. N. Keramika perekhodnogo vremeni ot bronzovogo k zheleznomu veku lesostepnoi zony Zapadnoi Sibiri: dialog kul'tur [Ceramics of the Transitional Time from the Bronze to the Iron Age in the Forest-Steppe Zone of Western Siberia: Dialogue of Cultures]. Abstract of Dr. Hist. Sci. Diss. Novosibirsk, 2015, 42 p. (in Russ.)

11. Mylnikova L. N., Boldyrev V. V., Drebushchak V. A., Drebushchak T. N., Derevyanko E. I. Instrumental'noe issledovanie keramiki gorodishcha Chicha-1 [Instrumental Research of ceramics of Chicha-1 Fort Site]. In: Chicha – gorodishche perekhodnogo ot bronzy k zhelezu vremeni v Barabinskoi lesostepi [Chicha – Fort Site of Transition from Bronze to Iron Age in the Baraba Barabinsk forest-steppe]. Novosibirsk, IAET SB RAS Publ., 2009, vol. 3, pp. 150‒176. (in Russ.)

12. Skorobogatova A. Yu. Datirovka atlymskogo keramicheskogo kompleksa poseleniya Syroi Agan-5 [Dating of the Atlym ceramics complex of Syroy Agan-5]. In: Sokhranenie i izuchenie kul'turnogo naslediya Altaiskogo kraya [Conservation and study of the cultural heritage of the Altai Territory]. Barnaul, AltSU Press, 2013, no. 18–19, pp. 233–238. (in Russ.)

13. Skorobogatova A. Yu., Ponomaryova T. M. Peculiarities of the Atlym Ceramics Found in the Surgut Ob River Area (Based on the Materials of the Strelka Site). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2019, vol. 18, no. 3: Archaeology and Ethnography, pp. 74–89. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-3-74-89

14. Tsetlin Yu. B. Drevnyaya keramika: Teoriya i metody istoriko-kul’turnogo podkhoda [Ancient ceramics: Theory and methods of historical and cultural approach]. Moscow, IA RAS Publ., 2012, 379 p. (in Russ.)

15. Tsetlin Yu. B. Keramika. Ponyatiya i terminy istoriko-kul’turnogo podkhoda [Ceramics. Concepts and terms of the historical and cultural approach]. Moscow, IA RAS Publ., 2017, 346 p. (in Russ.)

16. Vasilev E. A. Atlymskaya kul'tura [Atlym culture]. In: Yugoriya. Entsiklopediya Khanty-Mansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga [Ugoria. Encyclopedia of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug]. Khanty-Mansiisk, Sokrat Publ., 2000, vol. 1, pp. 76–77. (in Russ.)

17. Vasilev E. A. Severo-taezhnoe Priob'e v epokhu pozdnei bronzy (khronologiya i kul'turnaya prinadlezhnost' pamyatnikov) [The North taiga Priob'ye in the Late Bronze Age (chronology and cultural belonging of sites)]. In: Arkheologiya i etnografiya Priob'ya [Archaeology and ethnography of Priob'ye]. Tomsk, TSU Press, 1982, pp. 3–14. (in Russ.)

18. Vasileva I. N., Salugina N. P. Elektronnyi katalog etalonov po keramicheskoi trasologii [Electronic catalog of etalons for ceramic tracing]. Samara, 2020. (in Russ.) URL: http://archsamara.ru/katalog (accessed 01.01.2022).

19. Zimina O. Yu., Sizov O. S., Tsembalyuk S. I. Strategii zaseleniya na rubezhe bronzovogo i zheleznogo vekov: prirodnye i paleoekonomicheskie faktory (lesostepnaya – podtaezhnaya zony v doline r. Tobol) [Population strategies at the Bronze and Iron Age boundary: natural and paleoeconomic factors (forest-steppe – subtaiga zone in the Tobol River valley)]. Ural'skii istoricheskii vestnik [The Ural Historical Bulletin], 2021, no. 3 (72), pp. 50–60. (in Russ.) DOI 10.30759/1728-9718-2021-3(72)-50-60