Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

A Mammoth Figure from Ust’-Kova Site: Results of Microscopic Study

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-7-56-66

Abstract

Purpose. The Ust’-Kova site is one of the most famous Upper Paleolithic multi-layered sites of the Northern Angara region in which ivory artifacts were found. The postulate that works of art could play a decisive role in highlighting local differences in the Upper Paleolithic of Eurasia remains a topical one. This figure of the mammoth is a rare case of a zoomorphic Paleolithic image in general and a unique image of this animal in a Siberian archaic tradition, in comparison with the known images found in Europe and on the Russian Plain. Restoration work on this unique figure of the mammoth opened up new possibilities for a comprehensive microscopic study related to the technology of manufacturing art figures and the analysis of paints on their surface. Results. To determine the elemental composition of paint on the surface of the figure, we used the scanning electron microscopy method and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. This allowed us to study the microstructure of the paint, determine the elemental composition of the pigment in the sample and its quantitative indices. We distinguished black paint with domination of manganese, iron and magnesium and red paint with the dominance of chlorine, phosphorus, alum inosilicates, iron, manganese. In the latter case, we definitely identify an artificial pigment, as indicated by a wide range of additives. Conclusion. As a result of experimental and technological research, we established that the process of making the figure occurred in several stages. On every stage we reveal peculiarities of using the tools. High efficiency of the manufacturer's work is evident due to using the minimum of the tool kit, only a planning knife and a pair of cutters. Small details of the figure remained unworked. They are unlikely to be a consequence of the personal abilities of the work of the ancient master. The master did not use such tools as a carver or a simple drill. This can be considered a characteristic detail of the process of manufacturing. Relative primitiveness of the item is probably due to the scantiness of the toolkit and the relatively low level of technology development during the period studied. In general, the figurative art of the Ust’-Kova site is characterized by geometrized stylization, primitive surface treatment, lack of detail and ornamentation, which gives it a peculiar individuality.

About the Authors

P. V. Volkov
Novosibirsk State University; Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


L. V. Lbova
Novosibirsk State University; Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


Yu. S. Gubar
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation


O. L. Shvets
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


References

1. Абрамова З. А. Палеолитическое искусство на территории СССР. М.; Л.: Наука, 1962. 86 с

2. Акимова Е. В., Кукса Е. Н., Стасюк И. В., Томилова Е. А., Харевич В. М., Мотузко А. Н. Последние раскопки палеолитической стоянки Усть-Кова в Северном Приангарье // Верхний палеолит Северной Евразии и Америки: памятники, культуры, традиции. СПб.: Петербургскоевостоковедение, 2014. С. 311-319

3. Акимова Е. В., Метляев С. В. Интерпретация скульптурного изображения с палеолитической стоянки Усть-Кова // Древности Приенисейского края. Красноярск, Изд-во КГПУ, 2003. Вып. 2. С. 18-19

4. Береговая Н. П. Палеолитические местонахождения СССР // МИА. 81. М.; Л.: Наука, 1960. 218 с

5. Васильевский Р. С., Бурилов В. В., Дроздов Н. И. Археологические памятники Северного Приангарья. Новосибирск: Наука, 1988. 226 c

6. Васильевский Р. С., Дроздов Н. И. Палеолитические скульптурные изображения из Восточной Сибири // Пластика и рисунки древних культур. Новосибирск: Наука, 1983. С. 59- 65

7. Дроздов Н. И. Каменный век Северного Приангарья: Автореф. дис. … канд. ист. наук. Новосибирск, 1981. 16 с

8. Каменный век Южного Приангарья. Бельский геоархеологический район. Иркутск: Изд-во ИГУ, 2001. Т. 2. 242 с

9. Шмидт И. В. К проблемам переосмысления образности фигурки из Усть-Ковы // Археология, этнография, палеоэкология Северной Евразии: проблемы, поиск, открытия: Материалы LI РАЭСК. Красноярск: Изд-во КГПУ, 2011. С. 9-11

10. Хроностратиграфия палеолитических памятников Средней Сибири (бассейн Енисея). Путеводитель экскурсии Международного симпозиума. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИИФиФ СО АН СССР, 1990. С. 169-175

11. Lbova L., Volkov P. Processing Technology for the Objects of Mobile Art in the Upper Paleolithic of Siberia (the Malta Site). Quaternary International, 2016, vol. 403, p. 16-22


Review

For citations:


Volkov P.V., Lbova L.V., Gubar Yu.S., Shvets O.L. A Mammoth Figure from Ust’-Kova Site: Results of Microscopic Study. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2018;17(7):56-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-7-56-66

Views: 153


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)