On the Etymology of the Enets Presumptive Marker -to: Borrowing from Nganasan
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-9-64-73
Abstract
Purpose. The article considers etymology of the evidential marker -to of the Forest and Tundra Enets which expresses the presumptive meaning (the speaker did not witness the situation, and his judgment on it is an assumption based on general knowledge).
Results. Enets suffix is compared to Nganasan clitic -BTA (used either as intraclitic or as enclitic), which is used primarily in interrogative sentences and also marks the assumption. The article gives an overview of semantics of the compared forms of Enets and Nganasan, as well as an overview of their morphosyntactic and morphophonological properties. However, historical phonetics does not allow to consider the Enets and Nganasan morphemes as going back to a common protoform. The Enets marker can rather be considered as borrowed from Nganasan. This conclusion can be supported by the fact that the same phonetic correspondence is observed in a number of undoubted lexical borrowings from Nganasan into Enets. The article provides a list of such words.
Conclusion. It would be even more accurate to say that the Enets presumptive forms are a material-structural borrowing from Nganasan. Namely, not only a morpheme per se is borrowed from Nganasan into Enets: synthetic Enets presumptive forms are an exact structural analogue of the corresponding Nganasan forms.
Keywords
About the Author
A. Yu. UrmanchievaRussian Federation
Anna Yu. Urmanchieva, Doctor of Sciences (Philology)
Scopus Author ID 57170923300
WoS Researcher ID A-3837-2016
St. Petersburg
References
1. Aikhenvald A. Yu. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press, 2004, xxvii + 452 p.
2. Helimski E. A. Ocherk orfonologii i slovoi enitel’noi orfologii nganasanskogo ya yka [Essay on morphophonology and inflectional morphology of the Nganasan language]. In: Helimski E. A. (ed.) Taymyrskii etnolingvisticheskii sbornik [Taimyr ethnolinguistic collection]. Moscow, Russian State Uni. for the Humanities, 1994, pp. 190–221. (in Russ.)
3. Janhunen J. Samojedischer Wortschatz: Gemeinsamojedische Etymologien (Castrenianum Toimitteita, 17). Helsinki, Helsinki Uni. Press, 1977, 186 p.
4. Katzschmann M. hresto athia ganasanica. exte. erset ung. Glossar. Grammatik. Norderstedt, Books on Demand GmbH, 2008, 604 S.
5. Künnap A. On the Enets evidential suffixes. Linguistica Uralica, 2002, vol. 38, iss. 2, pp. 145–153.
6. Mikola T. Studien zur Geschichte der Samojedischen Sprachen. Aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von Beáta Wagner-Nagy. (Studia Uralo-Altaica. Vol. 45). Szeged, SzTE Finnisch-Ugrisches Institut, 2004, 175 p.
7. Labanauskas K. Die probabilitiven Formen des Enzischen. Sovetskoe finnougrovedeniye, 1987, vol. 23, pp. 275–284.
8. Plungian V. A. Vvedeniye v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskiye znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira [The Introduction into Grammatical Semantics: Grammatical Meaning and Gra atical Syste s of the World’s Languages]. Мoscow, Russian State Uni. for the Humanities Press, 2011, 672 p. (in Russ.)
9. Sorokina I. P., Bolina D. S. Enetskie teksty [Enets texts]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2005, 350 p. (in Russ.).
10. Urmanchieva A. Yu. Formy so znacheniem epistemicheskoi modalnosti v enetskom yazyke [Forms with the meaning of epistemic modality in Enets]. In: Daniel M. A. et al. (eds.). Yazyk. Konstanty. Peremennye. Pamyati A. E. Kibrika [Language. Constants. Variables. In memory of A. E. Kibrik]. St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2018, pp. 579–595 (in Russ.)
11. Wagner-Nagy B. A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden, Brill, 2018, 583 p.
Review
For citations:
Urmanchieva A.Yu. On the Etymology of the Enets Presumptive Marker -to: Borrowing from Nganasan. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2023;22(9):64-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-9-64-73