THE DOCTRINE OF PASSIVE OBEDIENCE IN STUART ENGLAND, 1603-1688
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-8-20-29
Abstract
The article examines the history of the doctrine of passive obedience in England during the Stuart period. Traditionally weak financial and legal basis for royal absolutism in England forced monarchs to rely thoroughly on ideology. The concept of passive obedience promoted by the loyal Anglican clergy was one of the key elements of the absolutist ideology of the 17th century. This doctrine was employed as a counterbalance to revolutionary resistance and monarchomach theories embraced by protestant dissenters and papist recusants alike. During the course of the century the doctrine was embraced by numerous representatives of the Church of England’s establishment, including, but not limited to, John Donn, Roger Maynwaring, George Hickes, Edmund Bohun and many others and disseminated via an array of sermons and pamphlets. One component of the doctrine: non-resistance, was particularly stressed. Several political, social and economic factors conditioned the employment of this doctrine. The first instance of its pronouncement followed the failure of the Gunpowder plot and the necessity to refute catholic contractual theories. Charles I saw the doctrine of passive obedience as both the means to maintain social peace and promote fiscal interests. The new impetus the doctrine gained in the later years of the Restoration: an attempt to integrate it into the ‘ancient constitution’ failed, yet the doctrine of passive obedience was taken up as the chief ideological tool by the Anglican church and employed as a mighty instrument of suppressing resistance and dissent. The Glorious Revolution weakened the grasp of the doctrine in the minds of the English, though by no means killed it. Yet, the regime erected by the Convention of 1689 and strengthened by William of Orange claimed as much of its legitimacy in revolutionary resistance. Thus, henceforth the ideas of passive obedience and non-resistance could not be used as the sole basis of legitimate power in England.
References
1. Аверьянова Е. В., Баязитова Г. И., Васильева Ж. Ю., Исаева Е. В., Кондратьев С. В., Кондратьева Т. Н., Новокрещенных Е. В., Соколовская И. В. Проблема «послушания» (obedience) в английской конфессиональной мысли 1620-х гг. // Вестн. ТюмГУ. Гуманитарные исследования. Философия. 2013. № 10. С. 146-153.
2. Андерсен П. Родословная абсолютистского государства. М.: Территория будущего, 2010. 511 с.
3. Кондратьев С. В. «Все могут короли, все могут короли…?» (Теория и практика в предреволюционной Англии). IV: Голоса Роджера Мэнверинга // Европа: международный альманах. Тюмень, 2011. Вып. 10. С. 38-74.
4. Кондратьев С. В. Джон Донн о порядке, послушании и проповеди // Вестн. ТюмГУ. Гуманитарные исследования. История. 2013. № 2. С. 67-72.
5. Кондратьев С. В. Парламентарии против Роджера Мэнверинга, или «свобода» и «право» versus «послушание» и «прерогатива» // Изв. высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2012. № 1. С. 207-220.
6. Хеншелл Н. Миф абсолютизма. Перемены и преемственность в развитии западноевропейской монархии раннего Нового времени. СПб.: Алетейя, 2003. 272 с.
7. Burgess G. The Divine Right of Kings Reconsidered // The English Historical Review. 1992. Vol. 107. No. 425. P. 837-861.
8. Coward B. The Stuart Age: England, 1603-1714. London: Routledge, 2014. 587 p.
9. Figgis J. N. The Divine Right of Kings. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1914. 406 p.
10. Kraynak R. P. John Locke: From Absolutism to Toleration // The American Political Science Review. Vol. 74. No. 1. Mar., 1980. P. 53-69.
11. Maccauley T. B. The History of England from the Accession of James II. Boston; New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Co, 1901. 589 p.
12. Sensabaugh G. F. Milton and the Doctrine of Passive Obedience // Huntington Library Quarterly. Vol. 13. No. 1. Nov., 1949. P. 19-54.
13. Skinner Q. The Foundations of the Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. Vol. 2: The Age of Reformation. 414 p.
14. Smuts M. Political Thought in Early Stuart Britain // A Companion to Stuart Britain / Ed. by B. Coward. Oxford, 2003. P. 271-289.
15. Snapp H. F. The Impeachment of Roger Maynwaring // Huntington Library Quarterly. Vol. 30. No. 3. May, 1967. P. 217-232.
16. Sommerville J. P. Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England, 1603-1640. Harlow: Longman, 1999. 304 p.
17. The Varieties of British Political Thought 1500-1800 / Eds. J. G. A. Pocock, G. J. Schochet, L. G. Schwoerer. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993. 372 p.
Review
For citations:
Zhuravlev A.V. THE DOCTRINE OF PASSIVE OBEDIENCE IN STUART ENGLAND, 1603-1688. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2018;17(8):20-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-8-20-29
Views:
276
Email this article 