Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Alternation of Vowels in Roots and Personal-Possessive Affixes of Nouns in the Surgut Dialect of the Khanty Language

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-9-78-101

Abstract

Personal-possessive 1st and 2nd person singular noun affixes in the Surgut dialect of the Khanty language, as well as1st person plural noun affixes (irregular in various dialects) with singular objects are represented by several allomorphs: 1SG.SG - =əм / =эм / =ам; 2SG.SG - =əн / (=эн) / ; 1PL.SG - =Vв. When the personal-possessive affixes are attached, vowel alternation occurs in several roots. The choice of specific allomorphs and the presence or absence of alternation depends on the root vowels. In roots with short vowels, there is no alternation, and affixes with lower vowels are used: =ам (1SG.SG) and (1SG.SG). When the personal-possessive affixes are attached to roots with long vowels, lower vowels are replaced by corresponding upper vowels. After roots with long upper vowels, =эм (1SG.SG) and (2SG.SG) affix variants are used, and no alternation occurs, because vowels can no longer be ‘moved’ upwards. After stems with long non-upper vowels, the =əм (1SG.SG) and =əн (2SG.SG) affixes are used, and alternation takes place in the root. This is not true for some specific cases: in roots with long middle vowels, these processes may occur according to the upper vowel model, or the lower vowel model; for example, the lexeme вӧӈ ‘son-in-law’, which contains a short vowel, can be followed by affixes with the vowel э, typical for roots with long upper vowels. Our research is based on field materials collected in the Surgut District, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, or Yugra, in 2017-2019. The audio records were segmented and annotated via Praat software. Acoustic analysis and further statistical analysis of our data was performed on the basis of Emu-SDMS corpus system and R language.

About the Authors

N. B. Koshkareva
Institute of Philology SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation


T. V. Timkin
Institute of Philology SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation


P. I. Li
Institute of Philology SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Волкова А. Н., Соловар В. Н. Хантыйско-русский тематический словарь (сургутский диалект) / Отв. ред. З. С. Рябчикова. СПб.: Изд-во РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, 2018. 212 с.

2. Ли П. И., Тимкин Т. В. Проблема диалектной принадлежности полевых материалов по хантыйскому языку с реки Тромъеган // Документирование языков и диалектов коренных малочисленных народов России: Тез. докл. междунар. науч. конф. СПб.: ИЛИ РАН, 2019. С. 44-47.

3. ТерёшкинН. И. Очерки диалектов хантыйского языка. Часть первая. Ваховский диалект. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1961. 205 с.

4. Терёшкин Н. И. Словарь восточно-хантыйских диалектов. Л.: Наука, 1981. 544 с.

5. Хонти Л. Хантыйский язык // Языки мира. Уральские языки / Под ред. В. Н. Ярцевой. М.: Наука, 1993. С. 300-319.

6. Чепреги М. Сказки и рассказы сургутских ханты: Фольклорный сборник / Под ред. А. С. Песиковой; пер. на рус. Т. А. Ефремовой, А. С. Песиковой. Тюмень: Формат, 2015. 118 с.

7. Чепреги М. Сургутский диалект хантыйского языка / Под ред. Н. Б. Кошкаревой; ред. хантыйского текста А. С. Песикова; пер. на рус. Т. А. Ефремова. Ханты-Мансийск: Печатный мир г. Ханты-Мансийск, 2017. 275 с.

8. Csepregi M. Szurguti osztják chrestomathia. Szeged, 1998, Suppl. 6: Studia uralo-altaica.

9. Filchenko A. Aspects of the Grammar of Eastern Khanty. Tomsk, TSPU-Press, 2010, 536 p.

10. Helimski E. Umlaut in Diachronie - Ablaut in Synchronie: Urostjakischer Umlaut und ostjakischer Ablaut. In: Problemy izucheniya dal'nego rodstva yazykov na rubezhe tret'ego tysyacheletiya. Doklady i tezisy nauchnoi konferentsii 29 maya - 2 iyunya 2000 g. [Issues of Research of Distant Relations between Languages at the Dawn of Third Millennium. Reports from the Academic Conference, May 29 - June 2, 2000]. Moscow, 2000, p. 194-200.

11. Honti L. Beobachtungen über die Laut- und Formenlehre gegenwärtiger Surguter Mundarten der Ostjakischen. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarium Hungaricae, 1977, no. 27, p. 271-286.

12. Paasonen H., Vértes E. Ostjakische grammatikalische Aufzeichnungen nach den Dialektenan der Konda und am Jugan. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 1963, no. 66, p. 73-77.

13. Winkelmann R., Harrington J., Jänsch K. EMU-SDMS: Advanced speech database management and analysis in R. Computer Speech & Language, 2017, vol. 45, p. 392-410.


Review

For citations:


Koshkareva N.B., Timkin T.V., Li P.I. Alternation of Vowels in Roots and Personal-Possessive Affixes of Nouns in the Surgut Dialect of the Khanty Language. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2019;18(9):78-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-9-78-101

Views: 198


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)