Preview

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology

Advanced search

Comparison Study of Cultural Layers Preservation at the Moiltyn Am Site (Central Mongolia)

https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-5-70-85

Abstract

Archaeological sites with unclear conditions of sediment accumulation and stratigraphic disturbances are always complicated to research. Usually other sites in the region with better preservation of cultural layers helps to understand and divide them into cultural chronological stages. However lack of such sites results in the need to find other approaches and research methods to study stratigraphic positions of cultural horizons. Purpose. This article considers approaches and methods and their application to estimate the preservation of cultural layers at the Upper Paleolithic site of Moiltyn Am in Central Mongolia. Results. The authors analyzed positions of artifacts from layers 1.2, 2, 3 and 4. Indexes of layer 1.2 fall within the value range, characteristic to rockfall. Layers 2 and 3 are also close to rockfall, but the level of isotropy falls outside the limits of its range. Layer 4 is closer to the range of solifluction. Conclusions. The authors correlated lithological divisions, revealed in 2018-2019, and stratigraphic units, that previous researchers divided and described. Sediments of Layer 4 were accumulated under the solifluction process and went through post-sedimentological disturbances, that also impacted the underlying layers. Layers 2 and 3 were formed under drier conditions.

About the Authors

D. V. Marchenko
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


A. M. Khatsenovich
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


E. P. Rybin
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS
Russian Federation


D. Bazargur
Institute of Archaeology MAS
Russian Federation


B. Gunchinsuren
Institute of Archaeology MAS
Russian Federation


J. W. Olsen
School of Anthropology, University of Arizona
Russian Federation


References

1. Деревянко А. П., Кандыба А. В., Петрин В. Т. Палеолит Орхона. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2010. 384 с.

2. Окладников А. П. Палеолит Центральной Азии. Мойлтын ам. Новосибирск: Наука, 1981. 460 с.

3. Рыбин Е. П., Хаценович А. М., Кандыба А. В. Палеолитическое заселение Монголии: по данным абсолютной хронологии // Изв. АлтГУ. 2016. Вып. 2 (90). С. 245-254.

4. Хаценович А. М. Ранние этапы верхнего палеолита Северной Монголии: Автореф. дис. … канд. ист. наук. Новосибирск, 2018. 30 с.

5. Bertran P., Fontugne M., Jaubert J. Permafrost Aggradation followed by Brutal Degradation During the Upper Pleniglacial in Mongolia: the Probable Response to the H2 Heinrich Event at 21 kyr BP. Permafrost Periglacial Process, 2003, vol. 14, p. 1-9.

6. Bertran P., Texier J-P. Fabric Analysis: Application to Paleolithic Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1995, vol. 22, p. 521-535.

7. Bertran P., Hétu B., Texier J.-P., Van Steijn H. Fabric characteristics of subaerial slope deposits. Sedimentology, 1997, vol. 44, p. 1-16.

8. Domínguez-Rodrigo M., Uribelarrea D., Santonja M., Bunn H. T., García-Pérez A., Pérez-González A., Panera J., Rubio-Jara S., Mabulla A., Baquedano E., Yravedra J., Diez-Martín F. Autochthonous anisotropy of archaeological materials by the action of water: experimental and archaeological reassessment of the orientation patterns at the Olduvai sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, vol. 41, p. 44-68.

9. Bertran P., Beauval C., Boulogne S., Brenet M., Costamagno S., Feuillet T., Laroulandie V., Lenoble A., Malaurent Ph., Mallye J.-B. Experimental archaeology in a mid-latitude periglacial context: insight into site formation and taphonomic processes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, vol. 57, p. 283-301.

10. Lenoble A., Bertran P. Fabric of Palaeolithic levels: methods and implications for site formation processes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2004, vol. 31, p. 457-469.

11. Lenoble A., Bertran P., Lacrampe F. Solifluction-induced modifications of archaeological levels: simulation based on experimental data from a modern periglacial slope and application to French Palaeolithic sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, vol. 35, p. 99-110.

12. McPherron S. J. P. Artifact orientations and site formation processes from total station proveniences. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2005, vol. 32, p. 1003-1014.

13. McPherron S. J. P. Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations. PLoS ONE, 2018, vol. 13 (1). DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190195

14. Texier J. P., Bertran P., Coutard J. P., Francou B., Gabert P., Guadelli J. L., Ozouf J. C., Plisson H., Raynal J. P., Vivent D. TRANSIT, An Experimental Archaeological Program in Periglacial Environment: Problem, Methodology, First Results. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 1998, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 433-473.


Review

For citations:


Marchenko D.V., Khatsenovich A.M., Rybin E.P., Bazargur D., Gunchinsuren B., Olsen J.W. Comparison Study of Cultural Layers Preservation at the Moiltyn Am Site (Central Mongolia). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2020;19(5):70-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-5-70-85

Views: 135


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-7919 (Print)