Early Iron Age Sword from the Territory of the Middle Yenisei
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-7-135-143
Abstract
Purpose. The article is devoted to the characteristics of a double-edged iron sword, which can be attributed to the unique phenomena of the early Iron Age of the Minusinsk Basin.
Results. According to its morphological characteristics, the sword is an increased technological modification of the traditional Tagar dagger. The total length of the sword is 59.5 cm; the width of the lenticular blade in cross-section is about 7 cm. The handle with a volute-like pommel is separated from the blade by a narrow butterfly-shaped crosshair. The length of the hilt is 8 cm, which corresponds to the size of the hilts of most Scythian swords. This is a very small size, since in men the average palm width is about 12 cm. Probably, the rounded outlines of the pommel and narrow crosshairs allow, due to their shape, to hold the short handle of a heavy sword more tightly.
Conclusion. According to the classification of O. I. Kurinskikh, Scythian swords with a narrow butterfly-shaped crosshair and volute-like pommel are included in Group III, Type II A2 dating from the end of the 5th – 4th centuries BC, which corresponds to the boundary between the Podgorny and Saragashen stages of the Tagar culture. The earliest form of sword hilts with typologically similar forms of crosshairs (kidney-shaped, heart-shaped, butterfly-shaped) with bar-shaped pommels appeared in the North Caucasus in the first half of the 7th century BC. On the territory of the Minusinsk Basin, most morphologically similar daggers are usually dated to the 6th – 4th centuries BC. Before the discovery of the Krasnoyarsk sword, long-bladed iron weapons were not known there. At the same time, swords of the Scythian time were found in the nearest regions of Altai and Kazakhstan. The later appearance of the technology for processing iron in the Minusinsk Basin makes it possible to consider the Krasnoyarsk sword an import item. According to another hypothesis, it belongs to the period of the late 3rd – 2nd centuries BC, when local craftsmen mastered the processing of iron and began to make massive quantities of weapons and tools from low-carbon steel. In doing so, they copied traditional archaic forms.
Keywords
Middle Yenisei,
early Iron Age,
Saragashen stage of Tagar culture,
Tesin culture,
barrow,
military affairs,
accidental find,
iron sword
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out as part of the implementation of the State Task of the Ministry of Education and Science in the field of scientific activity (project no. FSUS-2020-0021)
About the Authors
O. A. Mitko
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg A. Mitko, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Head of the Archaeology Sector of the Laboratory for Humanitarian Research
Novosibirsk
S. G. Skobelev
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Skobelev, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Head of the Laboratory for Humanitarian Research
Novosibirsk
References
1. Chlenova N. L. Bronzovyi mech iz Minusinskoi kotloviny [Bronze sword from the Minusinsk depression]. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta istorii material’noi kul’tury [Brief reports of the Institute for the History of Material Culture], 1955, iss. 60, p. 135–138. (in Russ.)
2. Chlenova N. L. Proiskhozhdenie i rannyaya istoriya plemen tagarskoi kul’tury [Origin and early history of the tribes of the Tagar culture]. Moscow, Nauka, 1967, 300 p. (in Russ.)
3. Frolov Ya. V. Mech skifskogo vremeni s territorii lesostepnogo Altaya [The sword of the Scythian time from the territory of the forest-steppe Altai]. Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archaeology, ethnography and anthropology of Eurasia], 2016, no. 8 (44), p. 56–62. (in Russ.)
4. Gavrilyuk A. G., Tairov A. D. Evolyutsiya nekotorykh form savromato-sarmatskikh mechei [Evolution of some forms of Sauromat-Sarmatian swords]. In: Voennoe delo naseleniya yuga Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Military affairs of the population of the south of Siberia and the Far East]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1993, p. 73–88. (in Russ.)
5. Khazanov A. M. Ocherki voennogo dela sarmatov [Essays on the military affairs of the Sarmatians]. Moscow, Nauka, 1971, 172 p. (in Russ.)
6. Klepikov V. M. Sarmaty Nizhnego Povolzh’ya v IV–III vv. do n. e. [Sarmatians of the Lower Volga region in the 4th – 3rd centuries BC]. Volgograd, Volgograd State Uni. Press, 2002, 216 p. (in Russ.)
7. Kokorina Yu. G. Mech, akinak, kinzhal – kakoi termin vybrat’? (k postanovke problemy) [Sword, akinak, dagger – which term to choose? (to the problem statement)]. Arkheologicheskie vesti [Archaeological News], 2008, no. 15, p. 75–83. (in Russ.)
8. Kungurov V. A., Kungurova N. Yu. Nekropol’ pervoi poloviny II tys. v basseine r. Kan [Necropolis of the first half of the 2nd millennium in Kan]. Drevnosti Sibiri i Tsentral’noi Azii [Antiquities of Siberia and Central Asia], 2018, no. 9 (21), p. 69–92. (in Russ.)
9. Kurinskikh O. I. Klinkovoe oruzhie rannikh kochevnikov VI–I vv. do n. e. iz mogil’nikov u s. Pokrovka (levoberezh’e Ileka) [Blade weapons of early nomads of the 6th – 1st centuries BC from the burial grounds near the village Pokrovka (left bank of Ilek)]. Rossiskaya arkheologiya [Russian Archaeology], 2012, no. 2. p. 82–90. (in Russ.)
10. Kuzmin N. Yu. Pogrebal’nye pamyatniki khunno-syan’biiskogo vremeni v stepyakh Srednego Eniseya: Tesinskaya kul’tura [Burial monuments of the Xiongnu-Xianbei period in the steppes of the Middle Yenisei: Tesinskaya culture]. St. Petersburg, “Aising” Publ., 2011, 456 p. (in Russ.)
11. Melyukova A. I. Vooruzhenie skifov [Armament of the Scythians]. In: Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov [A set of archaeological sources]. Moscow, Nauka, 1964, iss. D1–4, 113 p. (in Russ.)
12. Mogilnikov V. A. Naselenie Verkhnego Priob’ya v seredine – vtoroi polovine I tys. do n. e. [Population of the Upper Ob region in the middle – second half of the 1st millennium BC]. Moscow, IA RAS Publ., 1997, 196 p. (in Russ.)
13. Mogilnikov V. A., Mednikova E. M. Nakhodki metallicheskikh izdelii rannego zheleznogo veka iz Novoobinki (Altaiskii krai) [Finds of early Iron Age metal products from Novoobinka (Altai Territory)]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya [Soviet Archaeology], 1985, no. 1, p. 179–185. (in Russ.)
14. Seitkaliev M. K. Kinzhal redkogo tipa iz mogil’nika Temirlanovka-1 (predvaritel’naya publikatsiya) [A rare type dagger from the Timrlanovka-1 burial ground (preliminary publication)]. Izvestiya NAN RK. Seriya obshchestvennykh nauk [News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Social Science Series], 2013, no. 3, p. 60–70. (in Russ.)
15. Simonenko A. V. Sarmatskie mechi i kinzhaly na territorii Severnogo Prichernomor’ya [Sarmatian swords and daggers on the territory of the Northern Black Sea region]. In: Vooruzhenie skifov i sarmatov [Armament of the Scythians and Sarmatians]. Kiev, “Naukova Dumka” Publ., 1984, p. 129–147. (in Russ.)
16. Skobelev S. G., Ryumshin M. A. Novye materialy po dlinnoklinkovomu oruzhiyu eniseiskikh kyrgyzov v razvitom i pozdnem srednevekov’e [New materials on long-bladed weapons of the Yenisei Kyrgyz in the developed and late Middle Ages]. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2010, vol. 9, no. 7: Archaeology and Ethnography, p. 144–154. (in Russ.)
17. Smirnov K. F. Vooruzhenie savromatov [Armament of the Savromats]. In: Materialy i issledovaniya po arkheologii SSSR [Materials and research on archaeology of the USSR]. Moscow, AS USSR Publ., 1961, no. 101, 162 p. (in Russ.)
18. Soenov V. I. Nakhodka zheleznogo palasha na Altae [Finding an iron broadsword in Altai]. In: Sokhranenie i izuchenie kul’turnogo naslediya Altaiskogo kraya [Preservation and study of the cultural heritage of the Altai Territory]. Barnaul, Altay State Uni. Press, 2017, iss. 23, p. 142– 150. (in Russ.)
19. Voroshilov A. N. Sluchainye nakhodki arkhaicheskikh akinakov kak istochnik po istorii lesostepnogo Podon’ya v ranneskifskuyu epokhu [Accidental finds of archaic akinaks as a source on the history of the forest-steppe Don region in the early Scythian era]. In: Sluchainye nakhodki: khronologiya, atributsiya, istoriko-kul’turnyi kontekst [Accidental finds: chronology, attribution, historical and cultural context]. Materials of the thematic scientific conference. St. Petersburg, December 16–19, 2008. St. Petersburg, 2008, p. 91–96. (in Russ.)
20. Zinyakov N. M. K istorii osvoeniya zheleza v Minusinskoi kotlovine [To the history of the development of iron in the Minusinsk depression]. In: Skifo-sibirskoe kul’turno-istoricheskoe edinstvo [Scythian-Siberian cultural-historical unity]. Materials of the 1st All-Union Archaeological Conference. Kemerovo, Kemerovo State Uni. Press, 1980, p. 66–73. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mitko O.A., Skobelev S.G. Early Iron Age Sword from the Territory of the Middle Yenisei. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(7):135-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-7-135-143
Views:
442
JATS XML
Email this article 