Teleology of A. P. Chekhov’s Story “My Life” (Theme and Thematical Motifs)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-9-75-84
Abstract
Purpose. The study is devoted to main thematical motifs of Chekhov’s story “My Life”. The correspondence between them reveals thematical integrity of the story. Teleology, the philosofical and conceptual aim of literary creative work, gets its manifestation by means of thematic unity.
Results. The hero of the story, Misail Poloznev, breaks off relations with his narrow-minded father, an untalented civil architect. Gentry son, Misail would not choose some respectable job and prefers to work as a house-painter. He declares the importance of manual labor, so he feels like a social outcast in the town. The first leading motif of the story is a labor necessity. Another house-painter, Redka, shares its opinion. His credo is no lie, no deceive, technical skills. True and untrue way of living is the next important motif in the plot and thematical structure of the story. It realizes in two subjects: Masha Dolzhikova’s slogan “Everything is being past through” and Doctor Blagovo’s theory of progress indifferent to ethic goals of self-perfection. Misail Polosnev, on contrary, is sure that “nothing gets past through without a trace”, that a man is responsible on his deeds.
The motif of life as a play is a derivate of the responsibility motif. Masha plays in life like an actress. She and Dr. Dolzhikov are completely egoistic, so Misail’s father is. Misail, his sister and Redka live for others’ good. Finally, this way is the only right way to live.
Conclusion. The general theme of Chekov’s story “Me Life” is free will of the person tied with his or hers sense of responsibility. Motifs of free labor, true living and common duty units the thematical wholeness of the story. Its teleology is a need of ethic existence for everyone
About the Author
L. N. Sinyakova
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyudmila N. Sinyakova, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor
Novosibirsk
References
1. Bakhtin M. M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [Problem of Substance, Material, and Form in Literary Creative Work]. In: Bakhtin M. M. On Literature and Aestetics. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1975, pp. 6–71. (in Russ.)
2. Bogoderova A. A. Syuzhetnaya situatsiya ukhoda v russkoy literature vtoroy poloviny XIX veka [Plot Situation of Leaving Home in Russian Literature of the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Cand. Philol. Sci. Syn. Diss. Novosibirsk, 2011, 16 p. (in Russ.)
3. Chekhov A. P. Complete Works and Letters. In 30 vols. Works. In 18 vols. Moscow, Nauka, 1985, vol. 9, 543 p. (in Russ.)
4. Linkov V. Ya. “Nichto ne prokhodit bessledno…” O povesti Chekhova “Moya zhizn′” [“Nothing Goes Through Without а Trace” On Chekhov’s Novella “My Life”]. Voprosy literatury [Issues of Literature], 2005, no. 3, pp. 293–304. (in Russ.)
5. Linkov V. Ya. Skeptitsizm i vera Chekhova [Scepticism and Credo of Chekhov]. Moscow, Moscow Uni. Press, 1995, 78 p. (in Russ.)
6. Myslivchenko A. G. K voprosu o mirovozzrenii A. P. Chekhova [On Chekhov’s Outlook]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy], 2012, no. 6, pp. 95–105. (in Russ.)
7. Poetika. Slovar′ aktual′nykh terminov i ponyatiy [Poetics. The Glossary of Actual Literary Criticism Terms and Concepts]. Ed. by N. D. Tamarchenko. Moscow, Kulagina Publ., Intrada Publ., 2008, 358 p. (in Russ.)
8. Rodionova O. I. A. P. Chekhov kak myslitel′. Religioznyye i filosofskiye idei [A. P. Chekhov – Philosopher. Religious and Philosophic Ideas]. Cand. Philos. Sci. Syn. Diss. Moscow, 2013, 18 p. (in Russ.)
9. Shcheglov Yu. K. Tri lektsii o Chekhove. Izbrannyye temy i motivy [Three Lections on Chekhov. Selected Themes and Motifs]. In: Shcheglov Yu. K. Selected Works. Moscow, Russian State Humanities Uni. Press, 2013, pp. 508–574. (in Russ.)
10. Skaftymov A. P. Nravstvennye iskaniya russkikh pisatelei: Stat’i i issledovaniya o russkikh klassikakh [Ethic Searches of Russian Writers: Articles and research about Russian classics]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1972, 543 p. (in Russ.)
11. Skaftymov A. P. O povestyakh Chekhova “Palata № 6” i “Moya zhizn’” [On Chekhov’s Stories “Ward No. 6” and “My Life”]. In: Skaftymov A. P. Nravstvennye iskaniya russkikh pisatelei: Stat’i i issledovaniya o russkikh klassikakh [Ethic Searches of Russian Writers: Articles and research about Russian classics]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1972, pp. 381– 403. (in Russ.)
12. Skaftymov A. P. Tematicheskaya kompozitsiya romana “Idiot” [Thematic Composition of the novel “Idiot”]. In: Skaftymov A. P. Nravstvennye iskaniya russkikh pisatelei: Stat’i i issledovaniya o russkikh klassikakh [Ethic Searches of Russian Writers: Articles and research about Russian classics]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1972, pp. 23–87. (in Russ.)
13. Sukhikh I. N. Problemy poetiki A. P. Chekhova [Problems of Poetics of A. P. Chekhov]. Leningrad, Leningrad Uni. Press, 1987, 187 p. (in Russ.)
14. Volodina N. V. “Teleologiya” kak filosofsko-esteticheskaya i istoriko-literaturnaya kategoriya [Theleology as Philosophical and Literary History Category]. Stephanos, 2016, no. 4, pp. 172–181.
15. Zaytseva T. B. Khudozhestvennaya antropologiya A. P. Chekhova: Ekzistentsial′nyy aspekt (Chekhov i Kirkegor) [The Literary Anthropology of A. P. Chkekhov. An Existence Aspect. Chekhov and Kierkegaard]. Dr. Philol. Sci. Syn. Diss. Ekaterinburg, 2015, 42 p. (in Russ.)
16. Zhivolupova N. V. Dostoyevsky i Chekhov: aspekty arkhitektoniki i poetiki [Dostoyevsky and Chekhov. The Aspects of Architectonics and Poetics]. Nizhny Novgorod, Dyatlovy gory Publ., 2017, 268 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Sinyakova L.N. Teleology of A. P. Chekhov’s Story “My Life” (Theme and Thematical Motifs). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(9):75-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-9-75-84
Views:
274
Email this article 