The Bu Qi Gui Inscription and Genesis of the Qin State
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-10-57-71
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to define the institutional difference between the aristocratic lineage ruling the service fief of the Western Zhou era and the royal dynasty, reigning over the independent state of the Eastern Zhou era. Different approaches to the genesis of the Qin State are discussed in this paper: the archaeological approach and the “Zhou fiefdom” approach. The first one lacks data directly describing the political process. The problem of the second one is its being based practically on one written source that postdates the events described by 500 years. Therefore, to escape the failures of these methods, the author developed a specific approach that would both deal with political and institutional data on the one side while using data from different sources contemporary to the events in question. Data explicated from Bu Qi gui, Qin gong zhong and Guo ji zi Bai pan – three inscriptions on the bronze vessels dating between IX and VII centuries BC was scrutinized and compared. Two of them were cast by Qin rulers and the third describes the events leading to the creation of the Qin domain. Comparing information of these sources with the data from Sima Qian’s Shi ji allows to determine the precise moment of the Qin domain being transformed into the Qin State and show the institutional innovations that went along with this process. The interior political change of this time is described (i.e. the political crisis of royal inheritance) as well as the exterior change in Qin’s place inside the hierarchy of Zhou domains, particularly the changing relations between the Qin State and the domain of Xiao Guo. This clarified the place that the process of territorial expansion had in this transformation. As a hypothesis, the author built a model presenting the properties distinguishing a service fief and an independent state.
About the Author
M. S. Tseluyko
Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim S. Tseluyko, Chief Analyst, Teacher
Moscow
References
1. Bamboo Annals: drevniy tekst (Gu ben zhu shu ji nian) / per. s kit. M. Yu. Ulyanova pri uchastii D.V. Deopika i A.I. Tarkinoy. [Bamboo Annals: the ancient text (Gu ben zhu shu ji nian) / transl. from Chinese by M. Yu. Ulyanov, participating: D. V. Deopick and A.I. Tarkina]. Moscow, Oriental lit., 2005, 311 p. (in Russ.)
2. Chunqiu Zuozhuan. Kommentariy Zuo k Chunqiu / gl 1–5, komm. i ukazateli M. Yu. Ulyanova [Chunqiu Zuozhuan. Zuo’s commentary to Chunqiu / Ch. 1–5, translation and comments by M. Yu. Ulyanov] Moscow, Oriental lit., 2011, 335 p. (in Russ)
3. History of China. Istoriya Kitaya s drevnejshih vremen do nachala XXI veka. Tom I. Drevnejshaya i drevnyaya istoriya (po arheologicheskim dannym). Ot paleolita do V v. do n. e. [History of China from ancient times to the beginning of the XXI century. Vol. I. The Prehistoric and Ancient History of China (based on archaeological data). From Paleolithic Age to V BC]. Moscow, Nauka – Oriental lit., 2016, 1012 p. (in Russ.)
4. Kriukov M. V., Huang Shuying. Drevnekitayskiy yazyk. [The Ancient Chinese language]. Moscow, Oriental lit., 1978, 512 p. (in Russ.)
5. Kriukov V. M. Tekst i ritual: Opyt interpretacii drevnekitajskoj epigrafiki epohi In'–Zhou [Text and Ritual: Attempt at an Interpretation of Archaic Chinese Epigraphy of the Shang–Zhou Period]. Moscow, Monuments of Historical Thought, 2000, 464 p. (in Russ.)
6. Kriukov V. M. Neumolimyi cherv’ poznaniya. [The unrelenting worm of knowledge]. Moscow, Monuments of Historical Thought, 2009, 680 p. (in Russ.)
7. Kuchera S. R. Povozka (車) v zhizni drevnih kitayzev // Sinologi mira k yubileyu Stanislava Kuchery. Pod redakziei Kobzeva. Kollektiv avtorov. [Cart 車 in the life of the Ancient Chinese. Sinologists of the world to the anniversary of Stanislav Kucera, ed. Kobzev A. I.]. Moscow, Institut Vostokovedenia RAN, 2013, iss. 11, pp. 495–562. (in Russ.)
8. Sima Qian. Istoricheskie zapiski (Shi Ji) [Records of the Grand Historian (Shi Ji)]. Transl. from Chinese by R. V. Vyatkin and V. S. Taskin. Moscow, Oriental lit., 2001. Vol. I. 415 p. (in Russ.)
9. Sima Qian. Istoricheskie zapiski (Shi Ji) [Records of the Grand Historian (Shi Ji)]. Transl. from Chinese by R. V. Vyatkin and V. S. Taskin. Moscow, Oriental lit., 2003. Vol. II. 567 p. (in Russ.)
10. Tseluyko M. S. K probleme periodizacii istorii carstva Qin v 384–211 do n. e. [On the Problem of Periodization of Qin State History in 384–211 BC]. V Puti za Kitayskuyu Stenu. K 60-letiyu A. I. Kobzeva. Iss.12. Moscow, 2014, pp. 455–466. (in Russ.)
11. Tseluyko M. S. Politicheskie instituty drevnej Vostochnoj Azii epohi Chunqiu (VII–V veka do n. e.): mezhdu vnutrennej i vneshnej politikoj [Political Institutions of the Ancient East Asia in the Chunqiu Period (VII–V BC) between the Internal and External Politics]. Journal of Dmitry Pozharsky University, 2019, pp. 205–223. (in Russ.)
12. Tseluyko M. S. Formirovanie territorii metropolii carstva Qin s VII po IV v. do. n. e. [Formation of the Qin State Territory in VIII – IV cc. BC]. Society and State in China. Moscow, Oriental lit., 2019, vol. 49, part 1, pp. 124–176. (in Russ.)
13. Falkenhausen L., Pines Y., Shelach G., Yates R. D. S. General Introduction: Qin History Revisited. Birth of an Empire (New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society). Berkeley, University of California Press, 2013, pp. 1–34.
14. Kern, Martin. Bronze Inscriptions, The Shijing And The Shangshu: The Evolution Of The Ancestral Sacrifice During The Western Zhou. Early Chinese Religion, ed. by Lagerwey and Kalinowski. Volume 1. Leyden, Boston, 2009, pp. 143–200.
15. Pines Yuri. The Question of Interpretation: Qin History in Light of New Epigraphic. Early China, 2004, vol. 29, pp. 1–44.
16. Bi Shuchun. Guo ji zi Bai pan mingwen ji sifu zhi ming kaolun [毕庶春。虢季子白盘铭文及似赋 之铭考论。 辽东学院学报(社会科学版)]. Inscription on Ji Zi Bai Plate of the Guo State and Investigation of Fu–style Inscription. Journal of Eastern Liaoning University (Social Sciences), 2008, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 100–103. (in Chin.)
17. Cai Zhemao. Guo ji zi Bai pan yu Liu Mingchuan [蔡哲茂。 虢季子白盤與劉銘傳。 古今論衡]. Guo Ji Zi Bai Pan and Liu Mingchuan. Gujin lunheng, 2006, no. 15, pp. 17–30. (in Chin.)
18. Gao Shirong. Cong qin gong qi kan qinren zaoqide lishi wenhua [高士荣。从秦公器看秦人早期 的历史文化。 西安财经学院学报]. A View of the Early Historical Culture of People in Qin Dynasty from the Bronze Wares in Early Qin Dynasty. Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, 2015, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 96–100. (in Chin.)
19. Ge Haiyang, Wei Shenyu. Bu Qi gui lue kao [葛海洋、魏慎玉。不其簋略考。 文物鉴定与鉴 赏]. A Brief Study of Bu Qi Gui. Wenwu jianding yu jianshang, 2014, no. 1, pp. 90–93. (in Chin.)
20. Hao Tiechuan. Xi Zhou Zhongyang guanzhide yanbian [郝铁川。 西周中央官制的演变。 河南大 学学报(哲学社会科学版)]. The Evolution of the Western Zhou Central Apparatus. Henan daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban), 1985, no. 4, pp. 49–54. (in Chin.)
21. Li Xueqin. Qin guo wenwude xin renshi [李学勤。秦国文物的新认识 // 文物]. The new data on the Qin state artifacts. Wenwu, 1980, no. 9, pp. 25–31. (in Chin.)
22. Lu Yihan. Qinhua jian “Xinian” yu “Xiguo dongqian” xiangguan wenti kaolun [路懿菡。清华简 《系年》与“西虢东迁”相关问题考论。 文博]. A Discussion of Questions Connected with “Xinian” from the Qinghua Strips. Wenbo, 2019, no. 6, pp. 69–77. (in Chin.)
23. Peng Yushang. Guoguo dongqian kao [彭裕商。虢国东迁考。 历史研究]. An Examination of the Eastward Movement of the State of Guo. Lishi Yanjiu, 2006, no. 5, pp. 12–22. (in Chin.)
24. Teng Mingyu. Qin wenhua: cong fengjianguo dao diguode kaoguxue guancha [滕铭予。 秦文化： 从封建国到帝国的考古学观察]. Qin Culture in Archaeological Perspective: from a Feudal State to Great Empire. Beijing: Xueyuan chubanshe, 2003, 216 p. (in Chin.)
25. Wu Shiqian. Qin gong zhong kaoshi [伍仕谦。秦公钟考释。 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)]. Commented Study on the Qin Gong Zhong. Sichuan daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban), 1980, no. 2, pp. 103–108. (in Chin.)
26. Yong Jichun. Zhou Xiaocong. Lun qinren zaoqi qingtongqi yu qinxi wenzide xingcheng [雍际 春、周晓聪。论秦人早期青铜器与秦系文字的形成。 西安财经学院学报]. On the Evolution of Bronze Wares and Writing System in Early Qin Dynasty. Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, 2015, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 92–95. (in Chin.)
27. Yuan Jinping. Meng Zhen. Xin chu Bo Shofu ding ming kaoyi. [袁金平、孟臻。 《新出伯碩父鼎 銘考釋》 // 《出土文獻》 (中西書局)]. Research and Commentary on the inscription on the recently found Bo Shofu ding. Chutu wenxian (Zhongxi shuju), 2017, no. 10, pp. 47–53. (in Chin.)
28. Zhang Tianen. Dui “Qin gong zhong kaoshi” zhong youguan wentide yi xie kanfa [张天恩。对 “秦公钟考释"中有关问题的一些看法。 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)]. Several Notes on the Questions Connected with the “Qin Gong Zhong Kaoshi”. Sichuan daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban), 1980, no. 4, pp. 93–100. (in Chin.)
Review
For citations:
Tseluyko M.S. The Bu Qi Gui Inscription and Genesis of the Qin State. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(10):57-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-10-57-71
Views:
242
Email this article 