Use-Wear Analysis of the Stone and Bone Industry of Kostenki-9 Site (Based on Material of 2006–2007 Field Research)
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-3-21-31
Abstract
Purpose. The article discusses the results of a use-wear analysis of artifacts from the Kostenki 9 site (Biriutchii log). The site is located in the Middle Don River valley on the southwest of the Russian Plain. Kostenki 9 is related to the group of Paleolithic sites in the Kostenki-Borshchevo locality. Our investigation indicates that paleoeconomy of the local inhabitants was based on the strategies of high specialization.
Results. The authors highlight the main types of stone implements and the main technological methods of production. The inhabitants of the site mainly used chalk flint. Knapping technique is prismatic, the main type of workpiece is a blade. For the secondary processing of blanks, site's inhabitants most often used steep and semi-steep dull retouching. Less commonly, flat unilateral or bilateral, marginal, deeply protruding onto the blade’s dorsal surface. On the basis of use-wear analysis, as well as some experiments, the authors came to the following conclusion: the stone industry of the site has Gravettian features. However, it does not have pronounced diagnostic forms.
Conclusion. The primary type of activity revealed at the Kostenki 9 site is butchering of animal carcasses. Studied use-wear traces on the stone inventory support this conclusion. The second activity represents wood processing. The ancient inhabitants of the Kostenki 9 made the wooden shafts for the darts and spears. Analysis of bone implements revealed several exciting traits. Inhabitants possessed all the basic techniques of bone processing: making grooves and cutting along the circumference. The collection does not include any tools that can be interpreted as hunting bone weapons. This thesis confirms the assumption that the inhabitants of the Kostenki 9 site used wood for tool-making, while the bones and ivory were kept for production of non-utilitarian objects. The cultural identity of the assemblage raises questions. The closest are lithic collections from the Gravettian sites Borshchevo 5 and Kostenki 8.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The authors are grateful to A. E. Dudin – curator of the Kostenki State Archaeological Museum-Reserve – for the opportunity to work with materials
About the Authors
A. M. Rodionov
Natural, Architectural and Archaeological Museum-Reserve “Divnogorye”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anton M. Rodionov, Candidate of Sciences (History)
Voronezh
D. S. Tolstykh
State Archaeological Museum-Reserve “Kostenki”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daria S. Tolstykh, Postgraduate Student of Institute of Archaeology RAS
Voronezh
References
1. Anikovich M. V., Popov V. V., Platonova N. I. Paleolit Kostenkovsko-Borshchevskogo raiona v kontekste verkhnego paleolita Evropy [The Palaeolithic of Kostenki-Borshchevo Area in the Context of the Upper Palaeolithic of Europe]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia, 2008, 304 p. (in Russ.)
2. Dudin A. E. (comp.), Kotlyarova I. V. (ed.). Katalog kollektsii arkheologicheskoi kosti so stoyanok Kostenki 8 i Kostenki 9 [Catalog of the archaeological bone collection from the sites of Kostenki 8 and Kostenki 9]. Voronezh, MegaPrint, 2016, 15 p. (in Russ.)
3. Dudin A. E., Pustovalov A. Yu., Rodionov A. M., Platonova N. I. Novie dannie o kostyanoi industrii vtorogo kulturnogo sloya Telmanskoi stoyanki [New data on the bone industry of the second cultural layer of the Telmanskya site]. In: Verkhnedonskoi arkheologicheskii sbornik. Lipetsk, LSPU Pres, 2019, vol. 11, pp. 141–154. (in Russ.)
4. Girya E. Yu. Tekhnologicheskii analiz kamennykh industrii (metodika mikro-makroanaliza drevnikh orudii truda) [Technological analysis of stone industries (Methods of micro-macroanalysis of ancient tools)]. St. Petersburg, IHMK RAS, 1997, pt. 2, 198 p. (in Russ.)
5. Khlopachev G. A. Bivnevye industrii verkhnego paleolita Vostochnoy Evropy [Tusk industry of the Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2006, 261 p. (in Russ.)
6. Khlopachev G. A., Girya E. Yu. Sekrety drevnikh kostorezov Vostochnoi Evropy i Sibiri: priemy obrabotki bivnya mamonta i roga severnogo olenya v kamennom veke (po arkheologicheskim i eksperimental'nym dannym) [Secrets of ancient carvers of Eastern Europe and Siberia: treatment techniques of ivory and reindeer antler in the stone age]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2010, 144 p. (in Russ.)
7. Lisitsyn S. N. Gravettiiskii kompleks stoianki Borshchevo 5 v Kostenkovsko-Borshchevskom raione na Donu [The Gravettian Complex of the Site Borshchevo 5 in the Kostenki-Borshchevo Region on the Don]. In: Paleolit i Mezolit Vostochnoi Evropy [Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eastern Europe]. Collection of Art. in honor of the 60th anniversary of Kh. A. Amirkhanov. Moscow, IA RAS, 2011, pp. 204–225. (in Russ.)
8. Lisitsyn S. N., Dudin A. E. Gravett / epigravett v Kostenkovsko-Borshchevskom raione na Donu: kriterii razdeleniya, kul'turnaya interpretatsiya i periodizatsiya [The Gravettian / Epigravettian in the Kostenki-Borshevo locality on the Don – the division criteria, cultural interpretation and periodization]. Camera praehistorica, 2019, vol. 1 (2), pp. 70–107. (in Russ.)
9. Popov V. V. Otchet o rabote arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii gosudarstvennogo arkheologicheskogo muzeya-zapovednika “Kostenki” v 2006 g. [Report on the work of the archaeological expedition of the State archaeological museum-reserve “Kostenki” in 2006]. In: Arkhiv GAMZ “Kostenki”. Voronezh, 2006, 23 p. (in Russ.)
10. Popov V. V. Otchet o rabote arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii gosudarstvennogo arkheologicheskogo muzeya-zapovednika “Kostenki” v 2007 g. [Report on the work of the archaeological expedition of the State archaeological museum-reserve “Kostenki” in 2007]. In: Arkhiv GAMZ “Kostenki”. Voronezh, 2007, 39 p. (in Russ.)
11. Praslov N. D., Rogachev A. N. (eds.). Paleolit Kostenkovsko-Borshchevskogo raiona na Donu. 1879–1979. Nekotorye itogi polevykh issledovanii [The Palaeolithic of Kostenki-Borshchevo Area on the River Don. 1879–1979. Some Results of Field Investigations]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1982, 285 p. (in Russ.)
12. Reynolds N., Lisitsyn S. N., Sablin M. V., Barton N., Higham T. F. G. Chronology of the European Russian Gravettian: new radiocarbon dating results and interpretation. Quartär, 2015, vol. 62, pp. 121–132.
13. Rogachev A. N. Mnogosloinye stoianki Kostenkovsko-Borshevskogo raiona na Donu i problema razvitiia kul’tury v epokhu verkhnego paleolita na Russkoi ravnine [Multilayered sites of Kostenki-Borshchevo Area on the Don and the Problem of Cultural Development in the Upper Palaeolithic on the Russian Plain]. In: MIA. Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka, 1957, vol. 59. pp. 9– 134. (in Russ.)
14. Rogachev A. N., Anikovich M. V. Pozdnii paleolit Russkoi ravniny i Kryma [The Upper Palaeolithic of the Russian Plain and Crimea]. In: Boriskovsky P. I. (ed.). Paleolit SSSR [Paleolithic of the USSR]. Moscow, Nauka, 1984, pp. 162–271. (in Russ.)
15. Semenov S. A. Pervobytnaya tekhnika: opyt izucheniya drevneishikh orudii i izdelii po sledam raboty [Prehistoric technology: an experimental study of the oldest tools and artefacts from traces of manufacture and wear]. In: MIA. Moscow; Leningrad, 1957, vol. 54, pp. 240. (in Russ.)
16. Sinitsyn A. A. Gravett Kostenok v kontekste gravetta Vostochnoi Evropy [The Gravettian of Kostenki in the Context of the Gravettian of Eastern Europe]. In: Problemy zaseleniia severozapada Vostochnoi Evropy v verkhnem i final’nom paleolite (kul’turno-istoricheskie protsessy). St. Petersburg, ElekSis, 2013, pp. 4–32. (in Russ)
17. Sinitsyn A. A. Variabilité du Gravettien de Kostenki (Bassin moyen du Don) et des territories associés. Paleo, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 181–202.
18. Tolstykh D. S. Gravirovka po bivnyu mamonta po materialam stoyanki Kostenki 11: trasologiya i eksperimental'nye dannye [Engraving on a mammoth tusk based on materials from Kostenki 11 site: trasology and experimental data]. In: Novye materialy i metody arkheologicheskogo issledovaniya: ot kritiki istochnika k obobshcheniyu i interpretatsii dannykh [New materials and methods of archaeological research: from criticism of the source to generalization and interpretation of data]. Moscow, IA RAS, 2019, pp. 48–51. (in Russ.)
19. Yankovskaya E. P., Gordyshina V. I. Opyt konservatsii predmetov iz kosti akrilat-kremniiorganicheskimi soedineniyami [The experience of preservation of paleontological objects with acrylate-silicon compound]. In: Estestvennonauchnye metody v izuchenii i sokhranenii pamiatnikov Kostenkovsko-Borshchevskogo arkheologicheskogo raiona [Natural science methods in the study and preservation of monuments of the Kostenkovsko-Borshchevsky archaeological district]. Voronezh, VSU Press, 2017, pp. 229–240. (in Russ.)
20. Zheltova M. N. Ostriya aleksandrovskogo tipa: kontekst, morfologiya, funkciya [Point of Alexandrov type: context, morphology, function]. In: Paleolit i Mezolit Vostochnoi Evropy [Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eastern Europe]. Collection of Art. in honor of the 60th anniversary of Kh. A. Amirkhanov. Moscow, IA RAS, 2011, pp. 226–234. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Rodionov A.M., Tolstykh D.S. Use-Wear Analysis of the Stone and Bone Industry of Kostenki-9 Site (Based on Material of 2006–2007 Field Research). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2022;21(3):21-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-3-21-31
Views:
193
Email this article 